· Private foundation
New Mexico Broadcasters Association Foundation Inc
To promote and sponsor educational and research activities related to the field of broadcasting, primarily by awarding fellowships to student interns in the broadcasting industry.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 77% of New Mexico Broadcasters Association Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Assistance League of Albuquerque | $8,400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,400 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,200 |
| UNM Foundation Inc | $2,100 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,100 |
| Gila Community and Tourism | $2,000 |
| UNM Childrens Hospital | $2,000 |
| Las Cruces Public School Foundation | $2,000 |
| Roadrunner Food BAnk | $2,000 |
| Sheris House of Hope | $2,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
9 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2021, 3 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ALAssistance League of Albuquerque3× · 2018–2021 · $12k · revenue +43%
- UCUNM Childrens Hospital4× · 2018–2021 · $8k
- PTPNM TNMP FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2021 · $4k · revenue -52%
Funded once
- AEAPS Education Foundationone grant, 2020 · $6k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2020 · $2k
- TOTOUR OF THE GILA INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +51%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The food depot fosters healthy communities by engaging a network of partners and developing solutions to create a hunger-free new mexico.
To protect animals by creating systemic change resulting in the humane treatment of all animals. we create policies, infrastructure, and services that protect animals and strengthen our communities, and we design and implement humane and…
Feed New Mexico Kids, Inc. is on a mission to eradicate childhood hunger in New Mexico. Through donations of nutritious stackable food items that a child of the age of five years old and up may open and eat on the spot. We aim to provide…
To ensure that government is accountable to the voters and taxpayers.
Our mission is to bridge the gap of hunger and food insecurity for the residents of Southern Luna County, New Mexico with a specific focus on the Columbus, New Mexico area. Serving an area of 880 square miles, we strive to create a…
Cooking with kids educates and empowers children and families to make healthy food choices through hands-on nutrition education with fresh, affordable foods.
Emergency charitable relief
Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.
The mission of the new mexico chronic disease prevention council (cdpc) is to reduce common risk factors for the chronic diseases of arthritis, cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, lung disease, and osteoporosis by: -advocating for…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa De Peregrinos and the most unlike its peers is Pnm Tnmp Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 127 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Assistance League of Albuquerque ↗
- Who funds PNM TNMP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Sheris House of Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH CENTRAL NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds TOUR OF THE GILA INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds BROADCASTERS FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds CASA DE PEREGRINOS ↗
- Who funds LAS CRUCES PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE HARTLEY HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Mexico Broadcasters Association Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.