· Private foundation
Harold C Kallies Charitable Trust 32f003019
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k10 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $105k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MANITOWOC YOUTH BASEBALL ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| INCOURAGE - DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CENTER | $10,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $10,000 |
| PAINTING PATHWAYS CLUBHOUSE | $10,000 |
| BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS | $10,000 |
| ASCEND INC | $10,000 |
| THE HARPER GROUP | $10,000 |
| HOPE HOUSE OF MANITOWOC COUNTY | $10,000 |
| THE HAVEN OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC | $10,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANITOWOC CTY | $10,000 |
| MANITOWOC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $7,000 |
| PETER'S PANTRY | $6,000 |
| TREEHOUSE THEATER | $6,000 |
| WISCONSIN MARITIME MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| GROW IT FORWARD INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
26 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- THTHE HAVEN OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC5× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +99%
- LCLAKESHORE CAP INC OF WISCONSIN5× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +73%
- BBBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC5× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- MFMANITOWOC FAMILY AQUATIC CENTERone grant, 2018 · $25k
- MPMANITOWOC POLICE DEPT K9 UNITone grant, 2022 · $3k
- SMST MARY ST MICHAELS SCHOOLone grant, 2018 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To create decent, affordable housing for those in need
Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.
Service for disabled adults
We believe in the hope and promise for people who want something better than the destruction of substance use disorder. we will help people find the residential and day treatment options, emotional tools, social connectedness, and…
To assist local businesses in their growth in the manitowoc county area and to attract new businesses to the manitowoc county area.
Our focus is on making shortterm investments which will significantly improve the longterm wellbeing of our clients. we will measure our performance against these standards by continuously communicating with our clients, and will take…
To protect environmentally senstive land in waukesha county wisconsin
The museum is an educational institution dedicated to preserving the history and culture of waukesha county.
Wisconsin progress recruits, trains, elects, and develops progressive candidates and leaders at the local and state legislative levels.
To provide shelter, crisis intervention, and supportive services for survivors of domestic and sexual abuse and their families, with a commitment to safety, respect and promoting self-determination.
The mission of help of door county, inc. is to eliminate domestic abuse through prevention and intervention services and to advocate for social change.
The Hope Center seeks out and teams with volunteers from congregations of many faiths.The Center is committed to serving people in need in Waukesha County, Wisconsin through financial assistance, food, child care, clothing and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lakeshore Cap Inc of Wisconsin and the most unlike its peers is Masquers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE HAVEN OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds LAKESHORE CAP INC OF WISCONSIN ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds PETERS PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds CAPITOL CIVIC CENTRE INC ↗
- Who funds WOODLAND DUNES NATURE CENTER AND PRESERVE INC ↗
- Who funds TREEHOUSE THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds MANITOWOC COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds INCOURAGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WISCONSIN MARITIME MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds ASCEND SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds GROW IT FORWARD INC ↗
- Who funds PAINTING PATHWAYS CLUBHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds MARCO SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS WISCONSIN INC ↗
- Who funds RAWHIDE INC ↗
- Who funds MASQUERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Ruth St John & John Dunham West Foundation Inc · Lakeshore Community Foundation Inc · Jane & Arthur Stangel Fund Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Nash Family Foundation · Wisconsin Public Service Foundation · Neshotah Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way Manitowoc County Inc · Donald J and Brenda J Debruyn Charitable Foundation Trust · Kohler Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Harold C Kallies Charitable Trust 32f003019 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Harold C Kallies Charitable Trust 32f003019?
Find your warmest path to Harold C Kallies Charitable Trust 32f003019 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.