Skip to content

· Public charity

Noah's Hope - Hope 4 Bridget Foundation

To raise funds for the purpose of driving and supporting research and trials toward the ultimate goal of irradicating batten disease.

$235k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$130k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.7M
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $180k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$113k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANFORD RESEARCH$130,000
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE$50,000
RUSH UNIVERSITY$25,000
BATTEN DISEASE SUPPORT AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATION$20,314
OUR PROMISE TO NICHOLAS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE: $100k → 28%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $62k → 21%OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY (MCBRIDE RESEARCH): $15k → 12%CARE BEYOND DIAGNOSIS: $30k → 10%BATTEN DISEASE SUPPORT AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $147k → 15%RUSH UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%SANFORD RESEARCH: $173k → 9%OUR PROMISE TO NICHOLAS: $10k → 7%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $62k → 21%BATTEN DISEASE SUPPORT AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $94k → 15%RUSH UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%SANFORD RESEARCH: $150k → 9%OUR PROMISE TO NICHOLAS: $10k → 7%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $50k → 21%BATTEN DISEASE SUPPORT AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $92k → 15%RUSH UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%SANFORD RESEARCH: $130k → 9%OUR PROMISE TO NICHOLAS FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $50k → 21%BATTEN DISEASE SUPPORT AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $86k → 15%RUSH UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%SANFORD RESEARCH: $44k → 9%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $47k → 21%BATTEN DISEASE SUPPORT AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $56k → 15%RUSH UNIVERSITY: $25k → 14%WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE: $46k → 21%BATTEN DISEASE SUPPORT AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $37k → 15%IMD GUEST HOUSE FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $22k → 21%BATTEN DISEASE SUPPORT AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $27k → 15%BATTEN DISEASE SUPPORT AND RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
OR
SD
OH
MO
TN
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 5 repeat orgs$181k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
6

Total granted

$1.5M
$181k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+79%

Still filing today

80%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2018–2024 · $317k · revenue +76%
  • RU
    Rush University Medical Center
    5× · 2020–2024 · $125k · revenue +30%
  • OP
    OUR PROMISE TO NICHOLAS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2024 · $30k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • AE
    Albert Einstein College of Medicinegraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +270%
  • CB
    CARE BEYOND DIAGNOSIS
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • SL
    ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $22k · revenue +7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
A T Still University of Health Sciences

A.T. Still University of Health Sciences serves as a learning-centered university dedicated to preparing highly competent professionals through innovative academic programs. The University is committed to continuing its osteopathic…

Education
5
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
6
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
9
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
10
New York Society for the Relief of the Ruptured and Crippled Maintaining the

The mission of hospital for special surgery is to provide the highest quality patient care, improve mobility, and enhance the quality of life for all and to advance the science of orthopedic surgery, rheumatology, and their related…

Health
11
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
12
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis University; the most unlike its peers is Imd Guest House Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BATTEN DISEASE SUPPORT & RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $558,883 · HealthBATTEN DISEASE SUPPORT & RESEARCH ASSOCIATIONRush University Medical Center: $125,000 · HealthRush University Medical CenterOUR PROMISE TO NICHOLAS FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Health+1 more: $5,000 · HealthSANFORD: $496,961 · OtherSANFORDCARE BEYOND DIAGNOSIS: $30,000 · OtherCARE BEYOND DIAGNOSIS+1 more: $9,852 · OtherWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $316,559 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYAlbert Einstein College of Medicine: $100,000 · EducationAlbert Einstein College of Med…ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $21,587 · Education+1 more: $15,000 · Education
Health$718,883Other$536,813Education$453,146

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBATTEN DISEASE SUPPORT & RESEARCH ASSOCIATION: $558,883 over 8y, 18% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $316,559 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRush University Medical Center: $125,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR PROMISE TO NICHOLAS FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $21,587 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIMD Guest House Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Noah's Hope - Hope 4 Bridget Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Noah's Hope - Hope 4 Bridget Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Oregon Health & Science University Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Noah's Hope - Hope 4 Bridget’s filings →

More from the funding graph