Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Nonprofit Finance Fund

NONPROFIT FINANCE FUND is a nonprofit lender, consultant, and advocate.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Community Improvement$4.1MHealth$1.6MHuman Services$1.2MHousing & Shelter$1.1MPublic Benefit$1.1MEmployment$962kArts & Culture$943kFood & Nutrition$685kOther$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k15 grants · $375k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $700k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$260M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLASHAN MCCUNE$100,000
RUTGERS THE STATE U-FEB 2024$100,000
THE ROAD CALLED STRATE$100,000
MOYO NGUVU CULTUREAL ARTS CENTER$50,000
NEWARK TRUST FOR EDUCATION INC$50,000
NEWARK ARTS COUNCIL$50,000
YOUTHBUILD NEWARK INC$50,000
BURMESE ROHINGYA ASSOCIATION USA$50,000
NEWARK ALLIANCE INC$50,000
UNITED WAY OF GREATER NEWARK$50,000
JUNTOS COMMUNITY$50,000
FULL CIRCLE OF LAKE COUNTY INC$25,000
BREANN DONNELLY$25,000
MONTBELLO 2020 RNO$25,000
VICTORY PROJECTS BASED ACADEMICS & COMPETENCY$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALONG THE WAY INC: $30k → 7%THERESA PETTAWAY: $30k → 10%INTERFACE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $105k → 10%THE ILLUMINATION FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER DBA THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $13k → 14%AFRICAN REFUGE INC: $13k → 11%MEKONG INC: $13k → 28%ENDING COMMUNITY HOMELESSNNESS COALITION: $235k → 10%WISCONSIN ALLIANCE FOR INFANT MENTAL HEALTH INC: $10k → 10%PLASHAN MCCUNE: $100k → 8%EL CENTRO AMISTAD: $25k → 12%LA CASA DE DON PEDRO: $105k → 16%THOMAS JEFFERSON AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $83k → 8%MACC ALLIANCE OF CONNECTED COMMUNITIES: $83k → 11%INTERFACE CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $85k → 10%ENDING COMMUNITY HOMELESSNNESS COALITION: $85k → 10%PLASHAN MCCUNE: $50k → 8%EL CENTRO AMISTAD: $25k → 12%LA CASA DE DON PEDRO: $85k → 16%THOMAS JEFFERSON AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS: $40k → 8%METROPOLITAN ALLIANCE OF CONNECTED COMMUNITES: $40k → 11%PROJECT HOME: $197k → 22%UNA MANO UNA ESPERANZA: $25k → 12%SOCIAL FINANCE INC: $113k → 16%FOSTERING CHANGE FOR CHILDREN: $13k → 20%UNA MANO UNA ESPERANZA: $25k → 12%LA CASA DE DON PEDRO INC: $55k → 16%SOCIAL FINANCE INC: $100k → 16%PROJECT HOME: $28k → 22%BROADWAY ADVOCACY COALITION: $19k → 17%EL GRUPO VIDA INC: $25k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $110k → 16%EL GRUPO VIDA INC: $25k → 12%URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY: $55k → 16%SPECIAL SERVICE FOR GROUPS INC (SSG): $13k → 14%UNIFIED VAILSBURG SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $135k → 16%UNIFIED VAILSBURG SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $77k → 16%UNIFIED VAILSBURG SERVICES ORGANIZATION: $55k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC: $125k → 16%ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY: $105k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC: $35k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
SC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$10M · 59 repeat orgs$3.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +67% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

59 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
78

Total granted

$10M
$3.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+67%
+31%

Still filing today

88%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THIRD SECTOR CAPITAL PARTNERS INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1.4M · revenue +72%
  • BME NETWORKS INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $765k · revenue +35%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $493k · revenue +130%

Funded once

  • AN
    AMERICAN NONPROFITS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $332k · revenue +80% · 94% of their budget
  • CV
    COMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTING
    one grant, 2021 · $233k · revenue +19%
  • AN
    ARS NOVA WORKSHOP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $180k · revenue +32%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mid-City Community Advocacy Network

Mid-city community advocacy network works to build a safe, productive, and healthy community for the residents of city heights and greater san diego through collaboration, advocacy, and organizing.

Community Improvement
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
African Com Public Health Coalition

To improve personal and community health and wellness within the african community by increasing the availability of culturally relevant physical and mental health services.

Health
4
Cityworks Dc

Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…

Education
5
Children's Council of San Francisco

By advocating for quality early care and education, empowering families with information and financial support, and building the capabilities of educators, Children's Council of San Francisco ensures that every child in San Francisco has…

Human Services
6
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
7
Los Angeles Black Worker Center

The mission of the Los Angeles Black Worker Center is to increase access to quality jobs, reduce employment discrimination, and improve industries that employ black workers through action and unionization.

Employment
8
Inclusive Communities Project

Promote fair and affordable housing for low income families, free from the vestiges of segregation and discrimination.

Housing & Shelter
9
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
10
CommonHealth Action

CommonHealth ACTION develops people and organizations to produce health through equitable policies, programs, and practices.

Health
11
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health
12
Initiative for a Competitive Inner City Inc

Icic drives inclusive economic prosperity in under-resourced communities through innovative research and programs to create jobs, income, and wealth for local residents.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Ward Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Belmont Alliance Civic Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsCommunity College Foundatio…Environmental Conservation …Christian Missionary Organi…Youth Development ServicesUnited Way AffiliatesAffordable Housing Developm…Faith-Based Social ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportPregnancy Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity FoundationsHealth Access Advocacy and …Elementary Literacy TutoringDance Arts OrganizationsLocal History MuseumsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Arts Centers
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%10%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%34%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/139
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,426

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

119 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 119 of the 139 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
41
Early backer (in before they grew)
116/119
Grantees still filing
89/119
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Ending Community Homelessness Coalition Inc — $320,362 · Human ServicesEnding Community Home…UNIFIED VAILSBURG SERVICES ORGANIZATION — $266,500 · Human ServicesUNIFIED VAILSBURG SER…La Casa De Don Pedro Inc — $245,000 · Human ServicesLa Casa De Don Pedro …PROJECT HOME — $225,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOMESocial Finance Inc — $213,366 · Human ServicesSocial Finance IncInterface Children Family Services — $190,407 · Human ServicesInterface Children Fa…URBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY — $165,000 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX…THE NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC — $160,000 · Human ServicesTHE NEW JERSEY INSTIT…HIGHER LEARNING U INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesHIGHER LEARNING U INCBLUE RIDGE AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS — $123,333 · Human ServicesMetropolitan Alliance of Connected Communities — $123,333 · Human ServicesADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY — $105,000 · Human Services+14 more — $364,666 · Human Services+14 moreSLCO PFS 1 INC — $250,000 · OtherSLCO PFS 1 INCNEWARK ARTS COUNCIL — $241,500 · OtherAlameda County Board of Supervisors — $220,567 · OtherRUTGERS THE STATE UNIVERSITY — $201,500 · OtherGREEN AND HEALTHY HOMES INITATIVE — $181,098 · OtherCOUNTY OF VENTURA-AUDITOR — $170,504 · OtherNewark Trust for Education Inc — $163,500 · OtherAMERICAN NONPROFITS INC — $332,133 · OtherAMERICAN NONPROFITS INCTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC — $201,500 · OtherABODE SERVICES — $245,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR CHILD SUCCESS INC — $238,802 · OtherCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC — $230,000 · Other+58 more — $1,978,421 · Other+58 moreBME NETWORKS INC — $765,000 · Community ImprovementBME NETWORKS INCCOMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTING — $232,533 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY VISION CA…GREATER NEWARK ENTERPRISES CORP — $205,000 · Community ImprovementGREATER NEWARK ENTE…HISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $180,000 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC FEDERATION…CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NEW YORK CITY INC — $180,000 · Community ImprovementCITIZENS COMMITTEE …LINCOLN PARK COAST CULTURAL DISTRICT INC — $165,000 · Community ImprovementLINCOLN PARK COAST …COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND INC — $130,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY REINVESTM…CALVERT IMPACT CAPITAL INC — $130,000 · Community ImprovementCALVERT IMPACT CAPI…COMMUNITY PARTNERS — $105,665 · Community Improvement+7 more — $280,160 · Community Improvement+7 moreTHIRD SECTOR CAPITAL PARTNERS INC — $1,358,383 · Public BenefitTHIRD SECTOR CAP…CAPITAL IMPACT PARTNERS — $400,000 · Public BenefitCAPITAL IMPACT P…Leadership Newark Inc — $201,700 · Public BenefitLeadership Newar…+2 more — $79,441 · Public BenefitNEWARK PERFORMING ARTS CORPORATION — $186,500 · Arts & CultureNEWARK PUBLIC RADIO INC — $186,500 · Arts & CultureARS NOVA WORKSHOP INC — $180,429 · Arts & CultureTHE NEWARK MUSEUM ASSOCIATION — $135,000 · Arts & CultureMOYO NGUVU CULTURAL ART CENTER INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureKIDS AT THEIR BEST INC — $50,000 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $40,500 · Arts & CultureMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA — $492,604 · Food & NutritionCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $105,000 · Food & NutritionCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES AUXILIARY SERVICES INC — $122,030 · EducationBUILDING RESPONSIBLE INTELLIGENT CREATIVE KIDS — $120,000 · EducationVictory Project-based Academics & Competency — $50,000 · EducationFULL CIRCLE RESTORATIVE JUSTICE — $50,000 · EducationRed Wind Consulting Inc — $50,000 · EducationTREE HOUSE BOOKS — $40,000 · EducationMIGHTY WRITERS — $30,000 · Education+4 more — $39,400 · Education
Human Services$2,651,967Other$4,654,525Community Improvement$2,373,358Public Benefit$2,039,524Arts & Culture$878,929Food & Nutrition$597,604Education$501,430

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHIRD SECTOR CAPITAL PARTNERS INC — $1,358,383 over 2y, 10% of budgetBME NETWORKS INC — $765,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AMERICA — $492,604 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCAPITAL IMPACT PARTNERS — $400,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN NONPROFITS INC — $332,133 over 1y, 94% of budgetEnding Community Homelessness Coalition Inc — $320,362 over 2y, 7.1% of budgetUNIFIED VAILSBURG SERVICES ORGANIZATION — $266,500 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetLa Casa De Don Pedro Inc — $245,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetABODE SERVICES — $245,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNEWARK ARTS COUNCIL — $241,500 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CHILD SUCCESS INC — $238,802 over 2y, 11% of budgetCOMMUNITY VISION CAPITAL & CONSULTING — $232,533 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCENTER FOR EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES INC — $230,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT HOME — $225,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSocial Finance Inc — $213,366 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetGREATER NEWARK ENTERPRISES CORP — $205,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetLeadership Newark Inc — $201,700 over 3y, 26% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NEWARK INC — $201,500 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetInterface Children Family Services — $190,407 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNEWARK PUBLIC RADIO INC — $186,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $180,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NEW YORK CITY INC — $180,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetLINCOLN PARK COAST CULTURAL DISTRICT INC — $165,000 over 3y, 6.6% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF ESSEX COUNTY — $165,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNewark Trust for Education Inc — $163,500 over 3y, 23% of budgetTHE NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC — $160,000 over 2y, 8.1% of budgetHIGHER LEARNING U INC — $150,000 over 2y, 66% of budgetThe Road Called Strate — $150,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetTHE NEWARK MUSEUM ASSOCIATION — $135,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND INC — $130,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCALVERT IMPACT CAPITAL INC — $130,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS — $123,333 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetMetropolitan Alliance of Connected Communities — $123,333 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY LOS ANGELES AUXILIARY SERVICES INC — $122,030 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBUILDING RESPONSIBLE INTELLIGENT CREATIVE KIDS — $120,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $105,665 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $105,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN OF NEW JERSEY — $105,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetBURMESE ROHINGYA ASSOCIATION USA — $100,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetMOYO NGUVU CULTURAL ART CENTER INC — $100,000 over 2y, 41% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ESSEX & WEST HUDSON D/B/A UNITED WAY OF GREATER NEWARK — $65,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetYouthBuild Newark Inc — $65,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetNewark Alliance INC — $65,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetIronbound Community Corporation — $55,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNew Community Corporation — $55,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSOUTH WARD ALLIANCE — $55,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION — $55,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN LUIS VALLEY GREAT OUTDOORS — $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Prudential FoundationNJ57.1× affinity26 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Prudential Foundation · Victoria Foundation Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The McJ Amelior Foundation · Columbia Bank Foundation · Geraldine R Dodge Foundation Inc · Pseg Foundation Inc · Latino Community Foundation of Colorado Inc · Schumann Fund for New Jersey Inc · Turrell Fund · The Denver Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nonprofit Finance Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 20%
  • Ironbound Community Corporation100% of income from government
  • La Casa De Don Pedro Inc58% of income from government
  • South Ward Alliance57% of income from government
  • Newark Public Radio Inc51% of income from government
  • YouthBuild Newark Inc27% of income from government
  • Urban League of Essex County20% of income from government
  • Third Sector Capital Partners Inc16% of income from government
  • Newark Arts Council16% of income from government
  • Social Finance Inc12% of income from government
  • Newark Alliance Inc6% of income from government
  • New Community Corporation4% of income from government
  • United Way of Essex & West Hudson D/B/a United Way of Greater Newark2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
43report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
4rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 139 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph