Skip to content
North American Insulation Manufacturers Association at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

North American Insulation Manufacturers Association

Naima is the association for north american manufacturers of fiber glass, rock wool, and slag wool insulation products.

$105k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$977kEducation$70kCommunity Improvement$41kPublic Safety & Disaster$8k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $96,909, the rows itemized in this filing. The $105,409 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $8,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY$74,909
AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMY$12,000
RESNET$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%RESNET: $20k → 10%RESNET: $10k → 10%SOUTH-CENTRAL PARTNERSHIP FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AS A RESOURCE: $57k → 10%AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMY: $54k → 14%FIRE SAFE NORTH AMERICA: $8k → 11%KEYSTONE POLICY CENTER: $10k → 9%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ENERGY OFFICIALS: $23k → 7%RESNET: $10k → 10%RESNET: $10k → 10%SOUTH-CENTRAL PARTNERSHIP FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AS A RESOURCE: $29k → 10%AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMY: $32k → 14%RESNET: $10k → 10%SOUTH-CENTRAL PARTNERSHIP FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AS A RESOURCE: $16k → 10%AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMY: $15k → 14%RESNET: $10k → 10%SOUTH-CENTRAL PARTNERSHIP FOR ENERGY EFFICIENCY AS A RESOURCE: $14k → 10%AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMY: $12k → 14%AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMY: $12k → 14%BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY: $30k → 14%BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY: $22k → 14%BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY: $15k → 14%BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY: $10k → 14%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS: $8k → 14%NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS: $8k → 14%ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY: $130k → 14%ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY: $110k → 14%ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY: $90k → 14%ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY: $90k → 14%ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY: $81k → 14%ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY: $75k → 14%ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 7 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
3

Total granted

$1.1M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-5%
+111%

Still filing today

71%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentEducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    AMERICAN COUNCIL FOR AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMY
    5× · 2018–2024 · $125k · revenue +47%
  • BC
    BUSINESS COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
    4× · 2018–2023 · $77k · revenue +42%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES
    3× · 2018–2020 · $15k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ENERGY OFFICIALSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $23k · revenue +97%
  • KC
    KEYSTONE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +111%
  • FS
    FIRE SAFE NORTH AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nw Energy Coalition

The NW Energy Coalition is an alliance of over 100 environmental, civic, and human service organizations, utilities, and businesses in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, and British Columbia, plus many individual members. The NW Energy…

—
2
American Council of Engineering Companies

The business association and voice of america's engineering industry, representing thousands of independent u.s. engineering companies engaged in the development of transportation, water, and other public and commercial facilities.

—
3
California Energy Alliance

The California Energy Alliance (CEA) unites representatives of a broad range of organizations concerned about energy and the build environment. As a member-based organization, CEA works to improve California's energy future and migration…

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Smart Electric Power Alliance

The Smart Electric Power Alliance (SEPA) is an educational nonprofit working to accelerate the transition to a clean, affordable, and resilient energy system for all.SEPA collaborates with over 1,000 member organizations across the…

Environment
5
National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners

Founded in 1889, the national association of regulatory utility commisioners (naruc) is a non-profit organization dedicated to representing the state public service commisions who regulate the utilities that provide essential services such…

—
6
North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners Inc

To support, and work with, the renewable energy and energy efficiency industries, professionals, and stakeholders and is intended to develop and implement quality credentialing and certification programs for practitioners.

Community Improvement
7
American Council On Renewable Energy

The American Council on Renewable Energy (ACORE) is a 501 (c)(3) national nonprofit organization that unites finance, policy and technology to accelerate the transition to a renewable energy economy.

Science & Tech
8
United States Association for Energy Economics Inc

The united states association for energy economics, inc. (usaee) is a non-profit organization of business government, academic and other professionals that advances the understanding and application of economics across all facets of energy…

—
9
Northwest Energy Efficiency Council

To eliminate carbon emissions from building energy use through market based thought leadership, education, and advocacy.

—
10
EnerGeo Alliance

EnerGeo Alliance optimizes the business and regulatory climate and enhances public understanding to support a strong, viable energy geoscience industry essential to discovering and delivering the world's energy resources.EnerGeo Alliance's…

—
11
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
12
United States Energy Association Inc

The united states energy association (usea) is an association of public and private energy-related organizations, corporations, and government agencies. usea represents the broad interest of the u.s. energy sector by increasing the…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Association of State Energy Officials; the most unlike its peers is Resnet Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY: $625,659 · EnvironmentALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGYAMERICAN COUNCIL FOR AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMY: $125,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN COUNCIL FOR AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMYThe South-Central Partnership for Energy Efficiency as a Resource: $116,392 · EnvironmentThe South-Central Partnership for Energy Efficiency as a Resource+1 more: $10,000 · EnvironmentBUSINESS COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY: $77,000 · Community ImprovementNorth Carolina Building Performance Asso: $26,000 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ENERGY OFFICIALS: $22,500 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES: $15,000 · OtherFIRE SAFE NORTH AMERICA: $7,500 · OtherRESNET INC: $70,000 · Education
Environment$877,051Community Improvement$77,000Other$71,000Education$70,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALLIANCE TO SAVE ENERGY: $625,659 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetAMERICAN COUNCIL FOR AN ENERGY-EFFICIENT ECONOMY: $125,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetThe South-Central Partnership for Energy Efficiency as a Resource: $116,392 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetBUSINESS COUNCIL FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY: $77,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetRESNET INC: $70,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetNorth Carolina Building Performance Asso: $26,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE ENERGY OFFICIALS: $22,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HOME BUILDERS OF THE UNITED STATES: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKEYSTONE CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Energy FoundationDonor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Energy FoundationCA13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Energy Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization North American Insulation Manufacturers Association funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from North American Insulation Manufacturers Association. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on North American Insulation Manufacturers Association’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home