Skip to content
North American Region of the Airports Council International at a glance

· Public charity

North American Region of the Airports Council International

The council exchanges data and information relative to airport design, financing, construction, maintenance and operation.

$108k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$110kEducation$85kCommunity Improvement$78kPublic Benefit$47kPhilanthropy$40kArts & Culture$15kEmployment$5k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $81,750, the rows itemized in this filing. The $108,339 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $26,589 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BRYCE HARLOW FOUNDATION$31,750
GEORGE WASHINGTON'S MOUNT VERNON$15,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$15,000
US CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$10,000
FUTURE BORDERS COALITION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNITED FOR INFRASTRUCTURE: $25k → 14%FUTURE BORDERS COALITION: $10k → 16%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF AIRPORT EXECUTIVES: $5k → 9%COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $8k → 14%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%AIRLINES FOR AMERICA: $30k → 14%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%ACI-NA EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $60k → 14%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%ACI-NA RELEIF FOUNDATION: $40k → 14%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%THE BRYCE HARLOW FOUNDATION: $32k → 14%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $10k → 14%THE BRYCE HARLOW FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%THE BRYCE HARLOW FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$162k · 3 repeat orgs$218k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against -14% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
7

Total granted

$162k
$193k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-14%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $80k · revenue +17%
  • TB
    The Bryce Harlow Foundation
    3× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +29%
  • CO
    Chamber of Commerce of the USA
    2× · 2023–2025 · $35k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • AE
    ACI-NA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue -51% · 41% of their budget
  • AR
    ACI-NA RELIEF FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $40k · revenue -75% · 100% of their budget
  • AT
    AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
2
National Center for Apec

Ncapec is the only u.s. business association focused exclusively on facilitating american private sector input to the apec process. programs typically feature discussions between business, government and academia on key trade and economic…

—
3
National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors

Empowering financial professionals and consumers through world-class advocacy and education.

—
4
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
5
Aacsb International - the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business

Aacsb international provides quality assurance of business school programs, the latest in business education intelligence, thought leadership, and learning and development services.

Education
6
American Arbitration Association Inc

The american arbitration association ("aaa") is dedicated to effective, efficient and economical methods of dispute resolution through education, technology and solutions-oriented service.

Crime & Legal
7
American Council of Engineering Companies

The business association and voice of america's engineering industry, representing thousands of independent u.s. engineering companies engaged in the development of transportation, water, and other public and commercial facilities.

—
8
American Council On Education

Ace leads higher education with a united vision for the future, galvanizing our members to make change. the council collaborates across the sector to design solutions for today's challenges, serves the needs of a diverse student…

Education
9
National Association for College Admission Counseling

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education
10
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
11
Aca International

Aca international contributes to the success of its members, the positive reputation of the industry and the health of the economy. we accomplish this by 1) being the comprehensive, knowledge-based resource for the credit and collection…

—
12
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Us Chamber of Commerce Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Bryce Harlow Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

The Bryce Harlow Foundation: $46,750 · OtherThe Bryce Harlow FoundationChamber of Commerce of the USA: $35,000 · OtherChamber of Commerce of the USAAIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $30,000 · OtherAIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INCUNITED FOR INFRASTRUCTURE: $25,000 · OtherUNITED FOR INFRASTRUCTURECOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $7,500 · OtherAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF AIRPORT EXECUTIVES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherACI-NA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationACI-NA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDA…US Chamber of Commerce Foundation: $25,000 · EducationUS Chamber of Commerce Fo…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $80,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & R…ACI-NA RELIEF FOUNDATION: $40,000 · PhilanthropyACI-NA RELI…THE MOUNT VERNON LADIES' ASSOCIATION OF THE UNION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureFuture Borders Coalition: $10,000 · Community Improvement
Other$149,250Education$85,000Health$80,000Philanthropy$40,000Arts & Culture$15,000Community Improvement$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $80,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetACI-NA EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 1y, 41% of budgetThe Bryce Harlow Foundation: $46,750 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetACI-NA RELIEF FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetChamber of Commerce of the USA: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUS Chamber of Commerce Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED FOR INFRASTRUCTURE: $25,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF AIRPORT EXECUTIVES FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization North American Region of the Airports Council International funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from North American Region of the Airports Council International. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on North American Region of the Airports Council International’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home