Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nopec Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2020
20
Grants FY2020
1
States reached
$56k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Nopec Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to The Cleveland Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Nopec Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 14 organizations, $125k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

14
’20
0
’22
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$3.3MFood & Nutrition$97kHuman Services$25kHousing & Shelter$1k
02FY2020 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k17 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$2,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$6.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$56,486
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$13,237
MCKINLEY COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER$12,022
FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC$5,055
AKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK INC$5,000
COUNTRY NEIGHBOR PROGRAM INC$4,835
GEAUGA HUNGER TASK FORCE$4,191
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK MAHONING VALLEY$4,000
WEST OHIO FOOD BANK$2,000
LANCASTER FOOD PANTRY$2,000
SECOND HARVEST FOOD PANTRY$2,000
ATHENS COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$2,000
ALLIANCE COMMUNITY PANTRY INC$2,000
RICHLAND COUNTY FOUNDATION$2,000
NORWALK AREA FOOD PANTRY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BRUNSWICK FOOD PANTRY INC: $500 → 7%FAMILY AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5k → 12%ALLIANCE COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $2k → 13%COUNTRY NEIGHBOR PROGRAM INC: $5k → 17%THE EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE CENTER: $1k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Medina County Food Pantry

Provide emergency food for those in need.

Human Services
2
Toledo Northwestern Ohio Food Bank

To enable other community organizations to end hunger. we strive to maximize community resources by effectively obtaining and distributing food through a food collection and distribution system.

Food & Nutrition
3
Stark County Hunger Task Force Inc

Fight hunger in our community by providing financial, logistic, strategic, and food support to our network of local emergency food pantries.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Food Pantry Network of Licking County

Distribution of food to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
5
Sheboygan County Food Bank Inc

Lead sheboygan county's efforts to increase the food security of its residents by distributing healthy emergency food and fostering innovative partnerships.

Food & Nutrition
6
Hilliard Food Pantry Plus

Hilliard Food Pantry Plus mission is to improve the well-being of our community by providing food and support

—
7
Oshkosh Area Community Pantry Inc

The oshkosh area community pantry strives to eliminate food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
8
Mid-Ohio Foodbank

Mid-Ohio Foodbanks mission is to end hunger one nourishing meal at a time while co-creating communities where everyone thrives.

—
9
Burlington Township Food Pantry

The Burlington Township Food Pantry offers food assistance to those in need, who live, work or worship in Burlington Township.

Education
10
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
11
Cooperstown Food Pantry Inc

The mission of the cooperstown food pantry is to address issues of poverty and hunger in otsego county.

Food & Nutrition
12
Community Food Bank

To fight hunger and poverty by providing food, education, programs and resources to families in a dignified, personal and expeditious manner directly as a food pantry and as a food bank; without zip code restrictions.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akron-Canton Regional Foodbank; the most unlike its peers is Brunswick Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION: $3,250,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $56,486 · Food & NutritionAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $5,000 · Food & NutritionGEAUGA COUNTY HUNGER TASK FORCE: $4,191 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THE MAHONING VALLEY: $4,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more: $3,648 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $13,237 · OtherATHENS COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $2,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD PANTRY: $2,000 · OtherLANCASTER FOOD PANTRY: $2,000 · OtherNORWALK AREA FOOD PANTRY: $2,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY OF WARREN CORPS: $1,500 · OtherFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,055 · Human ServicesCOUNTRY NEIGHBOR PROGRAM INC: $4,835 · Human ServicesALLIANCE COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $1,460 · Human ServicesBrunswick Food Pantry Inc: $500 · Human ServicesMcKinley Community Outreach Center: $12,022 · Community ImprovementWARREN FAMILY MISSION: $1,066 · Housing & Shelter
Philanthropy$3,252,000Food & Nutrition$73,325Other$22,737Human Services$13,850Community Improvement$12,022Housing & Shelter$1,066

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION: $3,250,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $56,486 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMcKinley Community Outreach Center: $12,022 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $5,055 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAKRON-CANTON REGIONAL FOODBANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNTRY NEIGHBOR PROGRAM INC: $4,835 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGEAUGA COUNTY HUNGER TASK FORCE: $4,191 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF THE MAHONING VALLEY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetATHENS COUNTY FOOD PANTRY: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRICHLAND COUNTY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE COMMUNITY PANTRY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWest Ohio Food Bank: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING MEDINA COUNTY: $1,648 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC: $1,460 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWARREN FAMILY MISSION: $1,066 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron-Canton Regional FoodbankOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron-Canton Regional Foodbank · The Swagelok Foundation · The Westfield Insurance Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nopec Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nopec Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nopec Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Nopec Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nopec’s filings →

    More from the funding graph