Skip to content

· Private foundation

Noxsel Waddell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$226kEducation$42kHealth$35kHousing & Shelter$28kReligion$20kScience & Tech$13kPhilanthropy$5kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA$20,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$5,500
ALSACST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH$5,500
THE INDEPENENCE FUND$5,000
SAMARITANS PURSE US DISATER FUND$5,000
INTERFAITH COMM SERVICES$5,000
MAKE-A-WISH AMERICA$5,000
WOUNDED WARRIOIR PROJECT$5,000
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$5,000
RAMBOTICS BOOSTERS$4,000
LAKOTA ROBOTICS$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OH
CA
VA
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$408k · 17 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +74% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
15

Total granted

$408k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+74%
+28%

Still filing today

53%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthEducationPublic BenefitCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GARY SINISE FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $37k · revenue +99%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $28k · revenue +112%
  • LR
    Lakota Robotics LLC
    3× · 2019–2025 · $17k · revenue ×42

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • LR
    LAKOTA ROBOTICS FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
2
Homes for Veterans a Nj Non Profit Corporation

Our mission is to provide a holistic approach to support veterans with disabilities by removing barriers in every aspect of their lives. this includes funding customized, barrier-free home modificationssuch as wheelchair-accessible…

Housing & Shelter
3
Special Ops Survivors

Special ops survivors advances the mission "to embrace and empower surviving spouses of fallen special operations heroes to build healthy post-loss futures as they transition and rebuild their new lives." the foundation provides programs…

Human Services
4
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
5
David Lynch Foundation for Consciousness -Based Education and World Peace

The david lynch foundation for consciousness-based education and world peace (the "foundation or "dlf") is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization founded in 2005. the foundation helps to prevent and eradicate the epidemic of trauma and toxic…

Philanthropy
6
The Veterans and First Responders
Human Services
7
Veterans Inc

Veterans inc.'s mission is to end homelessness among veterans by helping veterans regain control of their lives. we believe that all veterans have earned respect and gratitude from our nation. this belief is translated into the philosophy…

Community Improvement
8
Swords to Plowshares Veterans Rights Organization

Swords to plowshares' mission is to heal the wounds of war, to restore dignity, hope and self-sufficiency to all veterans in need, and to significantly reduce homelessness and poverty among veterans.

Public Benefit
9
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
10
Head Strong Project Inc

The head strong project (headstrong) is a non-profit organization founded in 2012 that provides barrier-free, stigma-free ptsd treatment to veterans, transitioning service members, and family members connected to their care.

Health
11
Robert Irvine Foundation Inc

The robert irvine foundation is a not-for-profit entity and is tax exempt under 501(c) (3) of the internal revenue code (irc). the organization supports and strengthens the physical and mental well-being of our service members, veterans,…

Human Services
12
CJ3 Foundation

Cj3 foundation provides services, support, and advocacy to united states military service members, veterans/disabled veterans, law enforcement, and emergency responders who need/require assistance, and then connecting them with resources…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stephen Siller Tunnel to Towers Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Sciotoville Community School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $27,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYINTERFAITH COMM SERVICES: $25,000 · OtherINTERFAITH COMM SERVICESLakota Robotics LLC: $17,000 · OtherLakota Robotics LLCMAKE-A-WISH AMERICA: $15,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH AMERICAIndividual grant recipient: $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWOUNDED WARRIOIR PROJECT: $10,000 · OtherWOUNDED WARRIOIR PROJECTInterfaith Community Services Inc: $10,000 · OtherInterfaith Community Services IncIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAKOTA ROBOTICS FUND: $9,000 · OtherRAMBOTICS BOOSTERS: $8,000 · Other+12 more: $42,500 · Other+12 moreAGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $130,000 · Human ServicesAGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INCWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $17,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INCGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $37,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINIS…VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyVOLUNTEER …The Independence Fund Inc: $39,000 · Public BenefitThe Indep…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $27,500 · EducationSCIOTOVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $1,000 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $17,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 · ReligionSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$186,000Human Services$147,000Philanthropy$42,000Public Benefit$39,000Education$28,500Health$19,500Religion$10,000Crime & Legal$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $130,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetThe Independence Fund Inc: $39,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $37,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $27,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLakota Robotics LLC: $17,000 over 3y, 21% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $17,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInterfaith Community Services Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AGAPE OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds The Independence Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Lakota Robotics LLC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Interfaith Community Services Inc ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SCIOTOVILLE COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Noxsel Waddell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Noxsel Waddell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Noxsel Waddell’s filings →

More from the funding graph