Loading…
· Public charity
Capital Area Substance Abuse Council Inc
To reduce the incidence of substance abuse in the North Central CT Region through research, planning, advocacy and coordination within each town and for the entire region
$151k
Granted FY2018
10
Grants
1
Communities
$11k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 10 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k7 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
$8,973
Median grant
1
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
- Town of Newington$11,163
- Town of Windsor$10,842
- Town of Farmington$10,342
- Town of Avon$9,153
- City of Hartford$8,973
- Town of Granby$8,020
- Town of Canton$8,020
- Town of West Hartford$7,142
- Town of Wethersfield$5,342
- Town of Simsbury$5,342
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
None of your grants could be placed against cost of living need for this view.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
03the grantee network
0 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2018.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
0/0
Grantees still filing
0/0
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$84,339
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Amplify IncCT26.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Amplify Inc · Center for Technology and Civic Life · Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · North Central Area Agency on Aging · The Hometown Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Capital Area Substance Abuse Council Inc?
Find your warmest path to Capital Area Substance Abuse Council Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines