· Private foundation
Neshotah Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Take Note Studio | $1,100 |
| Alano Society | $1,100 |
| Ascend Services | $1,100 |
| Magic Mishicot Athletic Complex | $1,000 |
| Hear the Rohrer Cooking Class | $1,000 |
| St Vincent DePaul Society | $1,000 |
| CASA of East Central Wiscosin | $750 |
| Jefferson Elementary ParentFamily Solutions Team | $550 |
| Lighthouse Recovery Complex Center | $500 |
| Two Rivers Optimist Bike Give-A-Way | $500 |
| Shop with a Cop Two Rivers Two Rivers Police Department | $500 |
| American Legion Auxiliary Badger Girls State | $500 |
| KAN Cool for School | $500 |
| Invent Now | $500 |
| TRHSTwo Rivers Optimist Club Family Assistance Fund | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CTCamp Tapawingo3× · 2023–2025 · $5k
- HHHope House4× · 2021–2025 · $2k
- KOKites Over Lake Michigan Inc4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue -109%
Funded once
- TRTwo Rivers Parks & Recreationone grant, 2024 · $2k
- VVariousone grant, 2022 · $2k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Helping families and individuals experiencing homelessness achieve sustainable independence.
Childcare
Wisconsin court appointed special advocates (casa) association champions the needs of abused and neglected children by supporting and expanding local casa programs.
Casa is committed to speaking in the best interest of children, who are at risk for abuse and neglect. casa recruits, trains, & supports volunteers to serve at-risk children in the family court system.
House of hope green bay provides a safe and supportive place where youth and young families with children experiencing homelessness will be come confident, independent, and successful members of our community. house of hope envisions a…
The mission of timber lake playhouse is to provide the best expression of theater arts to the regional community by presenting creative works that entertain and inspire.
To guide and support families who face homelessness on their paths to stable homes.
The mission of casa for kids, inc. is to provide volunteer advocates to work independently for the best interest of each child service coming under the jurisdiction of michigan barry, eaton, and ingham county courts due to abuse and…
To create decent, affordable housing for those in need
Our mission is to advocate for abused and neglected children who are under court supervision in st. croix county with the goal of helping each child secure a safe and permanent home. we want each child to have a voice and a hopeful future.…
To provide safe, educational, quality care for children.
To provide shelter, crisis intervention, and supportive services for survivors of domestic and sexual abuse and their families, with a commitment to safety, respect and promoting self-determination.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of East Central Wisconsin and the most unlike its peers is Kites Over Lake Michigan Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Kites Over Lake Michigan Inc ↗
- Who funds ALANO SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ASCEND SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE FOSTER FAMILIES AND FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds TAKE NOTE STUDIO INC ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds WOODLAND DUNES NATURE CENTER AND PRESERVE INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF EAST CENTRAL WISCONSIN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ruth St John & John Dunham West Foundation Inc · Harold C Kallies Charitable Trust 32f003019 · Jane & Arthur Stangel Fund Inc · Lakeshore Community Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Neshotah Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Neshotah Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Neshotah Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.