Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nibbe Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$265k
Granted FY2024still arriving
50
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$55k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Education$290kArts & Culture$84kFood & Nutrition$29kHealth$23kRecreation & Sports$17kPublic Safety & Disaster$14kYouth Development$14kAnimals$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k46 grants · $150k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $55k
$3,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Minnesota State Univ Moorhead$55,000
Univ of Minnesota Foundation$25,000
Lac Qui Parle Valley High School$20,000
Guthrie Theater$15,000
Individual grant recipient$7,900
United Way DouglasPope Cty$6,500
Individual grant recipient$6,300
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Samburu$5,000
Zumbrota Mazeppa High School$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Luverne Elementary School$5,000
LQP Historical Museum$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Pine Island Sharing Shelves: $2k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$367k · 22 repeat orgs$152k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
11

Total granted

$367k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+64%

Still filing today

27%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 58% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $111k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsArts & CultureInternationalCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GT
    GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $63k · revenue +101%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $55k · revenue +37%
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • MH
    Madison Healthcare
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SC
    St Charles High School
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • HH
    Houston High School
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
2
Animal Humane Society

Animal Humane Society (AHS) established in 1878 and incorporated as a nonprofit charitable organization in 1891 works to engage the hearts, hands, and minds of the community to help animals. AHS's vision is to compassionately and…

Animals
3
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
4
Tri-County Humane Society

We believe in the human-animal bond and exist to support the animals and people of central minnesota by practicing and promoting quality animal care, offering compassionate customer service, and providing humane education.

Animals
5
Minnesota State University Student Association Inc

Led by minnesota state university students, we are the inclusive voice for all future, current, and former students. we actively work to represent and support minnesota state university students and advocate at a campus, state, and federal…

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

The primary mission of the humane society is to end animal cruelty, neglect and overpopulation in south carolina.

Animals
8
Mitchell Hamline School of Law

Mitchell hamline school of law is an independent law school that advances its mission through a combination of legal education, public service, and community engagement. it is dedicated to preparing students to practice law, while also…

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
11
The Open Door

The open door is a leading hunger-relief organization serving dakota county, minnesota, where food insecurity is a growing challenge. the open door is dedicated to ending local hunger by providing access to healthy, fresh, and nutritious…

Food & Nutrition
12
Lawrence Humane Society

The lawrence humane society nurtures the human-animal bond by providing shelter, care and advocacy for homeless and abused animals, as well as resource for the pets and people in our community

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pine Island Sharing Shelves. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 65 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Minnesota State Univ Moorhead: $102,700 · OtherMinnesota State Univ MoorheadLac Qui Parle Valley High School: $32,000 · OtherLac Qui Parle Valley High SchoolZumbrota Mazeppa High School: $18,020 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $13,900 · Other+51 more: $201,300 · Other+51 moreUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $7,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION: $62,500 · Arts & CultureGUTHRIE THEAT…TREVOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsHOMEWARD ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $3,000 · AnimalsPAWS AND CLAWS INC DBA PAWS AND CLAWS HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,000 · AnimalsMARSHMALLOW ANIMAL SHELTER: $3,000 · AnimalsOutreach Foodshelf: $3,000 · Food & NutritionHOPE COALITION: $3,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$367,920Education$63,500Arts & Culture$62,500Civil Rights$10,000Animals$9,000Food & Nutrition$3,000Housing & Shelter$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION: $62,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOutreach Foodshelf: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEWARD ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE COALITION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPAWS AND CLAWS INC DBA PAWS AND CLAWS HUMANE SOCIETY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMARSHMALLOW ANIMAL SHELTER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPINE ISLAND SHARING SHELVES: $2,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GUTHRIE THEATER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nibbe Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nibbe Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nibbe Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph