Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nem K Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Health$83kReligion$51kInternational$47kFood & Nutrition$35kPhilanthropy$31kEducation$10kHuman Services$6kScience & Tech$6k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$117k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL MAHAVIR JAIN MISSION$20,000
AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION USA$20,000
JAIN CENTER OF AMERICA$10,000
EKAL VIDHYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA$10,000
ARIHANTA INSTITUTE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BAPS Charities Inc: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$102k · 3 repeat orgs$166k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
12

Total granted

$102k
$126k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+41%

Still filing today

67%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationFood & NutritionHealthHuman ServicesReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $55k · revenue +41%
  • LG
    LIFE GLOBAL INC
    2× · 2021–2023 · $27k · revenue +38%
  • JC
    JAIN CENTER OF AMERICA INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $21k

Funded once

  • JF
    JAIPUR FOOT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $77k · revenue -14%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • J
    JVBNA
    one grant, 2023 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
India Awareness Foundation Inc

Public education

Education
2
Ananta Giving Foundation

To provide support for charitable and educational organizations and initiatives in the united states and abroad, including but not limited to organizations and initiatives focused on providing and facilitating access to high quality…

Philanthropy
3
Sri Karunamayi Institute of Vedic Studies and Meditation Center

The very essence of spirituality and religion lies in understanding the depth of ancient wisdom, connecting to the divine, and achieving inner peace. our organization, rooted in the profound teachings of vedic scriptures and the practice…

Religion
4
Varasiddhi
Arts & Culture
5
Divyajyot Foundation Inc

Providing medical services to needy in india.

Religion
6
Bharat Swabhiman Overseas Inc

The mission of bharat swabhiman overseas inc is to organize and promote yoga, ayurveda and vedic sciences, and to help the communitiy so all children,adults and families have the same chance to succeed in school and in life by providing…

Arts & Culture
7
International Foundation for Social Impact Inc

To promote education in the field of medical, engineering, management, computer software, hardware and information technology by establishing school, college, institution and education and research centre for upliftment of society, with a…

Education
8
Osho Niranjana

The primary purpose of this organization is to provide religious activities related to various meditations including osho meditations and spread message of spiritual masters like osho, krishnamurti, buddha and ramana maharshi.

Human Services
9
Give Foundation Inc

To increase overall charitable giving by creating a vibrant giving exchange

Human Services
10
Annapurna Global Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Global Educ Campaign

Dosti sets up and manages schools in asian countries

Philanthropy
12
International Hindu University Inc

Our mission as per the by-laws : a) the board adopts a strategic plan that includes goals which will lead to acquiring accreditation recognized by us department of education and maintaining it. this includes getting an accreditation from…

Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Mahavira Jain Mission and the most unlike its peers is Center for Curiosity Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JAIPUR FOOT INC — $77,000 · InternationalJAIPUR FOOT INCLIFE GLOBAL INC — $26,500 · InternationalLIFE GLOBAL INCEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA — $10,000 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USAJAIN CENTER OF AMERICA INC — $20,904 · OtherJAIN CENTER OF AMERICA …Individual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…JVBNA — $5,000 · OtherJVBNAIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…Individual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…+4 more — $4,450 · Other+4 moreAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) — $55,000 · Food & NutritionAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATIO…INTERNATIONAL MAHAVIRA JAIN MISSION — $20,000 · ReligionARIHANTA INSTITUTE — $10,000 · EducationCENTER FOR CURIOSITY INC — $5,000 · EducationTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $5,000 · HealthBAPS CHARITIES INC — $5,000 · Human Services
International$113,500Other$55,354Food & Nutrition$55,000Religion$20,000Education$15,000Health$5,000Human Services$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJAIPUR FOOT INC — $77,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) — $55,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetLIFE GLOBAL INC — $26,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MAHAVIRA JAIN MISSION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetARIHANTA INSTITUTE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR CURIOSITY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetTHE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAPS CHARITIES INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JAIPUR FOOT INC
  • Who funds AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA)
  • Who funds LIFE GLOBAL INC
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MAHAVIRA JAIN MISSION
  • Who funds ARIHANTA INSTITUTE
  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CURIOSITY INC
  • Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
  • Who funds BAPS CHARITIES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nem K Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nem K Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Nem K Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph