· Public charity
Npt Charitable Asset Trust
The mission of the NPT CHARITABLE ASSET TRUST is to provide support for health, human services, public societal benefit, culture & arts, and educational purposes in furtherance of the mission of national philanthropic trust (npt).
Read this first · the figures below need context
97% of Npt Charitable Asset Trust’s FY2025 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 3 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k3 grants · $85k
- $250k+1 grant · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST | $2,356,765 |
| OLE HEALTH FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| NAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION | $25,000 |
| NIMBUS ARTS | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NVNAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION9× · 2017–2025 · $601k · revenue +96%
- NANIMBUS ARTS9× · 2017–2025 · $367k · revenue +27%
- OHOLE HEALTH FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $175k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- TVTHE VECNA CARES CHARITABLE TRUSTone grant, 2022 · $1.2M · revenue -42%
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA INCone grant, 2019 · $60k · revenue +22%
- BOBRING ON THE MUSIC INCone grant, 2024 · $30k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…
The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.
The napa valley museum is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization dedicated to enriching the cultural fabric of our community through exhibitions, collections, educational programs and creative activities that promote knowledge and…
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
To serve the public by producing world-class opera that preserves, promotes and advances the art form while embodying the diversity, spirit and artistic sensibility unique to los angeles. we envision an engaged and enlightened community in…
The reno philharmonic association's (rpa) mission is to produce inspirational orchestral performances of the highest quality for diverse audiences and support exceptional educational, outreach and engagement programs.
To invest in america's finest artists and illuminate the value of artists to society.
To present a world class chamber music festival in the Napa Valley.
To enlighten, engage, educate, and enrich the community and to build on naples art's history and position of leadership as a hub of visual arts in southwest florida. we believe art can change lives and improve entire communities. continued…
We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.
To create intimate, inspirational musical experiences by engaging the community through vibrant music making by the chamber orchestra and chamber ensembles.
Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Napa Valley Festival Association and the most unlike its peers is St Helena Hospital Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST ↗
- Who funds THE VECNA CARES CHARITABLE TRUST ↗
- Who funds NAPA VALLEY FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Auction Napa Valley Collective Napa Valley ↗
- Who funds NIMBUS ARTS ↗
- Who funds OLE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds St Helena Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA AND CALISTOGA INC ↗
- Who funds CLASSICAL TAHOE ↗
- Who funds BRING ON THE MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ABILITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF CREATIVE ARTS ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Foundation for Global Arts ↗
- Who funds Notes for Education Inc ↗
- Who funds BOYS CLUB OF NAPA INC BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NAPA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds JOIN HANDS ESL ↗
- Who funds di Rosa Preserve ↗
- Who funds COLLABRIA CARE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Craig and Kathryn Hall Foundation · E Richard Jones Family Foundation Mr E Richard Jones · Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · Richard Frank Foundation · McMinn Foundation · The David Butler Family Foundation · Robert Lee Hudson Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Phelps Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Npt Charitable Asset Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.