· Private foundation
O'Neill Family Charitable Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k100 grants · $1.6M
- $50k–250k30 grants · $3.3M
- $250k+11 grants · $3.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK | $500,000 |
| WINROCK INTERNATIONAL | $400,000 |
| COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG INCOME TRANSFER ACCOUNT | $350,000 |
| HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES | $350,000 |
| ASIAN CULTURAL COUNCIL | $300,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL HOUSE | $300,000 |
| COLONIAL WILLIAMSBURG INCOME TRANSFER ACCOUNT | $275,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $265,000 |
| MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER | $260,000 |
| ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF | $255,000 |
| NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC | $250,000 |
| ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY | $230,000 |
| ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND | $219,000 |
| ST DOMINIC'S CHURCH ENDOWMENT | $215,000 |
| METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART | $210,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $630k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 13% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
65 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 53 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACASIAN CULTURAL COUNCIL INC2× · 2023–2024 · $820k · revenue +23%
- WIWINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT2× · 2023–2024 · $700k · revenue +1%
- IHINTERNATIONAL HOUSE2× · 2023–2024 · $665k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- CWColonial Williamsburg Income Transfer Account (COLONWIT)one grant, 2022 · $490k
- ACAsian Cultural Council (739) Asian Cultural Council, Incone grant, 2022 · $355k
- IHInternational House (4996)one grant, 2022 · $266k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…
The mission of rhode island school of design, through its college and museum,is to educate its students and the public in the creation and (see schedule o)appreciation of works of art and design, to discover and transmit knowledge and to…
The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International House and the most unlike its peers is Somes-Meynell Wildlife Sanctuary. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
101 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 101 of the 230 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASIAN CULTURAL COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds WINROCK INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL HOUSE ↗
- Who funds HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ROCKEFELLER BROTHERS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
- Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF OYSTER BAY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Greenacre Foundation ↗
- Who funds Math Corps ↗
- Who funds Youth & Family Counseling Agency of Oyster Bay - East Norwich Inc ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds EAST WOODS SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF SOUTHBOROUGH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Gerrish H Milliken Foundation 009209-009 · Colket Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · The Edward Marthann Samek Foundation · The Eacho Family Foundation · Bernard F & Alva B Gimbel Foundation Inc · Janet Stone Jones Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization O'Neill Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Somerville Homeless Coalition Inc — 31% of income from government
- Safe Place and Rape Crisis Center Inc — 23% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- Bok Tower Gardens Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Rectory School Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Palm Beach Day Academy Inc — 0% of income from government
- Florida Studio Theatre Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to O'Neill Family Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to O'Neill Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.