Skip to content
New Day Nevada at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

New Day Nevada

NEW DAY NEVADA is dedicated to helping hard working nevadans who play by the rules, but who nonetheless cannot get ahead.

$841k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$450k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Civil Rights$4.1MPublic Benefit$293kHousing & Shelter$250kCommunity Improvement$20kPhilanthropy$10k
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $61k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+2 grants · $730k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$461k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW DAY NEVADA PAC$450,000
INSTITUTE FOR PROGRESSIVE NEVADA$280,000
NEVADA LEGISLATIVE VICTORY$50,000
BATTLE BORN PROGRESS$31,050
NCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES$20,000
NEVADA ALLIANCE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MI FAMILIA VOTA: $15k → 11%For Our Future Action Fund: $20k → 14%New Day NV PAC: $3.2M → 10%One Apia Nevada: $15k → 13%NEW DAY NEVADA PAC: $450k → 10%Nevada Legislative Victory: $15k → 13%Home Means Nevada: $250k → 13%NEVADA STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY: $105k → 13%INSTITUTE FOR PROGRESSIVE NEVADA: $280k → 13%Institute for Progressive NV: $149k → 13%Battle Born Progress: $32k → 13%Battle Born Progress: $15k → 13%NEVADA LEGISLATIVE VICTORY: $50k → 13%Patrot Freedom Fund: $78k → 13%NEVADA ALLIANCE: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 4 repeat orgs$513k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
6

Total granted

$4.2M
$483k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+132%
+244%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementInternationalPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    New Day NV PAC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $3.6M
  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR A PROGRESSIVE NEVADA
    2× · 2022–2024 · $429k · revenue +132% · 31% of their budget
  • BB
    BATTLE BORN PROGRESS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $78k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • HM
    Home Means Nevada Inc HMN
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -80%
  • NS
    NEVADA STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
    one grant, 2020 · $105k
  • PF
    Patrot Freedom Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $78k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Native Voters Alliance Nevada

To uplift the indigenous community by building political power.

—
2
Fair Government Nevada

To promote fair government practices and for all other legal purposes

—
3
Nevada Legal Services Inc

To ensure equal access to justice for low-income nevadans.

Crime & Legal
4
Opportunity Alliance Nevada

Partner to provide tools to grow financial capability in nv

Education
5
Indigenous Voices Nevada

Empowering nevadas native communities from the ground up. by us, for us. amplifying indigenous voices of change.

—
6
Immunize Nevada

Immunize nevada advocates for and educates about the benefits of vaccines and fosters statewide collaboration to achieve nevada's health priorities.

Health
7
Nevada Advocates for Planned Parenthood Affiliates

Nevada advocates for planned parenthood affiliates is the lobbying, education and political arm for the planned parenthood affiliates in nevada

—
8
Nevada Succeeds

Our membership is united in pursuit of immediate and continuous improvements to the state's education system. we support an ambitious, agressive and comprehensive reform agenda to dramatically increase the college and workforce readiness…

—
9
Nebraska Votes

The organization's purpose is to ensure a fair and modern democracy in nebraska through research, education, and advocacy for policies and practices that promote participation in democracy.

Civil Rights
10
Healthy Nevada
Health
11
Progressive Leadership Alliance of Nevada

To create more humane solutions to nevadas problems

Civil Rights
12
New Day Nevada

New day nevada is dedicated to helping hard working nevadans who play by the rules, but who nonetheless cannot get ahead. from stagnating wages to growing medical and educational costs, working families keeps getting the raw end of the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Institute for a Progressive Nevada; the most unlike its peers is Home Means Nevada Inc Hmn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

New Day NV PAC: $3,624,500 · OtherNew Day NV PAC+5 more: $278,000 · Other+5 moreINSTITUTE FOR A PROGRESSIVE NEVADA: $429,300 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE …+1 more: $14,625 · Civil RightsHome Means Nevada Inc HMN: $250,000 · Housing & ShelterBATTLE BORN PROGRESS: $78,250 · Community ImprovementNCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES: $20,000 · Public BenefitONE APIA NEVADA: $15,000 · InternationalTIDES FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$3,902,500Civil Rights$443,925Housing & Shelter$250,000Community Improvement$78,250Public Benefit$20,000International$15,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSTITUTE FOR A PROGRESSIVE NEVADA: $429,300 over 2y, 31% of budgetHome Means Nevada Inc HMN: $250,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetBATTLE BORN PROGRESS: $78,250 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetFOR OUR FUTURE ACTION FUND: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNCSL FOUNDATION FOR STATE LEGISLATURES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetONE APIA NEVADA: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMI FAMILIA VOTA: $14,625 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetNEVADA ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIDES FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nevada AllianceAmerican Federation o…Sixteen Thirty FundHopewell FundTides FoundationGrove Action FundStrategic Victory FundState Engagement FundWay to Win Action Fun…
Nevada AllianceNV20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nevada Alliance · American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees · Sixteen Thirty Fund · Hopewell Fund · Tides Foundation · Grove Action Fund · Strategic Victory Fund · State Engagement Fund · Way to Win Action Fund Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Day Nevada funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Day Nevada. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to New Day Nevada?

    Find your warmest path to New Day Nevada through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Day Nevada’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home