Skip to content
Norman Youth Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Norman Youth Foundation Inc

Benefit the welfare of children

$87k
Granted FY2019
4
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Education$64kHealth$56kYouth Development$45kHuman Services$40kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2019 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $58,400, the rows itemized in this filing. The $86,750 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $28,350 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $43k
$20,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$15k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TERRA VERDE DISCOVERY SCHOOL$23,000
LOVEWORKS LEADERSHIP INC$20,400
TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION$7,500
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $40k → 13%CENTER FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $25k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$147k · 3 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +211% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2019, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
5

Total granted

$147k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+211%
+26%

Still filing today

100%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyEmploymentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $65k · revenue +60%
  • TV
    Terra Verde Discovery School Inc
    3× · 2017–2019 · $64k · revenue +371%
  • TT
    THE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $18k · revenue +211%

Funded once

  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +26%
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +29%
  • SH
    SOONERS HELPING SOONERS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Cure Cmd

Cure CMDs mission is to advance research toward treatments for the congenital muscular dystrophies and empower those living with CMD through engagement and support of our community.

Health
4
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
5
CSNK2A1 Foundation

Focus on finding a cure for okur-chung neurodevelopmental syndrome and ensuring individuals have the opportunities and support necessary for happy and full lives.

Health
6
Children's Research Institute

Children's research institute dba children's national research institute conducts and promotes translational and clinical medical research and education programs that lead to improved understanding, prevention, treatment, and care of…

Health
7
Columbus Children's Foundation

Accelerating the most effective gene therapy treatments for children with ultra-rare diseases.

Health
8
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Therapeutics Inc

The mission is to cure cystic fibrosis and to provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives.

Science & Tech
9
Moody Medical Research Institute
—
10
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
11
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
12
Children's Cancer Fund of Dallas inc

Children's cancer fund champions kids in their fight against cancer through strategic investments in research and care in north texas.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Medical Research Inc; the most unlike its peers is Terra Verde Discovery School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INCTerra Verde Discovery School Inc: $64,000 · EducationTerra Verde Discovery School IncAmerican Heart Association Inc: $15,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Assoc…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $11,080 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUN…CHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC: $7,500 · HealthCHILDREN'S MEDICAL R…NICOLE JARVIS MD PARKINSONS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · HealthNICOLE JARVIS MD PAR…Loveworks Leadership Inc: $20,400 · Youth DevelopmentLoveworks …THE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 · PhilanthropyTHE TOBY …SOONERS HELPING SOONERS INC: $5,000 · EmploymentSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$65,000Education$64,000Health$38,580Youth Development$20,400Philanthropy$17,500Employment$5,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $65,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTerra Verde Discovery School Inc: $64,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetLoveworks Leadership Inc: $20,400 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetTHE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC: $17,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $11,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOONERS HELPING SOONERS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNICOLE JARVIS MD PARKINSONS RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Fidelity Fou…Communities Foundatio…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
American Fidelity FoundationOK15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Fidelity Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norman Youth Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norman Youth Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $93k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Norman Youth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home