Skip to content

· Community foundation

New Bremen Foundation Inc

The mission of the new bremen foundation is to provide funds to support scientific, literary, educational, religious, or governmental organizations, or towards other charitable activity in or affecting the new bremen area (within a 200-mile radius of the village of new bremen, ohio).

$934k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$192k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Youth Development$1.8MRecreation & Sports$1.2MEducation$1.1MHuman Services$262kReligion$249kArts & Culture$138kMembership Benefit$71kFood & Nutrition$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $756,143, the rows itemized in this filing. The $934,242 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $178,099 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $208k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $535k
$39,279
Median grant
3
States reached
$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW BREMEN LOCAL SCHOOLS$191,595
AUGLAIZE COUNTY LIBRARIES$153,206
FIRST NATIONAL BANK$119,238
RAY'S REFRIGERATION INC$70,581
NEW KNOXVILLE ATHLETIC BOOSTERS$46,861
AUGLAIZE MERCER YMCA$43,833
GAMETIME CO DWA RECREATION INC$39,279
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$30,000
HOLY REDEEMER CHURCH$20,860
ST PAUL UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST$13,690
LOCK ONE COMMUNITY ARTS$13,000
NEW BREMEN NEW KNOXVILLE ROTARY CLUB$7,500
ARTS PLACE$6,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GRACEWORKS LUTHERAN SERVICES: $7k → 14%GRACEWORKS LUTHERAN SERVICES: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of New Bremen Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in OH; by stated purpose, 90%.

New Bremen Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 15 repeat orgs$2.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +41% since the first grant, against -35% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
27

Total granted

$2.1M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
-35%

Still filing today

33%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $331k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsHealthReligionEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AY
    AUGLAIZEMERCER YMCA FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $88k · revenue ×16 · 29% of their budget
  • LO
    LOCK ONE COMMUNITY ARTS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $52k · revenue +45%
  • GL
    GRACEWORKS LUTHERAN SERVICES
    2× · 2017–2020 · $13k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • NK
    NEW KNOXVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1.7M
  • HD
    HA DORSTEN INC
    one grant, 2020 · $361k
  • LS
    LMC SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2023 · $99k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Bremen Historic Association

for the collection and preservation of the history of New Bremen

Arts & Culture
2
Canfield Heritage Foundation

Museum

Arts & Culture
3
New Washington Ohio Historical Society

Maintain historical society

Arts & Culture
4
Smithville Community Historical Society Inc

To collect and preserve any and all historic materials books artifacts machinery etc.

Arts & Culture
5
Sp Jermain Historical Golf Foundation
Arts & Culture
6
Newcomerstown Historical Society

The purpose of the organization is to do all in its power to collect all the available historical material connected with or associated with the history of newcomerstown, ohio and carefully to preserve the same. the objectives shall…

—
7
Middleburg Heights Historical Society

Non profit historical society

Arts & Culture
8
Pomerene Center for the Arts

Promotion of the arts.

Arts & Culture
9
North Ridgeville Historical Society

The collection, preservation and display of historical materials concerning the city of north ridgeville, ohio. the acquisition, marking and maintenance of suitable museums and places of historic interest.

—
10
Uniontown Community Park Association

Operate and Maintain a Community Park

—
11
The Castle Museum

None

Arts & Culture
12
Friends of Memorial Park

The purpose of the organization shall be to promote public interest in memorial park's historic, educational, cultural, recreational and natural assets. it is organized exclusively for charitable purposes to assist in sustaining memorial…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dayton History; the most unlike its peers is New Knoxville Community Park Assoc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
6/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW KNOXVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATION: $1,709,397 · OtherNEW KNOXVILLE BOARD OF EDUCATIONNEW BREMEN SCHOOLS: $584,213 · OtherNEW BREMEN SCHOOLSFIRST NATIONAL BANK: $430,940 · OtherFIRST NATIONAL BANKHA DORSTEN INC: $360,731 · OtherHA DORSTEN INCNEW BREMEN LOCAL SCHOOLS: $297,709 · OtherNEW BREMEN LOCAL SCHOOLSAUGLAIZE COUNTY LIBRARIES: $153,206 · Other+33 more: $1,025,903 · Other+33 moreNEW KNOXVILLE COMMUNITY PARK ASSOC: $205,493 · Recreation & Sports+1 more: $5,500 · Recreation & SportsLOCK ONE COMMUNITY ARTS INC: $52,000 · Arts & CulturePYRAMID HILL SCULPTURE PARK &MUSEUM: $15,000 · Arts & CultureDAYTON HISTORY: $5,000 · Arts & CultureRANGER ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $46,861 · EducationGRACEWORKS LUTHERAN SERVICES: $12,500 · Human ServicesNEW BREMEN GERMAN TOWNSHIP FIRE FOUNDATION: $12,000 · HealthMARIA STEIN SHRINE OF THE HOLY RELICS: $5,150 · Religion
Other$4,562,099Recreation & Sports$210,993Arts & Culture$72,000Education$46,861Human Services$12,500Health$12,000Religion$5,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW KNOXVILLE COMMUNITY PARK ASSOC: $205,493 over 2y, 67% of budgetAUGLAIZEMERCER YMCA FOUNDATION INC: $87,666 over 2y, 29% of budgetLOCK ONE COMMUNITY ARTS INC: $52,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetRANGER ATHLETIC BOOSTERS: $46,861 over 1y, 17% of budgetARTS PLACE INC: $36,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetPYRAMID HILL SCULPTURE PARK &MUSEUM: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGRACEWORKS LUTHERAN SERVICES: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW BREMEN GERMAN TOWNSHIP FIRE FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF NEW BREMEN-NEW KNOXVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 13% of budgetCHICKASAW COMMUNITY PARK ASSOCIATIO: $5,500 over 1y, 22% of budgetMARIA STEIN SHRINE OF THE HOLY RELICS: $5,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDAYTON HISTORY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW KNOXVILLE COMMUNITY PARK ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds AUGLAIZEMERCER YMCA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LOCK ONE COMMUNITY ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds RANGER ATHLETIC BOOSTERS ↗
  • Who funds ARTS PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds PYRAMID HILL SCULPTURE PARK &MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds GRACEWORKS LUTHERAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NEW BREMEN GERMAN TOWNSHIP FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF NEW BREMEN-NEW KNOXVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dayton Foundation DepositoryOH16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dayton Foundation Depository · The Dayton Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Bremen Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Bremen Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to New Bremen Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to New Bremen Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Bremen’s filings →

    More from the funding graph