Skip to content

· Public charity

Norcal AIDS Challenge

NCAC raises funds and awareness to support organizations in Northern California to end the HIV/AIDS pandemic and care for those living with and affected by HIV/AIDS.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$439kHuman Services$165kFood & Nutrition$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $72,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $90,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $18,000 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$98k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sunburst Projects$12,000
Sierra Foothills AIDS Foundat$11,000
Golden Rule Services$9,000
Healing Waters$9,000
HARM Reduction Services$9,000
SANE$9,000
Gender Health Center$6,500
Sierra Hope$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Caring Choices: $10k → 18%Caring Choices: $10k → 18%Caring Choices: $10k → 18%Caring Choices: $6k → 18%Golden Rule Services: $20k → 12%Golden Rule Services: $18k → 12%Golden Rule Services: $14k → 12%Golden Rule Services: $10k → 12%Golden Rule Services: $10k → 12%Golden Rule Services: $9k → 12%Golden Rule Services: $8k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$653k · 12 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
0

Total granted

$653k
$0

Still filing today

67%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    Sunburst Projects
    7× · 2017–2025 · $94k · revenue +174%
  • GR
    Golden Rule Services
    7× · 2017–2025 · $89k · revenue +282%
  • SF
    SIERRA FOOTHILLS AIDS FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +67%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
    Civil Rights
    2
    Primary Care at Home Inc

    We provide healthcare and health management services in the Oakland, California Bay Area. We seek to recognize, empathize, and correctly respond to clients individual needs both medically and psychosocially. Everyone in our care is treated…

    Health
    3
    Harm Reduction Coalition of Santa Cruz County

    Harm Reduction Coalition of Santa Cruz County operates a state-authorized Syringe Service Program. This program distributes complimentary syringes, sharps containers, wound care items, etc. to low-income and homeless individuals in our…

    Health
    4
    Northern Nevada Hiv Outpatient Program Education and Services

    Northern Nevada Hopes provides affordable, high-quality, medical, behavioral health, and support services for all. We are dedicated to building a healthier community by providing coordinated care and support for individuals and family…

    Health
    5
    Needle Exchange Emergencydistribution

    NEED reduces the spread of Hepatitis C, HIV, and other blood-borne pathogens due to injection drug use by providing free, clean syringes and injection supplies, as well as education and training on issues relevant to injection drug users,…

    Health
    6
    Southern Arizona Aids Foundation

    To promote health, well-being, and social justice for those living with HIV, LGBTQ+ individuals, and communities marginalized by society.

    Health
    7
    Dap Health Inc

    To enhance and promote the health and wellbeing of the community.

    Health
    8
    Aids Project of the East Bay

    Aids project of the east bay (apeb) is focused on the prevention of the spread of hiv and supports individuals living with the virus through programs targeted at some of the most vulnerable and marginalized individuals. apeb seeks to…

    Health
    9
    San Francisco Aids Foundation

    San francisco aids foundation promotes health, wellness, and social justice for communities most impacted by hiv, through sexual health and substance use services, advocacy, and community partnerships.

    —
    10
    Healthy Community Forum for Sacramento Region dba Community HealthWorks

    Healthy Community Forum for the Greater Sacramento Region operates under the name Community HealthWorks (formally Sacramento Covered), a not-for-profit philanthropic organization, is an innovative leader in developing and implementing a…

    Health
    11
    Sacramento Recovery House Inc

    Sacramento Recovery House, Inc., is dedicated to providing gender responsive, trauma informed, residential services to adult persons seeking recovery from substance use disorders.

    Health
    12
    Hawaii Health & Harm Reduction Center

    Hhhrc serves hawai'i communities by reducing the harm and fighting the stigma of hiv, hepatitis, homelessness, substance use, mental illness, and poverty in our community. hhhrc focuses our efforts on those disproportionately affected by…

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sierra Foothills Aids Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Caring Choices Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    6
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    9/9
    Grantees still filing
    7/9
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    Sunburst Projects: $94,000 · OtherSunburst ProjectsSANE: $63,000 · OtherSANEHEALING WATERS INC: $51,000 · OtherHEALING WATERS INCSacramento LGBT Center: $25,000 · OtherSacramento LGBT CenterNevada County Public Health: $21,000 · OtherNevada County Public HealthSIERRA FOOTHILLS AIDS FOUNDATION: $79,500 · HealthSIERRA FOOTHILLS AIDS FOUN…GENDER HEALTH CENTER: $69,250 · HealthGENDER HEALTH CENTERSTRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: $14,500 · HealthSTRATEGIES FOR CHANGEGolden Rule Services: $89,000 · Human ServicesGolden Rule ServicesCaring Choices Inc: $36,000 · Human ServicesCaring Choices IncHARM REDUCTION SERVICES INC: $74,000 · Civil RightsHARM REDUCTI…SIERRA HOPE: $51,000 · Youth DevelopmentRIVER CITY FOOD BANK: $22,000 · Community Improvement
    Other$254,000Health$163,250Human Services$125,000Civil Rights$74,000Youth Development$51,000Community Improvement$22,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSunburst Projects: $94,000 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetGolden Rule Services: $89,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetSIERRA FOOTHILLS AIDS FOUNDATION: $79,500 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetHARM REDUCTION SERVICES INC: $74,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetGENDER HEALTH CENTER: $69,250 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetSIERRA HOPE: $51,000 over 6y, 2.5% of budgetCaring Choices Inc: $36,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetRIVER CITY FOOD BANK: $22,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSTRATEGIES FOR CHANGE: $14,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds Sunburst Projects ↗
    • Who funds Golden Rule Services ↗
    • Who funds SIERRA FOOTHILLS AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds HARM REDUCTION SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds GENDER HEALTH CENTER ↗
    • Who funds SIERRA HOPE ↗
    • Who funds Caring Choices Inc ↗
    • Who funds RIVER CITY FOOD BANK ↗
    • Who funds STRATEGIES FOR CHANGE ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    Cares FoundationCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Cares Foundation · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Norcal AIDS Challenge funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norcal AIDS Challenge. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Norcal AIDS Challenge?

      Find your warmest path to Norcal AIDS Challenge through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Norcal AIDS Challenge’s filings →

      More from the funding graph