Skip to content

· Private foundation

Norman H Helms Jr Charitable Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$48kReligion$39kHuman Services$28kFood & Nutrition$15kHealth$14kEducation$9kInternational$6kArts & Culture$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$27k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK$2,000
GIRLS HAVEN$2,000
ST JUDE HOSPITAL$2,000
COMMUNITY-CARE PRAYER$2,000
SOME OTHER PLACE$2,000
NUTRITION SERVICES FOR SENIORS$2,000
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$2,000
SALVATION ARMY$2,000
CATHOLIC CHARTIES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS$2,000
SAMARITANS PURSE$2,000
GOLDEN TRIANGLE AUDUBON SOCIETY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2k → 19%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2k → 19%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2k → 19%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $2k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARTIES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $2k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARTIES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS: $2k → 19%GIRLS HAVEN: $2k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $2k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $2k → 19%GIRLS HAVEN: $1k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$153k · 16 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
5

Total granted

$153k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+41%

Still filing today

38%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationReligionHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ST
    Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc
    4× · 2022–2025 · $8k · revenue +16%
  • PA
    PORT ARTHUR HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $7k · revenue +117%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $6k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • TM
    TRINITY METHODIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • MO
    MUSEUM OF THE GULF COAST
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • TT
    TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDAATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sunny Glen Children's Home Inc

Sunny Glen Childrens Home, Inc. cares for children in need. Our care will be competent, compassionate and professional. We will help every child achieve their greatest potential-physically, emotionally, spiritually and academically.

Human Services
2
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
3
Christus Health Foundation of Southeast Texas

Christus health foundation of southeast texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast texas.

—
4
Hospice of South Texas Inc

Hospice care of terminally ill patients

—
5
The Lullaby House

The Lullaby House missionis ot strengthen families by providing programs and services to teenage parents and familites in need which will inspire and promote generational change.

Youth Development
6
South Texas Food Bank

To alleviate hunger in the immediate service area through the distribution of food products donated by the usda, feeding america, area grocery stores, etc. which are distributed to the needy by way of area food banks and other qualified…

Community Improvement
7
Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Galveston - Houston

Guided by god's love, catholic charities helps people in southeast texas by providing caring, compassionate services and advocating for social justice in collaboration with parishes and communities.

Human Services
8
Texas Palliative Care

Texas palliative care operates to strengthen and further the goals and purpose of hospice of east texas, a texas non-profit corporation.

Health
9
Catholic Charities- Diocese of Tyler

Catholic charities-diocese of tyler is a servant of the body of christ engaged in works of mercy to ease suffering of the poor, the hungry, the naked, the sick, the homeless, the immigrant, the least amoung us, our brethren in east texas.…

Philanthropy
10
Hendrick Home for Children
—
11
Southwestern Health Resources

To further the missions of utsw and thr on a local, regional and national level through the creation of a clinically integrated network of physicians, hospitals and other care providers to deliver healthcare across the continuum and by…

Health
12
Southwestern Health Resources Hospitals Joc

To create an integrated hospital system operating in the dallas area to improve the health of the people in the communities it serves without regard to their ability to pay.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Children's Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS: $48,432 · OtherOTHER CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONSHOLY TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $24,050 · OtherHOLY TRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCHNUTRITION SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $7,000 · OtherNUTRITION SERVICES FOR SENIORSCOMMUNITY-CARE PRAYER: $7,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY-CARE PRAYERST JUDE HOSPITAL: $7,000 · OtherST JUDE HOSPITALSALVATION ARMY: $7,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYST STEPHENS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $6,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALS: $5,000 · Other+7 more: $14,000 · Other+7 moreSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $8,000 · Human ServicesSoutheast Texa…Some Other Place: $6,000 · Human ServicesSome Other Pla…Catholic Charities of Southeast Texas: $4,000 · Human ServicesCatholic Chari…GIRLS' HAVEN INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS' HAVEN I…PORT ARTHUR HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6,000 · ReligionTexas Children's Hospital: $1,000 · Health
Other$125,482Human Services$21,000Education$9,000Religion$6,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPORT ARTHUR HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetSome Other Place: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCatholic Charities of Southeast Texas: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS' HAVEN INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds PORT ARTHUR HIGHER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Some Other Place ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Catholic Charities of Southeast Texas ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS' HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norman H Helms Jr Charitable Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norman H Helms Jr Charitable Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Norman H Helms Jr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph