Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nem K Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$83kReligion$51kInternational$47kFood & Nutrition$35kPhilanthropy$31kEducation$10kHuman Services$6kScience & Tech$6k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$107k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SIDDHACHALAM$58,000
JAIN ADHYATMA ACADEMY OF NORTH AMERICA ( JAANA)$12,500
JAIPUR FOOT INC$12,500
EVERYORG$10,000
EKAL VIDHYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA$5,000
JAIN CENTER OF AMERICA$5,000
AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION USA$5,000
JAIN SAMAJ OF COLORADO$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BAPS Charities Inc: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$217k · 5 repeat orgs$161k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +15% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
13

Total granted

$217k
$79k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+15%

Still filing today

80%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +41%
  • LG
    LIFE GLOBAL INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $27k · revenue +38%
  • EV
    EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • IM
    INTERNATIONAL MAHAVIRA JAIN MISSION
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue 0%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • AI
    ARIHANTA INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
India Awareness Foundation Inc

Public education

Education
2
Varasiddhi
Arts & Culture
3
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Sri Karunamayi Institute of Vedic Studies and Meditation Center

The very essence of spirituality and religion lies in understanding the depth of ancient wisdom, connecting to the divine, and achieving inner peace. our organization, rooted in the profound teachings of vedic scriptures and the practice…

Religion
5
Ananta Giving Foundation

To provide support for charitable and educational organizations and initiatives in the united states and abroad, including but not limited to organizations and initiatives focused on providing and facilitating access to high quality…

Philanthropy
6
Give Foundation Inc

To increase overall charitable giving by creating a vibrant giving exchange

Human Services
7
Motwani Jadeja Global Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Sahayog Foundation
Community Improvement
9
Divyajyot Foundation Inc

Providing medical services to needy in india.

Religion
10
Bharat Swabhiman Overseas Inc

The mission of bharat swabhiman overseas inc is to organize and promote yoga, ayurveda and vedic sciences, and to help the communitiy so all children,adults and families have the same chance to succeed in school and in life by providing…

Arts & Culture
11
Nalanda 20

Improve excellence and access in higher education. Current focus is on India. Thus, Nalanda 2.0's current focus is to make India's higher education system world-class by building a world-class multidisciplinary research university,…

Education
12
Ignite Asha

Improve the human rights and self worth of south asian women and children on a global level.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Mahavira Jain Mission; the most unlike its peers is Center for Curiosity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SIDDHACHALAM: $58,000 · OtherSIDDHACHALAMJAIN CENTER OF AMERICA INC: $25,904 · OtherJAIN CENTER OF AMERICA INCIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJAIN ADHYATMA ACADEMY OF NORTH AMERICA ( JAANA): $12,500 · OtherJAIN ADHYATMA ACADEMY OF NORTH AMERICA …JVBNA: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+5 more: $5,950 · OtherJAIPUR FOOT INC: $89,500 · InternationalJAIPUR FOOT INCLIFE GLOBAL INC: $26,500 · InternationalLIFE GLOBAL INCEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $15,000 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USAAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $60,000 · Food & NutritionAKSHAYA PATRA FOU…INTERNATIONAL MAHAVIRA JAIN MISSION: $20,000 · ReligionARIHANTA INSTITUTE: $10,000 · EducationCENTER FOR CURIOSITY INC: $5,000 · EducationEVERY ORG: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $5,000 · HealthBAPS CHARITIES INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$132,354International$131,000Food & Nutrition$60,000Religion$20,000Education$15,000Philanthropy$10,000Health$5,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJAIPUR FOOT INC: $89,500 over 2y, 11% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA): $60,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLIFE GLOBAL INC: $26,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MAHAVIRA JAIN MISSION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetARIHANTA INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAPS CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CURIOSITY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JAIPUR FOOT INC ↗
  • Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
  • Who funds LIFE GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MAHAVIRA JAIN MISSION ↗
  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
  • Who funds ARIHANTA INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds EVERY ORG ↗
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds BAPS CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CURIOSITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nem K Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nem K Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nem K Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Nem K Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nem K’s filings →

    More from the funding graph