Skip to content

· Private foundation

O Perry Earle Jr & Louise Jordan Earle F Foundation C/O O Perry Earle III Truste

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$199k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$290kPhilanthropy$195kHealth$160kEducation$150kFood & Nutrition$125kArts & Culture$100kHousing & Shelter$97kReligion$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$100,000
HELLER HERITAGE ON THE GREEN$50,000
THE CITADEL FOUNDATION$20,000
FAITH MEMORIAL CHAPEL CEDAR MOUNTAIN NC$10,000
UNITED WAY$10,000
STERLING HOPE CENTER$9,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $201k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE HOMELESS PERIOD PROJECT: $10k → 10%Safe Harbor: $93k → 10%MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES: $72k → 10%Miracle Hill Ministries: $19k → 10%SAFE HARBOR: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$834k · 12 repeat orgs$417k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -4% since the first grant, against -31% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
13

Total granted

$834k
$258k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
-31%

Still filing today

75%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $159k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE CITADEL FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +13%
  • MH
    MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2017–2022 · $97k · revenue +49%
  • CC
    CANTERBURY COUNSELING CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $12k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +7%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $45k
  • PH
    PROJECT HOST SLUP KITCHEN
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
2
United Housing Connections

We connect people at-risk for or experiencing homlessness with safe, sustainable, and affordable homes. we work to promote and preserve the dignity and quality of life for all citizens in upstate south carolina.

Community Improvement
3
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
4
Carolina Childrens Home

The mission of Carolina Children's Home is to meet the under-served mental and physical health needs of children, young adults, and their families

Human Services
5
Southern Tier Community Health Center Network Inc

Excellent community health care to all who need services without regard to ability to pay.

Health
6
South Carolina Episcopal Home at Still Hopes

To provide a faith based community where life will be rich and full as god intends it to be, holding to our values, serving one another with dedication and promoting health and wellness for all.

Health
7
Hope House of South Central Wisconsin Inc

The mission of hope house is to prevent abuse and provide support to victims of domestic and sexual violence. our service area includes sauk, columbia, juneau, marquette, and adams counties.

Human Services
8
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
9
Carolina Community Care Inc

The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…

—
10
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
11
Beyond Housing

We strive to serve the community by constructing and rehabilitating homes for affordable homeownership, providing new housing rentals for low to moderate wealth families in south carolina, and providing services that aid in all aspects of…

—
12
Suncoast Community Health Centers Inc

The organization is committed to improving the lives of medically underserved persons by increasing access, reducing disparities, and eliminating barriers to healthcare.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Child's Haven Inc; the most unlike its peers is Caesars Head Heritage Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
6/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $100,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $100,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELS INCIndividual grant recipient: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUnited Way: $80,000 · OtherUnited WayA Child's Haven Inc: $70,000 · OtherA Child's Haven IncFAITH MEMORIAL CHAPEL CEDAR MOUNTAIN NC: $70,000 · OtherFAITH MEMORIAL CHAPEL CEDAR MOUNTAIN NCHELLER HERITAGE ON THE GREEN: $50,000 · OtherHELLER HERITAGE ON THE GREENIndividual grant recipient: $45,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSLATER MARIETTA HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES INC: $30,200 · Other+8 more: $109,700 · Other+8 moreSAFE HARBOR INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesSAFE HARBOR INCMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $97,200 · Human ServicesMIRACLE HILL MINIS…THE HOMELESS PERIOD PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE CITADEL FOUNDATION: $150,000 · EducationTHE CITADEL F…GATEWAY HOUSE INC: $50,000 · HealthCANTERBURY COUNSELING CENTER: $11,800 · HealthSERVANTS FOR SIGHT: $3,000 · HealthSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $50,000 · Arts & CultureCAESARS HEAD HERITAGE FUND: $10,000 · Community ImprovementSTERLING HOPE CENTER CORPORATION: $9,300 · PhilanthropyYOUTHBASE INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$754,900Human Services$207,200Education$150,000Health$64,800Arts & Culture$50,000Community Improvement$10,000Philanthropy$9,300Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CITADEL FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC: $100,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC: $97,200 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetA Child's Haven Inc: $70,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE: $50,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGATEWAY HOUSE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSLATER MARIETTA HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES INC: $30,200 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetGREENVILLE FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $24,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCANTERBURY COUNSELING CENTER: $11,800 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetCAESARS HEAD HERITAGE FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HOMELESS PERIOD PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetYOUTHBASE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSERVANTS FOR SIGHT: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CITADEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE HARBOR INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds A Child's Haven Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SLATER MARIETTA HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENVILLE FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds CANTERBURY COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CAESARS HEAD HERITAGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOMELESS PERIOD PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds STERLING HOPE CENTER CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds YOUTHBASE INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVANTS FOR SIGHT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jolley FoundationNV22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jolley Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Charity Ball Board of Greenville · John I Smith Charities Inc · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · W W Burgiss Charities Inc · Yeargin Foundation · Don Waggoner & Zelma Waggoner Foundation · Sisk Foundation Buncombe St Methodist Church

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization O Perry Earle Jr & Louise Jordan Earle F Foundation C/O O Perry Earle III Truste funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from O Perry Earle Jr & Louise Jordan Earle F Foundation C/O O Perry Earle III Truste. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to O Perry Earle Jr & Louise Jordan Earle F Foundation C/O O Perry Earle III Truste?

    Find your warmest path to O Perry Earle Jr & Louise Jordan Earle F Foundation C/O O Perry Earle III Truste through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on O Perry Earle Jr & Louise Jordan Earle F Foundation C/O O Perry Earle III Truste’s filings →

    More from the funding graph