· Public charity
Ntra Charities Inc
To promote, build awareness for, and support charities in or related to the thoroughbred industry.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
How this is measured
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ED BROWN SOCIETY | $50,000 |
| NATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INC | $10,000 |
| UNIVIERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
3 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- AHAmerican Horse Council Foundation Inc2× · 2018–2023 · $50k · revenue -56%
- TATHOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE FOUNDATI DBA THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE2× · 2023–2024 · $23k · revenue +16%
- NMNATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INC2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of Kentucky Gluck Equineone grant, 2020 · $78k
- PDPERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INCone grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue 0%
- PEPENN ENTERTAINMENT FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue ×17,828
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support and fund equine research
Engage,educate, and excite everyone about the extraordinary kentucky derby experience!
The federation provides leadership for equestrian sport in the united states by promoting the pursuit of excellence based on a foundation of fair, safe competition and the welfare of its human and equine athletes.
To benefit, aid, relief, and assist racing personnel employed in horse racing.
Coordinate and protect the interests of the equine industry in the United States.
The consortium funds research, develops and promotes policy recommendations, and educates stakeholders in support of horse racing safety and integrity.
The organization is devoted to the rescue, rehabilitation, retraining and adoption of abused, slaughter-bound, abandoned and neglected horses.
The harness racing museum & hall of fame is dedicated to comprehensive, active and authoritative support and promotion of the standardbred racing through documentation and preservation of the history and traditions of this american-born…
Access to and conservation of land for equine use
To further the equestrian sport of 3 day eventing.
Animal and consumer protection
How this is measured
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 8 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds American Horse Council Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ED BROWN SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE FOUNDATI DBA THOROUGHBRED AFTERCARE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INC ↗
- Who funds PERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
- Who funds PENN ENTERTAINMENT FOUNDATION ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Keeneland Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Ntra Charities Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ntra Charities Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
How this is measured
Play a game based on Ntra Charities’ filings →