Skip to content

· Private foundation

Norman and Ann Hoffman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$370k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$3.2MEducation$1.1MReligion$435kHousing & Shelter$60kYouth Development$50kCommunity Improvement$25kHuman Services$23kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $170k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $200k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ND ALUMNI ASSO FOUNDATION$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$50,000
BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE$30,000
MY VERY OWN BED$30,000
HOLY FAMILY HIGH CATHOLIC SCHOOL$25,000
ST PAUL SEMINARY SCHOOL OF DIVINITY$25,000
ASCENSION CATHOLIC SCHOOL$20,000
ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
LIBRARY FOUNDATION-CARVER COUNTY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $5k → 11%SHARING & CARING HANDS: $5k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $3k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $3k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $3k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $3k → 11%SHARING AND CARING HANDS: $3k → 11%SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $10k → 11%SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $10k → 11%SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $10k → 11%SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.6M · 18 repeat orgs$267k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
8

Total granted

$4.6M
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-1%

Still filing today

39%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPhilanthropyHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $3.0M · revenue +43% · 63% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $338k · revenue +111%
  • SD
    ST DAVID'S CENTER
    2× · 2023–2024 · $50k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • TS
    THE SAINT PAUL SEMINARY
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
3
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

—
4
Midwest Dairy Association

Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.

—
5
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

—
6
Avivo

Avivo increases well-being through recovery and career advancement while working to end homelessness.

Human Services
7
Minnesota State University Student Association Inc

Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…

Education
8
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
9
The Foundation for Health Care Continuums

The mission of the foundation for health care continuums is to strengthen each community we serve by providing a wide spectrum of housing and health care services that honor the evolving, aging population.

Health
10
Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce

Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.

—
11
Minneapolis Downtown Council

To create an extraordinary downtown minneapolis, applying the core values of leadership, collaboration, advocacy and innovation.

—
12
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION: $3,000,000 · PhilanthropyRIDGEVIEW FOUNDATIONNET MINISTRIES: $240,000 · OtherNET MINISTRIESST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH: $170,000 · OtherST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCHUNIVERSITY OF ND ALUMNI ASSO FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ND ALUMNI ASS…ST PAUL SEMINARY SCHOOL OF DIVINITY: $125,000 · OtherST PAUL SEMINARY SCHOOL OF …HOLY FAMILY HIGH SCHOOL INC: $75,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY HIGH SCHOOL INCST PAUL SEMINARY SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherST PAUL SEMINARY SCHOOLHOLY FAMILY HIGH CATHOLIC SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY HIGH CATHOLIC S…UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION: $70,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA …HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherASCENSION CATHOLIC GRADE SCHOOL: $43,000 · Other+10 more: $127,105 · Other+10 moreUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $337,920 · Education+1 more: $1,850 · EducationAmerican Diabetes Association: $175,000 · HealthSOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $35,000 · Human ServicesSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $22,500 · Human ServicesBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE: $30,000 · Community ImprovementTHE FREEDOM FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA: $25,000 · Community ImprovementST DAVID'S CENTER: $50,000 · Youth Development
Philanthropy$3,000,000Other$1,200,105Education$339,770Health$175,000Human Services$57,500Community Improvement$55,000Youth Development$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION: $3,000,000 over 2y, 63% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $337,920 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $175,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST DAVID'S CENTER: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN: $35,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetBEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMy Very Own Bed: $30,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE FREEDOM FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA: $25,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $22,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $1,850 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $875 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RIDGEVIEW FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds ST DAVID'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST OPTIONS FOR WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds BEACON INTERFAITH HOUSING COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds My Very Own Bed ↗
  • Who funds THE FREEDOM FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds VITERBO UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN YOUTH SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN18.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · United Way Worldwide · Otto Bremer Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · American Gift Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norman and Ann Hoffman Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norman and Ann Hoffman Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Norman and Ann Hoffman Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph