Skip to content

· Public charity

Noel Cover Foundation Inc C0 Jerry Macken

To provide scholarships.

$9.5M
Granted FY2026still arriving
20
Grants FY2026still arriving
4
States reached
$900k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2026.

Education$5.1MReligion$3.5MHuman Services$1.3MFood & Nutrition$975k
02FY2026 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • $50k–250k8 grants · $692k
  • $250k+12 grants · $8.9M
$360,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MARK'S LUTHERAN CHURCH$900,000
COZAD CAMPING MINISTRY$900,000
COZAD CREATES CARING$900,000
CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH$900,000
CENTRAL COLLEGE DISTRIBUTION$875,000
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER DISTRIBUTION$875,000
HASTING COLLEGE DISTRIBUTION$875,000
ST OLAF COLLEGE DISTRIBUTION$875,000
TRINITY CLASSICAL ACADEMY$735,000
YMCA OF LINCOLN$360,000
COZAD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$350,000
NE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC$310,000
AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH$160,000
AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH$108,500
ST MARK'S LUTHERAN CHURCH$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY26–26, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%COZAD CREATES CARING: $900k → 12%YMCA OF LINCOLN: $360k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

12%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 4 repeat orgs$9.5M to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2026, 4 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
16

Total granted

$1.3M
$9.5M

Still filing today

0%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HASTING COLLEGE DISTRIBUTION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $325k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVER DISTRIBUTION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $325k
  • CC
    CENTRAL COLLEGE DISTRIBUTION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $325k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF DENVERgraduated
    one grant, 2026 · $943k · revenue +33%
  • HC
    HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2026 · $943k · revenue ×31
  • CC
    CENTRAL COLLEGE
    one grant, 2026 · $943k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Luther College

Founded by the norwegian evangelical lutheran church in 1861, luther college is a four-year, residential liberal arts institution. luther welcomes students of all backgrounds to engage in a way of learning that moves beyond immediate…

Education
2
Omaha Christian Academy

K-8 school

—
3
Providence Christian College

The mission of providence christian college is to equip students to be firmly grounded in biblical truth, thoroughly educated in the liberal arts, and fully engaged in their church, community, and the world, for the glory of god and for…

Education
4
Community Christian School of Weste Rn Nebraska Inc

Encourage students to learn and apply god's truth while promoting academic excellence in a christian environment.

Education
5
Central Christian College of Kansas

Central christian college of kansas is a four-year, non-profit liberal arts college with the primary mission of offering a christ-centered education for character.

Education
6
Midwest University

Christian institution of higher learning dedicated to the exploration, discernment, sustentation, and dissemination of god's truth. midwest is committed to excellence in education encouraging students to comprehensively consider god's word…

Education
7
The Christian Academy

The christian academy provides christian education to 300 students from kindergarten to 12th grade. the christian academy is a college-preparatory school.

—
8
Christendom Educational Corporation

Provide a catholic liberal arts education at the undergraduate and graduate levels.

Education
9
Crowley's Ridge College

The college is a four year coeducational liberal arts college affiliated with the churches of christ

Education
10
North Central University

North central university is a christian university with a commitment to academic excellence.

Education
11
Columbia Christian Schools

Columbia christian schools seeks to provide a christ-centered education focused on excellence in faith, character and academics to students in preschool through 12th grade.

—
12
Lincoln Christian School Association

The mission of lincoln christian school is to teach the truth by studying god's world in light of god's word, presenting the gospel of jesus christ, providing mental growth through sound basic academic disciplines, stimulating spiritual…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trinity Classical Academy; the most unlike its peers is Cozad Camping Ministry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $943,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVERHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $943,250 · EducationHASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATIONCENTRAL COLLEGE: $943,250 · EducationCENTRAL COLLEGEST OLAF COLLEGE: $943,250 · EducationST OLAF COLLEGETRINITY CLASSICAL ACADEMY: $735,000 · EducationTRINITY CLASSICAL ACADEMYNEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $310,000 · EducationNEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INCST MARKS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $900,000 · OtherST MARKS LUTHERAN CHURCHCHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH: $900,000 · OtherCHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCHCOZAD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $350,000 · OtherCOZAD UNITED METHODIST CHURCHHASTING COLLEGE DISTRIBUTION: $325,000 · OtherHASTING COLLEGE DISTRIBUTIONUNIVERSITY OF DENVER DISTRIBUTION: $325,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF DENVER DISTRIBUTIONCENTRAL COLLEGE DISTRIBUTION: $325,000 · OtherCENTRAL COLLEGE DISTRIBUTIONST OLAF COLLEGE DISTRIBUTION: $325,000 · OtherST OLAF COLLEGE DISTRIBUTIONAMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $160,000 · Other+3 more: $258,500 · Other+3 moreCozad Creates Caring: $900,000 · Human ServicesCozad Creates…YMCA OF LINCOLN: $360,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF LINCO…COZAD CAMPING MINISTRY: $900,000 · ReligionCOZAD CAM…
Education$4,818,000Other$3,868,500Human Services$1,260,000Religion$900,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ST OLAF COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COZAD CAMPING MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds Cozad Creates Caring ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY CLASSICAL ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF LINCOLN ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Noel Cover Foundation Inc C0 Jerry Macken funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Noel Cover Foundation Inc C0 Jerry Macken. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Noel Cover Foundation Inc C0 Jerry Macken?

    Find your warmest path to Noel Cover Foundation Inc C0 Jerry Macken through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Noel Cover Foundation Inc C0 Jerry Macken’s filings →

    More from the funding graph