Skip to content

· Private foundation

New England Biolabs Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
117
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$235k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Environment$2.8MCivil Rights$1.4MAnimals$633kFood & Nutrition$369kArts & Culture$358kInternational$317kEducation$163kHealth$89kOther$0
02FY2024 · 117 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k91 grants · $310k
  • $10k–50k24 grants · $416k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $335k
$3,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CREATIVE ACTION INSTITUTE$234,500
CULTURAL SURVIVAL$100,000
GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL$25,000
GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND$25,000
AMERICAN BIRD CONSERVANCY$25,000
ECOLOGIC DEVELOPMENT FUND$20,000
ESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION$20,000
MASSACHUSETTS AUDUBON SOCIETY INC (MASS AUDUBON)$20,000
IPSWICH RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION$20,000
AMAZON WATCH$20,000
GUANACASTE DRY FOREST CONSERVATION FUND$20,000
FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL$20,000
SALEM SOUND COASTWATCH (SSCW)$20,000
GROUNDSWELL INTERNATIONAL$20,000
MADRE$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 72% of grant dollars ($5.1M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 28% that went abroad ($2.0M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%INGA FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%GLOBAL DIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1k → 9%INGA FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%GLOBAL DIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $519 → 9%NEW ENGLAND INTERNATIONAL DONORS: $1k → 16%THE INGA FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%NEW ENGLAND INTERNATIONAL DONORS: $1k → 16%THE INGA FOUNDATION: $8k → 13%INGA FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%THE INGA FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%NEW ENGLAND INTERNATIONAL DONORS: $450 → 16%INGA FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%GLOUCESTER CELEBRATION CORPORATION: $5k → 10%GLOUCESTER CELEBRATION CORPORATION: $1k → 10%SUNFLOWER OF PEACE: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
NH
WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
PA
RI
CA
CO
NE
VA
MD
NC
DC
HI
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 28% of all-years giving ($2.0M)

13 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Cameroon$542k · 129 grants
Ghana$320k · 70 grants
Peru$289k · 64 grants
Guatemala$163k · 32 grants
Ecuador$156k · 34 grants
United Kingdom$116k · 21 grants
Honduras$103k · 19 grants
Nicaragua$102k · 23 grants
Belize$94k · 19 grants
Bolivia$89k · 19 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of New England Biolabs Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 47% of the giving stays in MA; by stated purpose, 43%.

New England Biolabs Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 42% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.8M · 198 repeat orgs$534k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

198 repeat relationships: 98 still active in FY2024, 100 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

198
108

Total granted

$5.8M
$438k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+22%

Still filing today

39%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalArts & CultureAnimalsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CREATIVE ACTION INSTITUTE INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $955k · revenue +583% · 26% of their budget
  • CS
    CULTURAL SURVIVAL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $330k · revenue +294%
  • LI
    Land is Life Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $120k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • FF
    FAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +554%
  • BI
    BAY ISLANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $21k
  • MF
    MASSACHUSETTS FOUNDATION FOR THE HUMANITIES & PUBLIC POLICY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nature and Culture International

Nature and culture international conserves biologically diverse landscapes in latin america, in concert with local cultures, for the well-being of the planet.

Environment
2
Natura International Inc

Natura International conserves rainforests and other key natural ecosystems and the endangered species they contain through creation of protected areas in collaboration with local governments and communities in Latin America. In this way…

Public Benefit
3
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
4
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
5
Endangered Species International

Endangered Species International is strongly committed to reversing the trend of human-induced species extinction, saving endangered animals, and preserving wild places.

Animals
6
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
7
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
8
Galapagos Conservancy Inc

Our organization's mission is "conserving galpagos for nature and community," which we realize by saving imperiled species, restoring ecosystems, and building a more sustainable society in the galapagos archipelago.

—
9
Wild Earth Allies Inc

Our mission is to protect vital areas of our natural world for the benefit of wildlife, habitats, and people by inspiring collaborative action. Our vision is a world where wildlife and people flourish in healthy ecosystems that sustain us…

Environment
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
Rainforest Foundation Inc

The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.

Environment
12
The Amazon Biodiversity Center

To advance the preservation of the amazon rainforest and conservation research and to disseminate knowledge regarding the impact of human development and climate change on the diversity of the ecosystem, wildlife, and plant life of the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grassroots International Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lynn Museum and Historical Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

114 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 114 of the 327 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
35
Early backer (in before they grew)
111/114
Grantees still filing
84/114
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Land is Life Inc: $119,500 · Other+143 more: $2,584,030 · Other+143 moreCREATIVE ACTION INSTITUTE INC: $954,500 · Arts & CultureCREATIVE ACTION INSTI…PACHAMAMAS PATH INC: $75,750 · Arts & CulturePACHAMAMAS PATH INC+6 more: $118,640 · Arts & Culture+6 moreECO-LOGIC DEVELOPMENT FUND: $101,000 · EnvironmentECO-LOGIC DEVELO…GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $85,000 · EnvironmentGLOBAL GREENGRAN…IPSWICH RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $85,000 · EnvironmentIPSWICH RIVER WA…OCEANA INC: $81,600 · EnvironmentOCEANA INCAmazon Watch Inc: $77,500 · EnvironmentAmazon Watch IncGUANACASTE DRY FOREST CONSERVATION FUND: $73,600 · EnvironmentGUANACASTE DRY F…ESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION: $69,500 · EnvironmentESSEX COUNTY GRE…OnePlanet USA Inc: $60,000 · EnvironmentOnePlanet USA In…+15 more: $270,200 · Environment+15 moreEL PORVENIR: $81,500 · InternationalGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $77,450 · InternationalMARALLIANCE: $70,740 · InternationalGroundswell International Inc: $57,000 · InternationalMADRE INC: $56,000 · InternationalINMED PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN INC: $38,000 · InternationalMESOAMERICAN DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CORPORATION: $17,500 · International+4 more: $41,300 · InternationalNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $94,000 · AnimalsAmerican Bird Conservancy: $90,500 · AnimalsPAN AFRICAN SANCTUARY ALLIANCE INC: $69,300 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation Society: $52,600 · AnimalsClearwater Marine Aquarium Inc: $25,000 · AnimalsREWILD: $20,400 · Animals+2 more: $16,500 · AnimalsCULTURAL SURVIVAL INC: $330,000 · Civil RightsBACKYARD GROWERS INC: $72,000 · Food & NutritionARTISTS FOR SOUP INC: $39,300 · Food & NutritionGROWING HOPE GLOBALLY: $39,000 · Food & NutritionThe Food Project Inc: $26,500 · Food & NutritionTHREE SISTERS GARDEN PROJECT INC: $18,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,703,530Arts & Culture$1,148,890Environment$903,400International$439,490Animals$368,300Civil Rights$330,000Food & Nutrition$194,800

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCREATIVE ACTION INSTITUTE INC: $954,500 over 7y, 26% of budgetCULTURAL SURVIVAL INC: $330,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetLand is Life Inc: $119,500 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetECO-LOGIC DEVELOPMENT FUND: $101,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetNEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION: $94,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Bird Conservancy: $90,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND: $85,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetIPSWICH RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $85,000 over 7y, 1.5% of budgetOCEANA INC: $81,600 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetEL PORVENIR: $81,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetAmazon Watch Inc: $77,500 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetGRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC: $77,450 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPACHAMAMAS PATH INC: $75,750 over 7y, 32% of budgetGUANACASTE DRY FOREST CONSERVATION FUND: $73,600 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetBACKYARD GROWERS INC: $72,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetMARALLIANCE: $70,740 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION: $69,500 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetPAN AFRICAN SANCTUARY ALLIANCE INC: $69,300 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetANDEAN ALLIANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: $68,000 over 7y, 6.5% of budgetOnePlanet USA Inc: $60,000 over 6y, 6.7% of budgetGroundswell International Inc: $57,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMADRE INC: $56,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $52,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $48,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRAW ART WORKS INC: $43,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetINGA FOUNDATION: $40,000 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetARTISTS FOR SOUP INC: $39,300 over 6y, 16% of budgetGROWING HOPE GLOBALLY: $39,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetINMED PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN INC: $38,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetCamino Verde Inc: $35,600 over 5y, 4.9% of budgetLEAP for Education Inc: $32,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetESSEX NATIONAL HERITAGE COMMISSION INC: $29,800 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetKESTREL EDUCATIONAL ADVENTURES INC: $29,800 over 6y, 11% of budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $28,700 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBEYOND WALLS INC: $28,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetIPSWICH MUSEUM INC: $27,300 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetEXPLORING SOLUTIONS PAST THE MAYA FOREST ALLIANCE: $27,000 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetThe Food Project Inc: $26,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetE-TECH INTERNATIONAL: $26,500 over 4y, 13% of budgetFAUNA & FLORA INTERNATIONAL USA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetClearwater Marine Aquarium Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMERRIMACK RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL INC: $23,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetThe Ocean Foundation: $21,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGLOUCESTER STAGE COMPANY INC: $21,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetREWILD: $20,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE ANN ART HAVEN INC: $18,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetTHREE SISTERS GARDEN PROJECT INC: $18,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CREATIVE ACTION INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds CULTURAL SURVIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Land is Life Inc ↗
  • Who funds ECO-LOGIC DEVELOPMENT FUND ↗
  • Who funds NEW ENGLAND AQUARIUM CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds American Bird Conservancy ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL GREENGRANTS FUND ↗
  • Who funds IPSWICH RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds OCEANA INC ↗
  • Who funds EL PORVENIR ↗
  • Who funds Amazon Watch Inc ↗
  • Who funds GRASSROOTS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PACHAMAMAS PATH INC ↗
  • Who funds GUANACASTE DRY FOREST CONSERVATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds BACKYARD GROWERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MARALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ESSEX COUNTY GREENBELT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds PAN AFRICAN SANCTUARY ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ANDEAN ALLIANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds OnePlanet USA Inc ↗
  • Who funds Groundswell International Inc ↗
  • Who funds MADRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds RAW ART WORKS INC ↗
  • Who funds INGA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS FOR SOUP INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWING HOPE GLOBALLY ↗
  • Who funds INMED PARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds Camino Verde Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Essex County Community Foundation IncMA52.9× affinity25 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity Charitable Foundation Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Brace Cove Foundation Inc · The Applied Materials Foundation · American Tower Corporation Foundation Inc · Globalgiving Foundation Inc · The Peter and Elizabeth C Tower Foundation · Rsf Social Finance Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New England Biolabs Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New England Biolabs Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 330%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Global Diversity Foundation Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Essex National Heritage Commission Inc: 87% of income from government
  • Northeast Arc Inc: 73% of income from government
  • Pan African Sanctuary Alliance Inc: 68% of income from government
  • Ipswich River Watershed Association: 68% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Foundation for the Humanities & Public Policy Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Bike to the Sea Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Salem Sound 2000 Inc: 20% of income from government
  • Citizens Inn Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • New England Aquarium Corporation: 12% of income from government
  • Lynn Shelter Association Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Leap for Education Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Essex County Greenbelt Association: 8% of income from government
  • Raw Art Works Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Northeastern University: 7% of income from government
  • The Center for Independent Documentary Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Beyond Walls Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Manship Artist Residence and Studios Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Three Sisters Garden Project Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Actors Studio of Newburyport Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Essex County Community Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Clearwater Marine Aquarium Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Cape Ann Art Haven Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Green Beverly 107Q Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
33get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to New England Biolabs Foundation?

Find your warmest path to New England Biolabs Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 327 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on New England Biolabs’ filings →

More from the funding graph