· Public charity
Noise for Now
To enable performers to connect with and financially support grassroots organizations that work in the field of Reproductive Justice including abortion rights.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 9 grants below total $165,262 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $217,215 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $51,953 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $64k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $68k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Abortion Care Network | $67,888 |
| New York Abortion Access Fund | $32,384 |
| Natl Network Abortion Funds | $21,048 |
| Access Reproductive Justice | $10,289 |
| Louisiana Abortion Fund | $7,610 |
| DC Abortion Fund | $7,060 |
| Access Reproductive Care SE | $6,739 |
| Afiya Center | $6,437 |
| Abortion Liberation Fund of P | $5,807 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACABORTION CARE NETWORK4× · 2022–2025 · $279k · revenue -42%
NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC4× · 2022–2025 · $124k · revenue -41%- NYNEW YORK ABORTION ACCESS FUND3× · 2023–2025 · $58k · revenue -19%
Funded once
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $49k · revenue +26%- FRFAITH ROOTS REPRODUCTIVE ACTIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $27k · revenue +114%
Earth Island Institute Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $27k · revenue +78%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Carolina Abortion Fund supports individuals who have decided to have an abortion by providing financial, logistical, and emotional support.
Health Access Fund works to protect the fundamental right of all people to choose and access quality,dignified and affordable reproductive health care.
The New Jersey Abortion Access Fund advances abortion access and bodily autonomy by funding abortions for people traveling to, from, and within New Jersey.
New river abortion access fund builds power and provides direct financial and practical support to southwest virginians and appalachians seeking abortion care. we dedicated to ensuring that all people have the autonomy and resources to…
To facilitate with women who need help financially to help pay for their abortion, whether abortion is needed for emotional, maternal or fetal health. To help medical facilities who perform abortions open and stay open.
The Reproductive Freedom Fund of New Hampshire removes financial barriers for anyone receiving abortion care in or from New Hampshire through direct service funding and movement building guided by patient need.
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
Planned Parenthood of Montana empowers all people to make informed decisions and ensures the freedom to manage their own sexuality, and personal health by providing the highest quality confidential healthcare services, education, and…
Texas Equal Access Fund provides funding to low-income people in the northern region of Texas who are seeking abortion and cannot afford it, while simultaneously working to end barriers to abortion access through community education and…
Abortion Action Missouri Foundation envisions a world with stigma-free abortion access and reproductive freedom for all.
Abortion Action Missouri envisions a world with stigma-free abortion access and reproductive freedom for all. Our mission is to foster and sustain a Midwest movement for control of our bodies, lives, and futures.
Abortion prevention services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Abortion Care Network and the most unlike its peers is The Afiya Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ABORTION CARE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK ABORTION ACCESS FUND ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds FAITH ROOTS REPRODUCTIVE ACTION ↗
- Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds West Fund ↗
- Who funds ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD KEYSTONE ↗
- Who funds UPPER HUDSON PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds MIDWEST ACCESS COALITION ↗
- Who funds ABORTION LIBERATION FUND OF PA ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA ABORTION FUND ↗
- Who funds DC ABORTION FUND ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds COBALT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE AFIYA CENTER ↗
- Who funds Memphis Center For Reproductive Health Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: National Network of Abortion Funds Inc · Hopewell Fund · Women Donors Network · Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc · New Venture Fund · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc · Impactassetsinc · Groundswell Fund · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Tara Health Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Noise for Now funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Noise for Now?
Find your warmest path to Noise for Now through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.