· Private foundation
O Perry Earle Jr & Louise Jordan Earle F Foundation C/O O Perry Earle III Truste
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 60% of O PERRY EARLE JR & LOUISE JORDAN EARLE F FOUNDATION C/O O PERRY EARLE III TRUSTE’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $150k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SALVATION ARMY | $100,000 |
| HELLER HERITAGE ON THE GREEN | $50,000 |
| THE CITADEL FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| UNITED WAY | $10,000 |
| FAITH MEMORIAL CHAPEL CEDAR MOUNTAIN NC | $10,000 |
| STERLING HOPE CENTER | $9,300 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $201k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against -31% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $159k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
THE CITADEL FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $150k · revenue +13%- SHSAFE HARBOR INC2× · 2020–2021 · $100k · revenue +182%
- MHMIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC3× · 2017–2022 · $97k · revenue +49%
Funded once
- MOMEALS ON WHEELS INCone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +7%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $45k
- PHPROJECT HOST SLUP KITCHENone grant, 2021 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse
We connect people at-risk for or experiencing homlessness with safe, sustainable, and affordable homes. we work to promote and preserve the dignity and quality of life for all citizens in upstate south carolina.
To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…
The mission of Carolina Children's Home is to meet the under-served mental and physical health needs of children, young adults, and their families
Excellent community health care to all who need services without regard to ability to pay.
To provide a faith based community where life will be rich and full as god intends it to be, holding to our values, serving one another with dedication and promoting health and wellness for all.
The mission of hope house is to prevent abuse and provide support to victims of domestic and sexual violence. our service area includes sauk, columbia, juneau, marquette, and adams counties.
Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.
The mission of hospice & community care is to give hope, comfort, and compassion to those that need it most. hospice & community care is a nonprofit healthcare organization providing hospice and palliative care to residents of york,…
Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST
We strive to serve the community by constructing and rehabilitating homes for affordable homeownership, providing new housing rentals for low to moderate wealth families in south carolina, and providing services that aid in all aspects of…
The organization is committed to improving the lives of medically underserved persons by increasing access, reducing disparities, and eliminating barriers to healthcare.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Child's Haven Inc and the most unlike its peers is Caesars Head Heritage Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CITADEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HARBOR INC ↗
- Who funds MIRACLE HILL MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds A Child's Haven Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA CHILDREN'S THEATRE ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SLATER MARIETTA HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GREENVILLE FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds CANTERBURY COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds CAESARS HEAD HERITAGE FUND ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREENVILLE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOMELESS PERIOD PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds STERLING HOPE CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTHBASE INC ↗
- Who funds SERVANTS FOR SIGHT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Jolley Foundation · Scsymmes Foundation · Daniel-Mickel Foundation · United Way of Greenville County Inc · Scansource Charitable Foundation · Charity Ball Board of Greenville · John I Smith Charities Inc · Dabo's All in Team Foundation · W W Burgiss Charities Inc · Yeargin Foundation · Don Waggoner & Zelma Waggoner Foundation · Sisk Foundation Buncombe St Methodist Church
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization O Perry Earle Jr & Louise Jordan Earle F Foundation C/O O Perry Earle III Truste funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to O Perry Earle Jr & Louise Jordan Earle F Foundation C/O O Perry Earle III Truste?
Find your warmest path to O Perry Earle Jr & Louise Jordan Earle F Foundation C/O O Perry Earle III Truste through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.