Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nindra Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

78% of Nindra Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 7 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Nindra Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $40k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’17
12
’18
13
’19
13
’20
9
’21
13
’22
14
’23
11
’24
7
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$128kHealth$72kInternational$65kEducation$23kArts & Culture$16kHuman Services$14kReligion$12kCivil Rights$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$1,100
Median grant
6
States reached
$702k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters$25,250
Swaminarayan Welfare Inc$5,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$1,250
Shriner's Hospital for Children$1,250
ForKids$1,250
The Union Mission Ministries$1,250
The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society$1,100
Tiny Smiling Faces$1,000
Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation$1,000
Tunnel to Towers Foundation$500
The Salvation Army$500
Foodbank of Southeastern Virginia & the Eastern Sh$250
Roc Solid Foundation Inc$250
Judeo-Christian Outreach Center$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Camp Kesem National: $1k → 14%Tiny Smiling Faces: $1k → 15%Charutar Health Foundation Corp: $1k → 8%An Achievable Dream Inc: $1k → 17%Camp Kesem National: $1k → 14%An Achievable Dream Inc: $1k → 17%An Achievable Dream Inc: $1k → 17%An Achievable Dream Inc: $500 → 17%An Achievable Dream Inc: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
NV
IN
PA
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 37% of Nindra Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Nindra Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$153k · 28 repeat orgs$61k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

28 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
15

Total granted

$153k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+6%

Still filing today

61%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsEducationHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AO
    AAPI of Hampton Roads Inc
    3× · 2018–2023 · $13k · revenue +43% · 63% of their budget
  • SW
    SWAMINARAYAN WELFARE INC
    3× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +112%
  • PF
    Physicians For Peace
    5× · 2019–2023 · $7k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • IH
    India Heritage Foundation
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • UF
    United Fund of Puerto Rico
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • MF
    Make-a-Wish Foundation of Greater V
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
2
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
3
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
4
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
5
National Foundation for Cancer Research

To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.

Health
6
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
7
Seattle Biomedical Research Institute

We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…

—
8
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
9
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
10
The V Foundation

We fund game-changing research and all-star scientists to accelerate victory over cancer and save lives.

Health
11
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
12
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Houston Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Townebank Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/37
Grantees still filing
22/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $122,500 · PhilanthropyRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc+3 more: $6,250 · PhilanthropyBHARAT INC: $56,700 · OtherBHARAT INCIndia Heritage Foundation: $10,000 · OtherIndia Heritage FoundationEASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOL: $7,000 · OtherEASTERN VIRGINIA MEDICAL SCHOOLPushti Margiya Vaishnav Samaj of No: $6,500 · OtherPushti Margiya Vaishnav Samaj of No+29 more: $38,350 · Other+29 moreChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters: $25,250 · HealthChildren's Hospital …AAPI of Hampton Roads Inc: $13,350 · HealthAAPI of Hampton Road…VITILIGO SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,500 · HealthVITILIGO SUPPORT INT…TOWNEBANK FOUNDATION: $4,500 · HealthTOWNEBANK FOUNDATIONWESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC INC: $3,250 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,750 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,100 · Health+4 more: $4,250 · Health+4 moreSWAMINARAYAN WELFARE INC: $9,000 · ReligionAN ACHIEVABLE DREAM INC: $4,250 · Human ServicesCamp Kesem National: $2,000 · Human ServicesCHARUTAR HEALTH FOUNDATION CORP: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE DALUBHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL FUND INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesPhysicians For Peace: $6,500 · InternationalHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 · InternationalACLU FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $2,250 · Civil RightsASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC: $1,750 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 · Civil Rights
Philanthropy$128,750Other$118,550Health$61,950Religion$9,000Human Services$8,250International$7,500Civil Rights$5,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $122,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital of the King's Daughters: $25,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAAPI of Hampton Roads Inc: $13,350 over 3y, 63% of budgetSWAMINARAYAN WELFARE INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetPhysicians For Peace: $6,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetVITILIGO SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL INC: $6,500 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetTOWNEBANK FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAN ACHIEVABLE DREAM INC: $4,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC INC: $3,250 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $2,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACLU FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA: $2,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC: $1,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNPR FOUNDATION: $1,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFORKIDS INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARUTAR HEALTH FOUNDATION CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DALUBHAI GOPALBHAI PATEL FUND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL BRIGADES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE CARE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHESAPEAKE GENERAL HOSPITAL HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROC SOLID FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOODBANK OF SOUTHEASTERN VIRGINIA: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOZILLA FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDEO-CHRISTIAN OUTREACH CENTERINC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital of the King's Daughters ↗
  • Who funds AAPI of Hampton Roads Inc ↗
  • Who funds SWAMINARAYAN WELFARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Physicians For Peace ↗
  • Who funds VITILIGO SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds TOWNEBANK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds AN ACHIEVABLE DREAM INC ↗
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN TIDEWATER FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ACLU FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
  • Who funds PULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NPR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Vitiligo Research Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FORKIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARUTAR HEALTH FOUNDATION CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Beazley Foundation IncorporatedVA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Beazley Foundation Incorporated · Hampton Roads Community Foundation · Sentara Health · United Way of South Hampton Roads · Suffolk Foundation · Townebank Foundation · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Shell USA Company Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nindra Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nindra Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nindra Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Nindra Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nindra’s filings →

    More from the funding graph