Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nihla & Bob Lapidus Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$85k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$217kEducation$81kReligion$68kHuman Services$18kCivil Rights$14kFood & Nutrition$12kArts & Culture$7kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$8,831
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL$20,070
MIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE$10,035
ST JUDE$9,991
CONGREGATION ADATH ISRAEL$9,986
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$8,831
RUSHFORD CENTER$7,994
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION - CT$6,632
YMCA$5,964
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PINE STREET INN: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$393k · 12 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +78% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
14

Total granted

$393k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+7%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthCivil RightsPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $142k · revenue +35%
  • RC
    Rushford Center Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +67%
  • MC
    MIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $51k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • MC
    MANCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • OP
    ODDFELLOWS PLAYHOUSEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +72%
  • EF
    EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +1%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network Inc

The mission of Dana-Farber Cancer Care Network (DFCCN) is to promote and support, directly or indirectly, the interests and purposes of Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI).

Health
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
7
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
8
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
9
Neighborhealth Corporation

Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…

Health
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Arc Research Institute

Our mission is to accelerate scientific progress, understand the root causes of disease, and narrow the gap between discoveries and impact on patients.

Health
12
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Middlesex Hospital; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
12/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL: $141,560 · HealthMIDDLESEX HOSPITALRushford Center Inc: $58,962 · HealthRushford Center IncDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $7,500 · Health+2 more: $7,008 · HealthCONGREGATION ADATH ISRAEL: $50,193 · OtherCONGREGATION ADATH ISRAELMIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $20,007 · OtherMIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGEST JUDE: $17,976 · OtherST JUDEYMCA: $17,895 · OtherYMCAAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION - CT: $10,633 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION - CTGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $10,612 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCMANCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $9,850 · OtherMANCHESTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE+8 more: $7,908 · Other+8 moreMIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $51,041 · PhilanthropyMIDDLESEX COM…ODDFELLOWS PLAYHOUSE: $7,200 · Arts & CulturePINE STREET INN INC: $1,897 · Human ServicesEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $991 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $524 · Civil RightsTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $529 · InternationalFRIENDS OF BROOKLINE ROWING INC: $100 · Recreation & Sports
Health$215,030Other$145,074Philanthropy$51,041Arts & Culture$7,200Human Services$1,897Civil Rights$1,515International$529Recreation & Sports$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIDDLESEX HOSPITAL: $141,560 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRushford Center Inc: $58,962 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $51,041 over 6y, 4.8% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $10,612 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetODDFELLOWS PLAYHOUSE: $7,200 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,008 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $1,897 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $991 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $618 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC: $529 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $524 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BROOKLINE ROWING INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDDLESEX HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Rushford Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds ODDFELLOWS PLAYHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE UNION OF CONCERNED SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BROOKLINE ROWING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Liberty Bank Foundation IncCT13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nihla & Bob Lapidus Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nihla & Bob Lapidus Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Rushford Center Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Epilepsy Foundation of America: 22% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Middlesex Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Nihla & Bob Lapidus Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Nihla & Bob Lapidus Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nihla & Bob Lapidus’ filings →

More from the funding graph