Skip to content
Neponset Valley Tma Co Transaction Associates Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Neponset Valley Tma Co Transaction Associates Inc

The neponset valley tma is a member-based organiztion that was founded in 1995.

$1.0M
Granted FY2023
18
Grants FY2023
15
States reached
$91k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2023.

Community Improvement$563kHuman Services$556kHealth$180kPublic Benefit$100kEmployment$55k
02FY2023 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $316k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $714k
$55,465
Median grant
15
States reached
$176k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RURAL ECONOMIC ASST LEAGUE INC$91,098
RURAL HEALTH OF NEWORK OF SCNY INC$82,750
COMMUNITY COORDNIATED TRANSPORATION$82,433
BOLIVAR COUNTY COUNCIL OF AGING INC$80,401
PENQUIS CAP INC$76,048
COUNTY OF MITCHELL$69,578
CLINTON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM$65,457
CEDAR COUNTRY TRANSIT$58,201
MCCORMIK COUNTRY SENIOR CENTER$55,465
DISABILITY SERVICES INC$52,452
CHEMUNG SCHULYER COUNTERS CHAPTER$48,183
UPPER CUMBERLAND HUMAN RESOURCE$47,280
PARK COUNTY$45,772
FRESNO COUNTY RURAL TRANSIT AGENCY$45,420
EASTERN SIERRA TRANSIT AUTHORITY$42,465
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $456k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%RURAL ECONOMIC ASST LEAGUE INC: $91k → 25%MCCORMIK COUNTRY SENIOR CENTER: $55k → 17%DISABILITY SERVICES INC: $52k → 9%BOLIVAR COUNTY COUNCIL OF AGING INC: $80k → 29%MOUNTAIN EMPIRE OLDER CITIZENS INC: $38k → 22%WEST RIVER TRANSIT AUTHORITY INC: $20k → 11%RURAL ECONOMIC ASST LEAGUE INC: $9k → 25%MCCORMIK COUNTRY SENIOR CENTER: $45k → 17%DISABILITY SERVICES INC: $33k → 9%BOLIVAR COUNTY COUNCIL OF AGING INC: $16k → 29%MOUNTAIN EMPIRE OLDER CITIZENS INC: $16k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MT
WI
MI
NY
SD
CA
CO
NE
VA
TN
NC
SC
MS
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 18 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$1.4M
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+64%

Still filing today

50%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23
Human ServicesHealthPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MCCORMICK COUNTY SENIOR CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +26%
  • RE
    RURAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +14%
  • TR
    THE RURAL HEALTH NETWORK OF SCNY INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • WR
    WEST RIVER TRANSIT AUTHORITY INC DBA PRAIRIE HILLS TRANSITgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +64%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
River Bend Transit

The agency provides transportation services for the elderly, disabled, and general public.

Public Benefit
2
Ripley County Transit Inc

To provide transportation

Human Services
3
Ashe County Transportation Authority

Public transportation services to the general public including the elderly and disabled population

—
4
Rural Transit Services Inc

TO identify and service community transportation needs of senior citizens, disabled and low/moderate income residents in communities of Erie County by establishing transportation through Volunteer and Community Support Services.

Community Improvement
5
Senior Services Inc

Transporation services to the general public. This service is provided for the benefit of all of the general public of Alliance , NE area, Box Butte County and surrounding counties.

—
6
Rural Community Transportation Inc

To encourage the use, development and support of public transportation, to provide coordinated, consolidated, non-duplicative transportation services, and to promote the planning and development of public transportation for Vermonts…

Human Services
7
Perry County Council on Aging Inc

Provide transportation and activities to the elderly

Human Services
8
Amherst Senior Transportation Services Inc

Amherst senior transportation services, inc. (asts) is a not-for-profit agency committed to providing a special system of transportation to enhance quality of life and promote independence for persons 55 years of age or older.

—
9
Stoddard County Transit Services Inc

Provide transportation to handicapped individuals and senior citizens.

—
10
Johnson County Senior Services Inc

Provide transportation services to seniors living in johnson county and other services to make their lives better.

Human Services
11
Wells-Sheridan Co Aging Council Inc

Provide transportation for the elderly

—
12
Valley Transit

Provide public transportation to the matanuska-susitna community.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mccormick County Senior Center; the most unlike its peers is Rural Economic Assistance League Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CLINTON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM: $100,000 · OtherCLINTON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEMCOUNTY OF MITCHELL: $99,992 · OtherCOUNTY OF MITCHELLCEDAR COUNTRY TRANSIT: $97,800 · OtherCEDAR COUNTRY TRANSITCHEMUNG-SCHUYLER COUNTIES CHAPTER NYSARC INC: $80,000 · OtherCHEMUNG-SCHUYLER COUNTIES CHAPTER NYSARC INCPARK COUNTY: $66,172 · OtherPARK COUNTYSAWER COUNTY LCO TRANSIT COMMISSION: $60,016 · OtherSAWER COUNTY LCO TRANSIT COMMISSIONFRESNO COUNTY RURAL TRANSIT AGENCY: $59,485 · OtherFRESNO COUNTY RURAL TRANSIT AGENCYUPPER CUMBERLAND HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCY: $55,139 · OtherUPPER CUMBERLAND HUMAN RESOURCE AGENCYEASTERN SIERRA TRANSIT AUTHORITY: $51,628 · OtherEASTERN SIERRA TRANSIT AUTHORITYBENZIE TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY: $27,638 · OtherMCCORMICK COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $100,000 · Human ServicesMCCORMICK COUNTY SENIOR CENTERRURAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesRURAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INCPENQUIS CAP INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesPENQUIS CAP INCBolivar County Council on Aging Inc: $96,690 · Human ServicesBolivar County Council on Aging IncDISABILITY SERVICES INC: $85,388 · Human ServicesDISABILITY SERVICES INCMOUNTAIN EMPIRE OLDER CITIZENS INC: $53,703 · Human ServicesMOUNTAIN EMPIRE OLDER CITIZENS INCWEST RIVER TRANSIT AUTHORITY INC DBA PRAIRIE HILLS TRANSIT: $19,912 · Human ServicesTHE RURAL HEALTH NETWORK OF SCNY INC: $100,000 · HealthCommunity Coordinated Transportation Sys DBA River Cities Public Transit: $99,999 · Public Benefit
Other$697,870Human Services$555,693Health$100,000Public Benefit$99,999

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMCCORMICK COUNTY SENIOR CENTER: $100,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetRURAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTHE RURAL HEALTH NETWORK OF SCNY INC: $100,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetPENQUIS CAP INC: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Coordinated Transportation Sys DBA River Cities Public Transit: $99,999 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetBolivar County Council on Aging Inc: $96,690 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetDISABILITY SERVICES INC: $85,388 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCHEMUNG-SCHUYLER COUNTIES CHAPTER NYSARC INC: $80,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNTAIN EMPIRE OLDER CITIZENS INC: $53,703 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWEST RIVER TRANSIT AUTHORITY INC DBA PRAIRIE HILLS TRANSIT: $19,912 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Neponset Valley Tma Co Transaction Associates Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Neponset Valley Tma Co Transaction Associates Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Neponset Valley Tma Co Transaction Associates’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home