· Public charity
Neponset Valley Tma Co Transaction Associates Inc
The neponset valley tma is a member-based organiztion that was founded in 1995.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 48% of NEPONSET VALLEY TMA CO TRANSACTION ASSOCIATES INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- $10k–50k8 grants · $316k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $714k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RURAL ECONOMIC ASST LEAGUE INC | $91,098 |
| RURAL HEALTH OF NEWORK OF SCNY INC | $82,750 |
| COMMUNITY COORDNIATED TRANSPORATION | $82,433 |
| BOLIVAR COUNTY COUNCIL OF AGING INC | $80,401 |
| PENQUIS CAP INC | $76,048 |
| COUNTY OF MITCHELL | $69,578 |
| CLINTON AREA TRANSIT SYSTEM | $65,457 |
| CEDAR COUNTRY TRANSIT | $58,201 |
| MCCORMIK COUNTRY SENIOR CENTER | $55,465 |
| DISABILITY SERVICES INC | $52,452 |
| CHEMUNG SCHULYER COUNTERS CHAPTER | $48,183 |
| UPPER CUMBERLAND HUMAN RESOURCE | $47,280 |
| PARK COUNTY | $45,772 |
| FRESNO COUNTY RURAL TRANSIT AGENCY | $45,420 |
| EASTERN SIERRA TRANSIT AUTHORITY | $42,465 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $456k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMCCORMICK COUNTY SENIOR CENTER2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +26%
- RERURAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +14%
- TRTHE RURAL HEALTH NETWORK OF SCNY INC2× · 2022–2023 · $100k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- WRWEST RIVER TRANSIT AUTHORITY INC DBA PRAIRIE HILLS TRANSITgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue +64%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The agency provides transportation services for the elderly, disabled, and general public.
Community Transit is committed to providing coordinated transportation services to citizens in our service area by enhancing the quality of life, livability, self-sufficiency, and freedom through mobility. These goals are accomplished…
To provide transportation
Public transportation services to the general public including the elderly and disabled population
TO identify and service community transportation needs of senior citizens, disabled and low/moderate income residents in communities of Erie County by establishing transportation through Volunteer and Community Support Services.
Provide transportation and activities to the elderly
To provide reliable and safe transportation to chebeague island, me.
To encourage the use, development and support of public transportation, to provide coordinated, consolidated, non-duplicative transportation services, and to promote the planning and development of public transportation for Vermonts…
Amherst senior transportation services, inc. (asts) is a not-for-profit agency committed to providing a special system of transportation to enhance quality of life and promote independence for persons 55 years of age or older.
Transporation services to the general public. This service is provided for the benefit of all of the general public of Alliance , NE area, Box Butte County and surrounding counties.
Provide transportation services to seniors living in johnson county and other services to make their lives better.
Providing safe, efficient, affordable public transportation to area residents and visitors in accordance with local, state, and federal guidelines.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mccormick County Senior Center and the most unlike its peers is Rural Economic Assistance League Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MCCORMICK COUNTY SENIOR CENTER ↗
- Who funds RURAL ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds THE RURAL HEALTH NETWORK OF SCNY INC ↗
- Who funds PENQUIS CAP INC ↗
- Who funds Community Coordinated Transportation Sys DBA River Cities Public Transit ↗
- Who funds Bolivar County Council on Aging Inc ↗
- Who funds DISABILITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CHEMUNG-SCHUYLER COUNTIES CHAPTER NYSARC INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN EMPIRE OLDER CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds WEST RIVER TRANSIT AUTHORITY INC DBA PRAIRIE HILLS TRANSIT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Neponset Valley Tma Co Transaction Associates Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.