Skip to content

· Private foundation

Niebrugge Cares Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$65kHuman Services$64kPhilanthropy$48kEducation$32kPublic Benefit$25kEnvironment$14kCrime & Legal$10kAnimals$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$711k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GARY SINISE FOUNDATION$10,000
ST MARY OF THE LAKE$5,000
ST ANTHONY GRADE SCHOOL$5,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CEFS$5,000
BALLARD NATURE CENTER$3,000
SACRED HEART SCHOOL$3,000
EFFINGHAM HUMANE SOCIETY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Swan: $5k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$192k · 11 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$192k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+25%

Still filing today

27%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyPublic BenefitEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SACRED HEART CHURCH
    3× · 2019–2021 · $30k
  • C
    CEFS
    3× · 2018–2025 · $28k
  • SH
    SACRED HEART SCHOOL
    6× · 2017–2025 · $27k

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF EFFINGHAM CNTY INC
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -31%
  • CN
    CRISIS NURSERY OF EFFINGHAM COUNTYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +116%
  • EC
    EFFINGHAM COMMUNITY ON AGING
    one grant, 2018 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Effingham Animal Rescue Sanctuary

None

Animals
2
Citrus County Abuse Shelter Associa

Rape crisis and abuse shelter

—
3
Ruff Haven

The three-fold mission of Ruff Haven Crisis Sheltering is to provide a temporary safe haven for companion animals to keep pets and their people together in times of crisis; increase pet retention, and decrease the number of animals…

Animals
4
Refuge for Women Emerg Housing Llc

The organization provides emergency temporary shelter for women attempting to escape sexual exploitation.

Human Services
5
Casa Glynn Inc

Casa glynn provides trained and supervised volunteers to advocate for the rights and needs of victims of child abuse and neglect.

Civil Rights
6
Southern Mn Crisis Nursery Dba Ivy House

To provide a temporary, safe and loving home for children of families in stressful situations, to support and strengthen families and to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Human Services
7
Crisis Nursery of the Ozarks Inc

Provide immediate refuge for children ages birth to 12 whose families are experiencing an unexpected, unstable, or serious condition or crisis.

Crime & Legal
8
Baby Gunns Animal Rescue
Animals
9
Crisis Center for Domestic Abuse and Sexual Assault

The crisis center is committed to the prevention and elimination of domestic violence and sexual assault. we work to enhance safety and to promote equality in relationships.

—
10
The Glynn Community Crisis Center Inc

Providing emergency shelter and other services to persons battered and or abused, commonly referred to as domestic violence.

—
11
Crisis Intervention Shelter Service

Assistance to victims of violence.provide women & children salfe shelter, support groups, advocacy, referrals, financial assistance, hotline.

Human Services
12
Fluvanna County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To rescue domestic animals from cruelty, neglect, and abandonment and place

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Effingham Cnty Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ballard Family Nature Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SACRED HEART CHURCH: $30,000 · OtherSACRED HEART CHURCHCEFS: $27,500 · OtherCEFSSACRED HEART SCHOOL: $26,500 · OtherSACRED HEART SCHOOLMAKE A WISH FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherMAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONSt Anthony Church: $15,000 · OtherSt Anthony ChurchSt Mary of the Lake Church: $15,000 · OtherSt Mary of the Lake ChurchIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEFFINGHAM COMMUNITY ON AGING: $7,500 · Other+13 more: $54,500 · Other+13 moreUNITED WAY OF EFFINGHAM CNTY INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …GARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE…THIS ABLE VETERAN: $24,500 · Public BenefitTHIS ABLE…CRISIS NURSERY OF EFFINGHAM COUNTY: $10,000 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global: $5,000 · HealthBALLARD FAMILY NATURE CENTER INC: $14,000 · EnvironmentStopping Woman Abuse Now (SWAN): $5,000 · Human Services
Other$208,500Philanthropy$30,000Public Benefit$24,500Health$15,000Environment$14,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHIS ABLE VETERAN: $24,500 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EFFINGHAM CNTY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBALLARD FAMILY NATURE CENTER INC: $14,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY OF EFFINGHAM COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetStopping Woman Abuse Now (SWAN): $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCASA of Effingham County: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEFFINGHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THIS ABLE VETERAN ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF EFFINGHAM CNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds BALLARD FAMILY NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS NURSERY OF EFFINGHAM COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds Stopping Woman Abuse Now (SWAN) ↗
  • Who funds CASA of Effingham County ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
  • Who funds EFFINGHAM COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Southeastern Illinois Community FoundationIL15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Southeastern Illinois Community Foundation · Virginia C Koboldt Charitable Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Niebrugge Cares Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Niebrugge Cares Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Niebrugge Cares’ filings →

    More from the funding graph