Skip to content
Northeastern Health Systems at a glance

· Public charity

Northeastern Health Systems

To support healthcare in the community.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$289kReligion$35kEducation$30kHuman Services$10k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $60,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $70,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE PEGGIE AND PAUL SHEVLIN FAMILY FOUNDATION$10,000
LISAS ARMY INC$10,000
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC$10,000
THE PINK ELEPHANT MOVEMENT$10,000
SAINT FRANCIS MINISTRIES INC$10,000
SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 89% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%THE PEGGIE AND PAUL SHEVLIN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH: $10k → 15%LISAS ARMY INC: $10k → 22%SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH INC: $10k → 6%SAINT FRANCIS MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 13%THE PEGGIE AND PAUL SHEVLIN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH: $10k → 15%FOUNDATION FOR BREAST & PROSTATE HEALTH: $5k → 22%SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH: $5k → 15%THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $2k → 22%LADIES OF PORT RICHMOND: $5k → 22%LADIES OF PORT RICHMOND: $5k → 22%LADIES OF PORT RICHMOND: $5k → 22%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $15k → 22%TEMPLE HEALTH SYSTEMS: $15k → 22%TEMPLE HEALTH SYSTEMS: $10k → 22%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $10k → 22%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 22%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 22%TEMPLE HEALTH SYSTEMS: $10k → 22%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL(TUH): $10k → 22%TEMPE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 22%TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL(TUH): $6k → 22%TEMPLE HEALTH SYSTEMS: $4k → 22%TEMPLE HEALTH SYSTEMS: $4k → 22%LISA'S ARMY: $10k → 22%LISA'S ARMY: $10k → 22%LISA'S ARMY: $5k → 22%NAZARETH HOSPITAL: $2k → 22%NAZARETH HOSPITAL: $2k → 22%ST FRANCIS INN: $15k → 22%ST FRANCIS INN: $10k → 22%ST FRANCIS INN: $10k → 22%THE PINK ELEPHANT: $10k → 22%THE PINK ELEPHANT MOVEMENT: $10k → 22%ST FRANCIS INN: $10k → 22%ST FRANCIS INN: $10k → 22%THE PINK ELEPHANT: $10k → 22%ST FRANCIS INN: $10k → 22%ST FRANCIS INN: $10k → 22%THE PINK ELEPHANT: $10k → 22%THE PINK ELEPHANT: $5k → 22%THE PINK ELEPHANT: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$302k · 10 repeat orgs$62k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
4

Total granted

$302k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+11%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    The Pink Elephant Movement
    6× · 2018–2025 · $50k · revenue +6%
  • TU
    Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education
    2× · 2022–2023 · $20k · revenue +13%
  • NH
    NAZARETH HOSPITAL
    2× · 2017–2018 · $4k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • TU
    Temple University Health System Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +11%
  • TU
    TEMPE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • BP
    BREAST & PROSTATE HEALTH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
2
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
3
The Nebraska Medical Center

The Nebraska Medical Center (TNMC)'s mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
Baylor Research Institute

To improve the care and well being of our community, nationally and internationally, through innovative clinically relevant research that is consistent with the mission, vision and values of Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).

Health
6
Saint Peter's University Hospital

Keeping faith with the teachings of the roman catholic church and guided by the bishop of metuchen, saint peter's university hospital is committed to humble service to humanity, especially the poor, through competence and good stewardship…

Health
7
Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals Inc

Thomas jefferson university hospitals, inc. ("tjuh") is dedicated to improving the health of the communities we serve. we are committed to: 1) setting the standard for excellence in the delivery of patient care, patient safety and the…

Health
8
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
9
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
10
Saint Peters Healthcare System Inc

Saint peter's healthcare system, inc. is a not for-profit holding company based in new brunswick, new jersey. saint peter's healthcare system, inc. is the sole corporate member of a number of not for-profit entities and the sole…

—
11
Jefferson Health - Northeast

To provide exceptional patient care and customer service to members of the communities served by the hospitals, and to recognize a patient's right to considerate and respectful care, regardless of ability to pay. please refer to schedule o…

Health
12
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Temple University Health System Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lisas Army Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST FRANCIS INN: $75,000 · OtherST FRANCIS INNTEMPLE HEALTH SYSTEMS: $42,000 · OtherTEMPLE HEALTH SYSTEMSSISTERS OF ST JOSEPH: $25,000 · OtherSISTERS OF ST JOSEPHTEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL(TUH): $16,000 · OtherTEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL(TUH)LADIES OF PORT RICHMOND: $15,000 · OtherLADIES OF PORT RICHMONDSaint Francis Ministries Inc: $10,000 · OtherTEMPE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · OtherSisters of St Joseph Inc: $10,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherThe Pink Elephant Movement: $50,000 · HealthThe Pink Elephant MovementLISAS ARMY INC: $35,000 · HealthLISAS ARMY INCTHE PEGGIE AND PAUL SHEVLIN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthTHE PEGGIE AND PAUL SHEVLIN FAMILY FO…Temple University Hospital Inc: $10,000 · HealthTemple University Hospital Inc+2 more: $5,600 · HealthTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $20,000 · EducationTemple Uni…Temple University Health System Inc: $15,000 · EducationTemple Uni…
Other$208,000Health$120,600Education$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Pink Elephant Movement: $50,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetLISAS ARMY INC: $35,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEGGIE AND PAUL SHEVLIN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTemple University Health System Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSaint Francis Ministries Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSisters of St Joseph Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTemple University Hospital Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAZARETH HOSPITAL: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Pink Elephant Movement ↗
  • Who funds LISAS ARMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
  • Who funds THE PEGGIE AND PAUL SHEVLIN FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Temple University Health System Inc ↗
  • Who funds Saint Francis Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sisters of St Joseph Inc ↗
  • Who funds Temple University Hospital Inc ↗
  • Who funds NAZARETH HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Northeastern Health Systems funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Northeastern Health Systems. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Northeastern Health Systems?

    Find your warmest path to Northeastern Health Systems through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Northeastern Health Systems’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home