How much did NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CARE grant in FY2025?

Human Services$903kHealth$805kArts & Culture$248kCrime & Legal$172kAnimals$135kFood & Nutrition$90kHousing & Shelter$90kInternational$76kRecreation & Sports$45kOther$713k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

skilled nursingnursing facilitycrisis

2020

emergency

2021

covid emergency

2022

justice systemplanning processcovid emergencysmallsocialincarcerationbuild

2023

youthtenantsgoddard riversidealvin aileyhortbenefitshorticultural

2024

promotingpersonswomenhortinclusionunderservedeconomic justice

2025

outreachartistsoye grouparts educationensurepermanent lovingloving nurturing

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k1 grant · $9k
$10k–50k25 grants · $424k
$50k–250k2 grants · $113k

$18,000

Median grant

States reached

$8.9M

Total assets

Largest grants

MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER$63,000
THE BLUE CARD$50,000
PROJECT GUARDIANSHIP$25,465
HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER$25,000
THE HEBREW HOME FOR THE AGED$20,400
YWCA OF BROOKLYN$20,000
SVC PROGRAM FOR OLDER PEOPLE$20,000
INSTI FOR COMM EQUITY & SHA$20,000
HEIGHTS AND HILLS$20,000
ARIVA$20,000
KINGS BAY YM-YWHA$20,000
NY COUNCIL ON ADOPTABLE CHILD$20,000
EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE$20,000
CIAD$18,000
EARLY ALZHEIMERS FNDN$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $903k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.8M · 31 repeat orgs$430k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.8M

$313k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%

+18%

Still filing today

100%

56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalInternationalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MM
MONTRFIORE MEDICAL CENTER
7× · 2019–2025 · $342k · revenue +59%
CI
CONCERTS IN MOTION
7× · 2019–2025 · $178k · revenue +123%
TG
THE GUARDIANSHIP PROGREM
7× · 2019–2025 · $157k · revenue +92%

Funded once

MT
MARGARET TIETZ NURSING & REHAB CENT
one grant, 2019 · $53k · revenue -100%
FH
FAMILY HEALTH CENTER AT NYU LANGONE
one grant, 2020 · $30k
TC
THE CARTER BURDEN CENTER
one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue -7%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Jewish Home of Central New York Senior

To assure maximum independence and dignity for residents, with a broad range of health, residential, and community services

Housing & Shelter

Leadingage New York Inc

Leadingage new york represents not-for-profit, mission-driven and public continuing care providers, including nursing homes, senior housing, adult care facilities, continuing care retirement communities, assisted living and community…

Civil Rights

Jewish Home of Central New York

Jewish home of central new york residential living's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home is committed to maintaining…

Human Services

Metropolitan Jewish Home Care Inc

To provide certified home care and care management services.

Health

The Way Back Inc

To provide rehabilitative housing services and support to help people with psychiatric disabilities reintegrate into the community.

Human Services

Encore Community Services

To provide programs and assistance to needy senior citizens.

Human Services

Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

To support the delivery of health care services to patients in the new york metropolitan area.

Health

Jewish Home Lifecare Community Services

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

International

The Hebrew Home for the Aged at Riverdale Foundation Inc

To provide assistance to programs for older adults in the new york area.

Crime & Legal

Menorah Home and Hospital for Aged and Infirm

A 420 bed skilled nursing and rehabilitation facility

Health

Hebrew Health Care Inc

Provision of exceptional health care & aging services tailored to each individual.

Health

Network of Jewish Human Service

Advances efforts in best practices, innovation, research and partnerships to strengthen non-profit jewish human service agencies so they can better serve their communities.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University Settlement Society of New and the most unlike its peers is Citymeals-On-Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/52

the rest of the field

3,372/36,026

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

49/50

Grantees still filing

40/50

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$902,900Health$804,900Other$923,255Arts & Culture$247,600Crime & Legal$172,465Animals$135,000Food & Nutrition$90,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robin Hood FoundationNY33.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Isaac H Tuttle Fund · The Jean & Louis Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Florence V Burden Foundation · Marty and Dorothy Silverman Foundation · The Barker Welfare Foundation · The New York and Presbyterian Hospital

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CARE funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EARLY ALZHEIMERS FNDN.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~28 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 201041087 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on EARLY ALZHEIMERS FNDN, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 28 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 9% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to New York Foundation for Elder Care?

Find your warmest path to New York Foundation for Elder Care through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CARE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to New York Foundation for Elder Care?

More from the funding graph

NEW YORK FOUNDATION FOR ELDER CARE

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

50 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to New York Foundation for Elder Care?

More from the funding graph