· Public charity
Amplify Inc
To forge partnerships with people with behavioral health needs, families and our communities to influence best practices, policies and access to resources.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $213,371 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $261,632 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $48,261 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $67k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $146k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AHM YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES | $42,161 |
| TOWN OF ENFIELD DEPT OF SOCIAL SERVICES | $39,142 |
| CATALYST CT INC | $17,565 |
| WINDSOR LOCKS WELLNESS COALITION | $13,693 |
| TOWN OF WEST HARTFORD | $12,142 |
| REGION 10 WELLNESS COALITION | $10,896 |
| SOUTH WINDSOR ALLIANCE FOR FAMILIES | $10,342 |
| TOWN OF TOLLAND | $9,153 |
| TOWN OF EAST WINDSOR | $8,020 |
| BRISTOL PARKS RECREATION YOUTH & COMMUNITY SERVICES | $7,142 |
| SOUTHINGTON STEPS COALITION YOUTH SERVICES | $7,142 |
| TOWN OF MANCHESTER | $7,142 |
| NEW BRITAIN YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES | $7,142 |
| TOWN OF GLASTONBURY | $5,663 |
| FARMINGTON YOUTH SERVICES | $5,342 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
None of your grants could be placed against low income need for this view.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
25 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHANDOVER HEBRON MARLBOROUGH YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC6× · 2020–2025 · $114k · revenue +21%
- MFMCCALL FOUNDATION INC5× · 2020–2025 · $48k · revenue +225%
- CCCATALYST CT INC2× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- EOEast of the Riverone grant, 2018 · $39k
- BPBOLTON PUBLIC SCHOOLSone grant, 2023 · $16k
- TOTOWN OF EAST GRANBYone grant, 2020 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Center for Technology and Civic Life · North Central Area Agency on Aging · Capital Area Substance Abuse Council Inc · Rockville Bank Community Foundation Inc · Connecticut Network for Children and Youth Inc · Wheeler Clinic Inc · The Hometown Foundation Inc · United Way Inc United Way of Cent & Ne Connecticut · AARP · Connecticut Humanities Council Inc · Main Street Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Amplify Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mccall Foundation Inc — 41% of income from government
- Catalyst Ct Inc — 37% of income from government
- Southeastern Regional Action Council Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.