Skip to content
New Earth Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

New Earth Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$22k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Social Science$28kEnvironment$17kFood & Nutrition$11kInternational$10kCommunity Improvement$6kEmployment$5kCrime & Legal$5kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORESIGHT INSTITUTE$4,500
UNADILLA COMMUNITY FARM EDUCATION CENTER INC$3,000
BEYOND THE BARS INC$3,000
THINK REGENERATION NFP$1,500
UNIFIED BLACK CAUCUS INC$1,500
BEHEARD$1,500
WORLD WILDLIFE RESCUE INCORPORATED$1,500
FORESIGHT INSTITUTE$1,460
WORLDWIDE OPPORTUNITIES ON ORGANIC FARMS - USA$1,000
SEACOLOGY$1,000
CENTER FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY AND APPROPRIATE TECHNO$1,000
TERAVANA TRUST$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1k → 13%STEPUP DURHAM: $3k → 11%THINK REGENERATION NFP: $2k → 9%INGA FOUNDATION: $2k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
MI
NY
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
NC
SC
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 12% of New Earth Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

New Earth Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 10% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44k · 7 repeat orgs$57k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +114% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
36

Total granted

$44k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+114%
+31%

Still filing today

71%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 41% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentInternationalHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IO
    Inside Out Network Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $5k · revenue +114%
  • UC
    UNADILLA COMMUNITY FARM EDUCATION CENTER INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +239%
  • WI
    WHOLIVES INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +414%

Funded once

  • IG
    I Grow Chicago NFP
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue -69%
  • STEPUP DURHAMgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +31%
  • SA
    SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +156%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sustainable Growers
—
2
Regenerative Farms Inc

To scale up forest protection and transition to regenerative agriculture by incubating adoption of the Regeneration Hub model. RF fulfills its Mission to catalyze planetary regeneration, empower women & indigenous communities in order to…

Food & Nutrition
3
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
4
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
5
Seed Peace

To grow the local food supply by supporting farmers, preparing food plants for climate change and increasing health giving food availability for people in need

—
6
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
7
Development in Gardening

Development in Gardening is improving the nutrition and livelihoods of some of the world's most uniquely marginalized people by teaching them to plant regenerative gardens that grow health, wealth, and a sense of belonging.

Community Improvement
8
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
9
Farmers for Forests Inc

The mission of Farmers for Forests (F4F) is to restore and protect green cover in India in close partnership with farmers and indigenous communities. All the on-ground work is enabled by AI and multi-spectral drone technology and satellite…

Human Services
10
A Greener World

A Greener World empowers sustainable solutions in agriculture, promoting and supporting real-life farming models to the public and offering farmers and ranchers practical guidance, resources and support on achieving truly sustainable…

Food & Nutrition
11
Multinational Exchange for Sustainable a Mesa andor Mesa Inc

MESA connects and cultivates sustainable farmers and food systems leaders around the world.

Education
12
Natura Bolivia Foundation

The Natura Bolivia Foundation is dedicated to implementing, and evaluating the impact of conservation and development programs, with a focus on watershed conservation, protected areas, and incentive based conservation in Bolivia. We work…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc; the most unlike its peers is Inga Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
40/41
Grantees still filing
24/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FORESIGHT INSTITUTE: $27,960 · OtherFORESIGHT INSTITUTEI Grow Chicago NFP: $3,000 · OtherSimple Promise Farms: $2,000 · Other+23 more: $24,000 · Other+23 moreHARVESTING 4 HAITI FOUNDATION: $2,500 · InternationalHARVESTING …GLOBAL SEED SAVERS: $2,000 · InternationalGLOBAL SEED…WHOLIVES INC: $2,000 · InternationalWHOLIVES IN…CENTER FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY AND APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY FOR THE ENVI: $1,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR …WILD TOMORROW FUND: $1,000 · InternationalWILD TOMORR…MYRIAD USA INC: $1,000 · InternationalMYRIAD USA …MISSIONCLEANWATER: $500 · InternationalSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $2,400 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND…Rios to Rivers: $2,000 · EnvironmentRios to Ri…OUR CLIMATE EDUCATION FUND: $1,000 · EnvironmentOUR CLIMAT…BURN DESIGN LAB: $1,000 · EnvironmentBURN DESIG…GREEN AMENDMENTS FOR THE GENERATIONS: $1,000 · EnvironmentGREEN AMEN…PHOENIX CONSERVANCY: $1,000 · EnvironmentPHOENIX CO…CHARCOAL PROJECT INC: $500 · EnvironmentTHE CENTER FOR DEMOCRATIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS: $500 · EnvironmentUNADILLA COMMUNITY FARM EDUCATION CENTER INC: $4,500 · Food & NutritionUNADILLA …Fundamental Needs Inc: $2,000 · Food & NutritionFundament…Common Good City Farm: $1,000 · Food & NutritionCommon Go…Worldwide Opportunities on Organic Farms USA: $1,000 · Food & NutritionWorldwide…Inside Out Network Inc: $4,500 · Crime & LegalBEYOND THE BARS INC: $3,000 · Crime & LegalSTEPUP DURHAM: $3,000 · Human ServicesINGA FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHINK REGENERATION: $1,500 · Human ServicesSUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesFLOWER HILL INSTITUTE: $2,000 · Arts & CultureThreaded Together: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$56,960International$10,000Environment$9,400Food & Nutrition$8,500Crime & Legal$7,500Human Services$7,000Arts & Culture$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInside Out Network Inc: $4,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetUNADILLA COMMUNITY FARM EDUCATION CENTER INC: $4,500 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetI Grow Chicago NFP: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPUP DURHAM: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBEYOND THE BARS INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHARVESTING 4 HAITI FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSimple Promise Farms: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGLOBAL SEED SAVERS: $2,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetWHOLIVES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLOWER HILL INSTITUTE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRios to Rivers: $2,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFundamental Needs Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINGA FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEARTH LAW CENTER: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHINK REGENERATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBeHeard Movement Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOUR CLIMATE EDUCATION FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTERAVANA TRUST F/K/A WELLKIND TRUST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY AND APPROPRIATE TECHNOLOGY FOR THE ENVI: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBURN DESIGN LAB: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEARTHLINKS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJMJ FIRE PROTECTION FOUNDATION Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetEATS Park City: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCommon Good City Farm: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREEN AMENDMENTS FOR THE GENERATIONS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSEACOLOGY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILD TOMORROW FUND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThreaded Together: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCOLORADO RISING FOR COMMUNITIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWorldwide Opportunities on Organic Farms USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHOENIX CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMISSIONCLEANWATER: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCleveland Owns: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL WE SERVE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCONSERVATION VOLUNTEERS INTERNATIONAL PROGRAM: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR DEMOCRATIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL RIGHTS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

PatagoniaorgResources Legacy FundImpactassetsincEarth Rising Foundati…The Partnership Proje…Clif Family FoundationSilicon Valley Commun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…American Endowment Fo…Charities Aid Foundat…Network for Good
PatagoniaorgCA17.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Patagoniaorg · Resources Legacy Fund · Impactassetsinc · Earth Rising Foundation · The Partnership Project Inc · Clif Family Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Earth Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Earth Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Earth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home