Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Northwest Immigrant Rights Project

NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT (nwirp) is a nonprofit organization committed to defending and advancing the rights of immigrants through immigration legal services to persons of low income, and also by providing community education and systemic advocacy.

$1.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$386k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Crime & Legal$4.2MHuman Services$169kHealth$90k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $79k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $89k
  • $250k+3 grants · $993k
$264,909
Median grant
1
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLECTIVA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO$386,082
LEGAL COUNSEL FOR YOUTH & CHILDREN$342,493
MANZANITA HOUSE$264,909
API CHAYA$89,285
GRANT COUNTY DBA NEW HOPE$44,801
CIELO RADLO RANCH PROJECT$34,400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $644k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%CIELO RADLO RANCH PROJECT: $34k → 9%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $104k → 9%SKAGIT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $36k → 11%YWCA OF WALLA WALLA: $22k → 13%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $94k → 9%SKAGIT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $29k → 11%YWCA OF WALLA WALLA: $18k → 13%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $91k → 9%SKAGIT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $27k → 11%YWCA OF WALLA WALLA: $15k → 13%SKAGIT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES: $10k → 11%WASHINGTON IMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY NETWORK (WAISN): $28k → 9%WASHINGTON IMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY NETWORK: $12k → 9%TACOMA COMMUNITY HOUSE: $9k → 9%REFUGEE WOMENS ALLIANCE: $47k → 9%REFUGEE WOMENS ALLIANCE: $45k → 9%REFUGEE WOMENS ALLIANCE: $22k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.4M · 12 repeat orgs$79k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against -26% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$4.4M
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-26%

Still filing today

92%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalCivil RightsHealthArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CL
    COLECTIVA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +134% · 29% of their budget
  • MH
    Manzanita House
    2× · 2023–2024 · $352k · revenue +13%
  • AC
    API CHAYA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $251k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • GC
    GRANT COUNTY
    one grant, 2024 · $45k
  • CP
    CIELO PROJECT AT RADIO RANCH
    one grant, 2024 · $34k · revenue -26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sexual Violence Law Center

Sexual Violence Law Center (SVLC) is a nonprofit law firm that protects the safety, privacy, and civil rights of survivors of sexual and gender-based violence in Washington through holistic and trauma-informed practices rooted in race and…

Human Services
2
Skagit Legal Aid

To provide access to justice for low income and historically marginalized individuals through 1) providing free legal services to those persons who by reason of poverty and unable to effectively access the legal system, 2) promoting, and…

Crime & Legal
3
Casa de Esperanza

Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…

Human Services
4
Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc

To provide transformative legal services that enable diverse communities in East Palo Alto and beyond to achieve a secure and thriving future.

Crime & Legal
5
Pueblo Unido Pdx

Connect immigrants to legal, social, and interpretation services.

Human Services
6
Sage Indigenous Law Center

Sage Indigenous Law Center's mission is to provide culturally grounded civil legal aid that protects the rights of Native American parents, children, and communities, while advancing justice and addressing systemic inequities.

Crime & Legal
7
Central Washington Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

We increase access to economic opportunities for business owners, entrepreneurs, and individuals in Central Washington by connecting and providing them with resources, representation, and opportunities to build community.

Community Improvement
8
Rebuilding Hope Sexual Assault Center

Rebuilding Hope offers support toward healing through advocacy and therapy for those affected by sexual assault abuse and commercial sexual exploitation. Through education and collaboration Rebuilding Hope improves the communitys response…

9
Jewish Coalition for Immigrant Justice Northwest

The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.

Human Services
10
Cowlitz-Wahkiakum County Legal Aid Program Inc

Cowlitz Wahkiakum Legal Aid seeks to assure justice for low income people in the civil courts. We provide access to legal help for people whose livelihood, family and wellness are threatened.

Crime & Legal
11
Washington Court Appointed Special Advoc

CASA's Goal is to provide a carefully researched background of the children who are experiencing abuse and neglect to help the court make a sound decision about the childrens future.

12
Lutheran Community Services Northwest

LCSNW partners with individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope. LCSNW provides a wide variety of social services in Oregon, Washington and Idaho and serves people of all ages, cultures and faiths.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Women's Christian Association of Walla Walla and the most unlike its peers is Manzanita House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COLECTIVA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO — $2,544,584 · Civil RightsCOLECTIVA LEGAL DEL PUEBLOTacoma Community House — $297,805 · Human ServicesTacoma Community…Refugee Womens Alliance — $114,176 · Human ServicesRefugee Womens A…SKAGIT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES — $102,689 · Human ServicesSKAGIT DOMESTIC …YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WALLA WALLA — $55,158 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMEN'S CH…WASHINGTON IMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY NETWORK — $39,866 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON IMMIG…CIELO PROJECT AT RADIO RANCH — $34,400 · Human ServicesCIELO PROJECT AT…LEGAL COUNSEL FOR YOUTH AND CHILDREN — $369,311 · Crime & LegalLEGAL COUNSEL F…API CHAYA — $250,943 · Crime & LegalAPI CHAYAManzanita House — $351,515 · Arts & CultureTacoma-Pierce County Bar Association — $126,816 · OtherGRANT COUNTY — $44,801 · OtherKING COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY & HUMAN SERVICES — $34,151 · OtherConsejo Counseling & Referral Service — $89,719 · Health
Civil Rights$2,544,584Human Services$644,094Crime & Legal$620,254Arts & Culture$351,515Other$205,768Health$89,719

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLECTIVA LEGAL DEL PUEBLO — $2,544,584 over 8y, 29% of budgetLEGAL COUNSEL FOR YOUTH AND CHILDREN — $369,311 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetManzanita House — $351,515 over 2y, 23% of budgetTacoma Community House — $297,805 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetAPI CHAYA — $250,943 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTacoma-Pierce County Bar Association — $126,816 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetRefugee Womens Alliance — $114,176 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSKAGIT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES — $102,689 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetConsejo Counseling & Referral Service — $89,719 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WALLA WALLA — $55,158 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWASHINGTON IMMIGRANT SOLIDARITY NETWORK — $39,866 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCIELO PROJECT AT RADIO RANCH — $34,400 over 1y, 3.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Inatai FoundationWA23.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Inatai Foundation · Seattle Foundation · United Way of King County · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Sheng-Yen Lu Foundation · Medina Foundation · Gates Foundation · Young Womens Christian Association of Seattle-King County-Snohomish County · Legal Foundation of Washington · NW Childrens Foundation · Raikes Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Northwest Immigrant Rights Project funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph