Skip to content

· Public charity

Norwalk Area United Fund

To improve the quality of life in the community by being involved with local agencies and organizations so as to assess area issues, concerns and needs, raising money to fund essential local programs, ensuring our donors gifts are well spent and kept local.

$309k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Human Services$630kHealth$143kYouth Development$81kReligion$77kEducation$56kPublic Safety & Disaster$38kHousing & Shelter$28kRecreation & Sports$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $293,666, the rows itemized in this filing. The $309,166 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $204k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$16,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$75,378
SERVICES FOR AGING$28,000
CANCER SERVICES$25,000
SIMON ACTS$24,130
SALVATION ARMY$20,000
LIFEWISE ACADEMY$17,500
Individual grant recipient$16,500
CLOTHING BANK$16,000
KINDERCASA$12,500
KIDNEY FOUNDATION$12,329
REACH OUR YOUTH$11,413
AMERICAN RED CROSS OF NORTH CENTRAL$10,151
RAILS TO TRAILS$10,000
ARTISTS' OPEN STUDIO$9,140
CAC HOMELESS SHELTER$5,625
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $211k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF NORTH CENTRAL: $11k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF NORTH CENTRAL: $10k → 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS OF NORTH CENTRAL: $10k → 9%SERVICES FOR AGING: $28k → 13%SERVICES FOR AGING: $28k → 13%SERVICES FOR AGING: $28k → 13%SERVICES FOR AGING INC: $26k → 13%CLOTHING BANK: $16k → 13%CLOTHING BANK: $16k → 13%SERVICES FOR AGING: $14k → 13%CLOTHING BANK: $11k → 13%CAC HOMELESS SHELTER: $8k → 13%CLOTHING BANK: $6k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 14 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -4% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
-14%

Still filing today

50%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LI
    LIFEWISE INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +184%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    3× · 2023–2025 · $31k · revenue +22%
  • FR
    FIRELANDS RAILS TO TRAILS INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $28k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • TN
    THE NEW LONDON ALLIANCE CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $14k
  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION OF ERIE HURON & RICHLAND COUNTIES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue -29%
  • AR
    AMERICAN RED CROSS
    one grant, 2021 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cleveland-Rutherford Kidney Association

Service to end stage renal patients

Health
2
Norwalk Congregate Homes for the Elderly Inc

The corporation owns and operates a 49 unit hud subsidized low income elderly housing

Housing & Shelter
3
Portage Library Association

Public library services

Education
4
Council on Aging Wyandot

To provide services under Title II of The Older American Citizens Act of 1965

—
5
Norwalk Community Health Center

To provide quality, innovative care that enriches the lives of our patients.

Health
6
Oneida Healthcare Corporation

The mission of oneida healthcare corporation is to respond to the shortage of decent, safe and sanitary healthcare facilities by planning, constructing, owning, and financing healthcare facilities for the use of oneida health.

Health
7
Area Office On Aging of Northwestern Ohio Inc

The area office on aging of northwestern ohio, inc. promotes the health, well-being and safety of older adults, persons with disabilities and family caregivers to foster independence.

Human Services
8
Fisher-Titus Foundation

To preserve and enhance the health-care services available within our region by raising funds for capital building projects, technology, and to improve and expand health-care facilities to better serve residents.

—
9
Hospice of Northwest Ohio

Hospice of northwest ohio provides specialized medical emotional and spiritual care to people of all ages - and their families - living with any end-stage illness in northwest ohio and southeast michigan

—
10
Northeast Ohio Neighborhood Health Services Inc

Our mission is to enhance the quality of life of northeast ohio residents by providing comprehensive and excellent health care services in a sensitive and caring environment.

—
11
Ohio Hills Health Services

Ohio hills health services is a non-profit health care operation, organized by communities in eastern ohio to promote healthy lifestyles and to provide preventative and comprehensive medical and dental care for area residents. the primary…

—
12
Windom Volunteer Fire Co Inc

Volunteer fire department

Public Safety & Disaster
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Clothing Bank of Norwalk Ohio; the most unlike its peers is Norwalk Childcare Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF TOLEDO INC: $299,750 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF TOLEDO INCTHE SALVATION ARMY: $161,583 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient: $74,536 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSIMON ACTS INC: $62,623 · OtherSIMON ACTS INCNORWALK CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $55,683 · OtherNORWALK CATHOLIC SCHOOLREACH OUR YOUTH CHARITABLE TRUST: $40,877 · OtherREACH OUR YOUTH CHARITABLE TRUST+4 more: $47,537 · Other+4 moreSERVICES FOR AGING INC: $123,000 · Human ServicesSERVICES FOR AGING I…THE CLOTHING BANK OF NORWALK OHIO: $49,000 · Human ServicesTHE CLOTHING BANK OF…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $31,443 · Human ServicesAmerican National Re…COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION OF ERIE HURON & RICHLAND COUNTIES INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesFISHER-TITUS MEDICAL CENTER: $107,348 · HealthFISHER-TITUS …KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF OHIO INC: $35,500 · HealthKIDNEY FOUNDA…LIFEWISE INC: $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIRELANDS RAILS TO TRAILS INC: $27,500 · Recreation & SportsARTISTS OPEN STUDIO INC: $9,140 · Arts & Culture
Other$742,589Human Services$210,943Health$142,848Youth Development$40,000Recreation & Sports$27,500Arts & Culture$9,140

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSERVICES FOR AGING INC: $123,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetFISHER-TITUS MEDICAL CENTER: $107,348 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLOTHING BANK OF NORWALK OHIO: $49,000 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetLIFEWISE INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIDNEY FOUNDATION OF OHIO INC: $35,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $31,443 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFIRELANDS RAILS TO TRAILS INC: $27,500 over 3y, 19% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION OF ERIE HURON & RICHLAND COUNTIES INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SERVICES FOR AGING INC ↗
  • Who funds FISHER-TITUS MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE CLOTHING BANK OF NORWALK OHIO ↗
  • Who funds LIFEWISE INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds FIRELANDS RAILS TO TRAILS INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS OPEN STUDIO INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION OF ERIE HURON & RICHLAND COUNTIES INC ↗
  • Who funds NORWALK CHILDCARE CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Price-Downey-Buckland FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Price-Downey-Buckland Foundation · The Twenty First Century Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norwalk Area United Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norwalk Area United Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Norwalk Area United’s filings →

    More from the funding graph