Skip to content

· Private foundation

Noris Foundation co Marion Thurnauer

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$565k
Granted FY2017
12
Grants FY2017
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2017

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $200k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $365k
$30,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Evans Scholars Foundation$150,000
BOTANICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA$110,000
Guide Dogs for the Blind$105,000
PS 295 Parent Teacher Association I$47,000
Students Rising Above$30,000
Oregon State University Foundation$30,000
Meals on Wheels of Boulder Inc$20,000
Boulder Philharmonic Orchestra$18,000
MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION$15,000
Best Friends Animal Society$15,000
Zoological Society of San Diego$15,000
UNIVERSITY SECTION CLUB INC$10,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–17) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY SECTION CLUB INC: $10k → 10%Students Rising Above: $30k → 10%MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%PS 295 Parent Teacher Association I: $47k → 20%Oregon State University Foundation: $30k → 18%Best Friends Animal Society: $15k → 9%Meals on Wheels of Boulder Inc: $20k → 12%Evans Scholars Foundation: $150k → 14%Boulder Philharmonic Orchestra: $18k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Zoological Society

To connect all people with wildlife, inspire caring for nature, and advance conservation action.

Animals
2
California Academy of Sciences

The academy is a renowned scientific and educational institution with a mission to regenerate the natural world through science, learning, and collaboration. based in san francisco's golden gate park, it is home to a world-class aquarium,…

Arts & Culture
3
Sacramento Zoological Society

The sacramento zoo inspires appreciation, respect and a connection with wildlife and nature through education, recreation and conservation.

Animals
4
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
5
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
6
San Francisco Botanical Garden Society At Strybing Arboretum

Gardens of golden gate park connects people to plants, the planet, and each other. the gardens offer educational and experiential programs for visitors and actively manages the living collections.

Environment
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
8
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute
—
9
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
10
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
11
Seattle Symphony Orchestra Inc

To present symphonic music of the highest quality in a distinctive way for the cultural enrichment, education, engagement and enjoyment of the people of our community.

Arts & Culture
12
Ecological Society of America

The ecological society of america (esa) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization of scientists founded in 1915 to: promote ecological science by improving communication among ecologists; raise the public's level of awareness of the…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Guide Dogs for the Blind Inc; the most unlike its peers is P S 295 Parent Teacher Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Evans Scholars Foundation: $150,000 · OtherEvans Scholars FoundationUniversity Section Club Inc: $10,000 · OtherUniversity Section Club IncBOTANICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC: $110,000 · EnvironmentBOTANICAL SOCIETY OF A…GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $105,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BL…P S 295 PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION INC: $47,000 · EducationP S 295 PARENT …Oregon State University Foundation: $30,000 · EducationOregon State Un…MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $15,000 · AnimalsMONTEREY …BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $15,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIE…ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $15,000 · AnimalsZOOLOGICA…FOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $30,000 · PhilanthropyMEALS ON WHEELS OF BOULDER INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionBOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $18,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$160,000Environment$110,000Human Services$105,000Education$77,000Animals$45,000Philanthropy$30,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Arts & Culture$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOTANICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC: $110,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $105,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF BOULDER INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBOULDER PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA: $18,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetMONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Noris Foundation co Marion Thurnauer funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Noris Foundation co Marion Thurnauer. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Noris Foundation co Marion Thurnauer?

Find your warmest path to Noris Foundation co Marion Thurnauer through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2018) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Noris Foundation co Marion Thurnauer’s filings →

More from the funding graph