Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

New York Foundation for Elder Care

To raise funds to develop and carry on programs that benefit the elderly and disabled in both an institutional setting and a community based setting.

$547k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.

Health$937kHuman Services$842kPublic Safety & Disaster$341kArts & Culture$248kCrime & Legal$207kFood & Nutrition$169kHousing & Shelter$140kAnimals$135kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $424k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $113k
$18,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER$63,000
THE BLUE CARD$50,000
PROJECT GUARDIANSHIP$25,465
HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER$25,000
THE HEBREW HOME FOR THE AGED$20,400
YWCA OF BROOKLYN$20,000
INSTI FOR COMM EQUITY & SHA$20,000
SVC PROGRAM FOR OLDER PEOPLE$20,000
KINGS BAY YM-YWHA$20,000
EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE$20,000
HEIGHTS AND HILLS$20,000
NY COUNCIL ON ADOPTABLE CHILD$20,000
ARIVA$20,000
CIAD$18,000
EARLY ALZHEIMERS FNDN$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $903k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%THE BLUE CARD: $61k → 17%ARIVA: $20k → 28%THE BLUE CARD: $60k → 17%ARIVA: $20k → 28%THE BLUE CARD: $55k → 17%THE BLUE CARD: $55k → 17%THE BLUE CARD: $50k → 17%THE BLUE CARD: $50k → 17%THE BLUE CARD: $50k → 17%LIFE STORY CLUB: $20k → 20%NY COUNCIL ON ADOPTABLE CHILD: $20k → 17%LIFE STORY CLUB: $20k → 20%LIFE STORY CLUB: $10k → 20%MOVING FOR LIFE: $10k → 17%HEIGHTS & HILLS: $20k → 20%HEIGHTS AND HILLS: $20k → 20%HEIGHTS & HILLS: $20k → 20%HEIGHTS AND HILLS: $20k → 20%HEIGHTS & HILLS: $20k → 20%HEIGHTS AND HILLS: $20k → 20%HUDSON GUILD: $20k → 17%HEIGHTS & HILLS: $16k → 20%LIFEFORCE IN LATTER YEARS(LILY): $19k → 17%LIFEFORCE IN LATTER YEARS(LILY): $15k → 17%LIFEFORCE IN LATTER YEARS (LILY): $10k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $15k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE: $15k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $27k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER: $25k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER: $25k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $20k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $20k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER: $20k → 17%SVC PROGRAM FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $20k → 17%SVC PROGRAM FOR OLDER PEOPLE: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 31 repeat orgs$432k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

31 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
17

Total granted

$2.9M
$315k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+22%

Still filing today

100%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $117k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureCrime & LegalInternationalHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER
    7× · 2019–2025 · $342k · revenue +41%
  • VN
    VISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK
    5× · 2019–2023 · $240k · revenue +35%
  • CI
    CONCERTS IN MOTION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $178k · revenue +86%

Funded once

  • MT
    MARGARET TIETZ NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $65k · revenue -100%
  • FH
    FAMILY HEALTH CENTER AT NYU LANGONE
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
  • YU
    YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Home Lifecare Manhattan

Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.

Health
2
Nysarc Inc New York City Chapter

We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.

Human Services
3
Visiting Nurse Service of New York Home Care Ii

Vns health home care is part of one of the nation's largest nonprofit home and community-based health care organizations. we help people live, age, and heal where they feel most comfortable. please refer to schedule o for additional…

Health
4
Pibly Residential Programs Inc

Pibly's mission embraces the belief that the needs of its consumers can be met and their goals can be achieved. pibly strives to expand opportunities for people living with mental health challenges by delivering person centered services…

—
5
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc

Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…

—
6
Jewish Board of Family & Children's Services Inc

To empower new yorkers, providing integrated mental health and social services with compassion and expertise.

Human Services
7
The New York Gracie Square Hospital Inc

Our mission is to provide the highest-quality, state-of-the-art mental health and chemical dependency treatment in a warm, healing environment. our caring, compassionate team prepares our patients to return to their families and…

Health
8
Argus Community Inc

Argus community's mission is to provide innovative programs which help severely disadvantaged teens and adults to free themselves from poverty and drug abuse and build new lives based on responsibility, work, and hope. argus provides a…

Health
9
Housing Options and Geriatric Association Resources Inc

To assist societys most disenfranchised; the elderly, seriously mentally ill adults, the homeless, people living with AIDS and the physically challenged by promoting, fostering and providing the highest quality of housing and services in a…

Health
10
Hamilton-Madison House Inc

Hamilton-madison house is a non-profit settlement house that has been the place for care and connection for the diverse populations of the lower east side since 1898. based in the lower east side but offering programming citywide, we…

Arts & Culture
11
Jewish Home Lifecare

Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.

—
12
Parker Jewish Institute for Health Care and Rehabilitation

To provide with compassion and dedication superior quality health care and rehabilitation for adults and to directly or indirectly coordinate arrangements and provision for comprehensive health care and social support services to frail…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Renewal Inc and the most unlike its peers is Yeshiva University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr15%10%5–10yr21%16%10–20yr22%16%20–35yr14%18%35–55yr9%41%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr21%15%10–20yr22%18%20–35yr14%19%35–55yr9%45%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/52
the rest of the field
11%
3,927/36,026

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
32/50
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE BLUE CARD INC — $381,000 · Human ServicesTHE BLUE CARD INCHEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC — $137,100 · Human ServicesHEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOP…HEIGHTS & HILLS INC — $136,000 · Human ServicesHEIGHTS & HILLS INCLIFE STORY CLUB — $50,000 · Human ServicesLIFE STORY CLUBLifeforce in Later Years Inc — $43,800 · Human ServicesARIVA INC — $40,000 · Human ServicesSERVICE PROGRAM FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC — $35,000 · Human Services+4 more — $80,000 · Human Services+4 moreMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $342,000 · HealthMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTERVISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK — $240,000 · HealthVISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NE…MARGARET TIETZ NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER — $65,000 · HealthMARGARET TIETZ NURSING AND R…AMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC — $45,000 · HealthAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE A…The Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale — $35,400 · HealthSUNSET PARK HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $35,000 · HealthEARLY ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 · Health+2 more — $25,000 · HealthKINGS BAY YM-YWHA INC — $156,500 · OtherKINGS BAY YM-YWHA INCGREENWICH HOUSE INC — $104,000 · OtherGREENWICH HOUSE INCTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC — $40,000 · OtherTHE YWCA OF BROOKLYN INC — $40,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES INC — $35,000 · OtherEND OF LIFE CHOICES NEW YORK INC — $35,000 · OtherCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $90,000 · OtherCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELSWomen for Afghan Women Inc — $65,755 · OtherWomen for Afghan Women IncCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 · OtherONE COMMUNITY NYC INC — $40,000 · OtherTHE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $35,000 · Other+15 more — $227,000 · Other+15 moreCONCERTS IN MOTION INC — $177,600 · Arts & CultureMASTERVOICES INC — $20,000 · Arts & CultureALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureDANCES FOR A VARIABLE POPULATION INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureAnderson&Bert Cade Fulton Foundation — $10,000 · Arts & CultureOYE GROUP INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC — $157,465 · Crime & LegalJUSTICE INNOVATION INC — $15,000 · Crime & LegalPets are Wonderful Support Inc dba PAWS — $135,000 · AnimalsPRATT AREA COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC — $55,000 · Housing & ShelterNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF BROOKLYN CDC INC — $45,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$902,900Health$817,400Other$913,255Arts & Culture$247,600Crime & Legal$172,465Animals$135,000Housing & Shelter$100,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE BLUE CARD INC — $381,000 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER — $342,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK — $240,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCONCERTS IN MOTION INC — $177,600 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC — $157,465 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetKINGS BAY YM-YWHA INC — $156,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC — $137,100 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetHEIGHTS & HILLS INC — $136,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetPets are Wonderful Support Inc dba PAWS — $135,000 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetGREENWICH HOUSE INC — $104,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $90,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWomen for Afghan Women Inc — $65,755 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMARGARET TIETZ NURSING AND REHABILITATION CENTER — $65,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPRATT AREA COMMUNITY COUNCIL INC — $55,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetLIFE STORY CLUB — $50,000 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetAMERICAN PARKINSON DISEASE ASSOC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD HOUSING SERVICES OF BROOKLYN CDC INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCITY PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLifeforce in Later Years Inc — $43,800 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARIVA INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE YWCA OF BROOKLYN INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetONE COMMUNITY NYC INC — $40,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetThe Hebrew Home for Aged at Riverdale — $35,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY MEDIATION SERVICES INC — $35,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEND OF LIFE CHOICES NEW YORK INC — $35,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetSERVICE PROGRAM FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSUNSET PARK HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEARLY ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetSEARCH AND CARE INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARTER BURDEN NETWORK INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGODDARD RIVERSIDE COMMUNITY CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMASTERVOICES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNEW YORK COUNCIL ON ADOPTABLE CHILDREN INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHUDSON GUILDINC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUSTICE INNOVATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT RENEWAL INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOVING FOR LIFE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetBROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMUNILIFE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCARMEL RICHMOND NURSING HOME INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOYE GROUP INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Fan Fox and Lesli…Robin Hood FoundationThe New York Communit…The Hyde and Watson F…Isaac H Tuttle FundThe Jean & Louis Drey…Brooklyn Community Fo…Mother Cabrini Health…Van Ameringen Foundat…Jewish Communal FundThe New York and Pres…Lily Auchincloss Foun…
The Fan Fox and Leslie R Samuels Foundation IncNY42.5× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Fan Fox and Leslie R Samuels Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Isaac H Tuttle Fund · The Jean & Louis Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Van Ameringen Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The New York and Presbyterian Hospital · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization New York Foundation for Elder Care funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    24report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to New York Foundation for Elder Care?

    Find your warmest path to New York Foundation for Elder Care through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines