Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Nelson & Vera Hicks Charitable Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$259k
Granted FY2025still arriving
42
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 69% of NELSON & VERA HICKS CHARITABLE FDN’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k31 grants · $110k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $150k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY$26,000
ST AMBROSE ACADEMY$20,000
CHURCH HEALTH SERVICES$15,000
BEAVER DAM SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$12,500
MADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE$12,000
GREEN VALLEY ENTERPRISES & ALZHEIMER UNIT$12,000
MORAINE PARK TECHNICAL COLLEGE$12,000
WORLD ORPHAN FUND$10,000
CHARISH CLASSICAL ACADEMY$10,000
ST VINCENT DEPAUL BEAVER DAM$10,000
RAWHIDE BOYS RANCH$10,000
THERESA PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,000
LOMIRA PUBLIC LIBRARY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION CANCER CENTER$5,000
ST STEPHENS LUTHERN SCHOOL LIBRARY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $158k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $10k → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $10k → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $5k → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $5k → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $5k → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $5k → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $5k → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $5k → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $5k → 8%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY: $26k → 9%PAVE: $15k → 9%PAVE: $15k → 9%PAVE: $15k → 9%PAVE: $5k → 9%PAVE: $5k → 9%PAVE: $5k → 9%PAVE: $5k → 9%PAVE: $5k → 9%PAVE: $4k → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY: $1k → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY: $1k → 9%YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY: $1k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 55 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

55 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
2

Total granted

$2.3M
$10k

Still filing today

29%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthReligionPhilanthropyInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAINT AMBROSE ACADEMY INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +40%
  • CH
    CHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $135k · revenue +99%
  • BD
    BEAVER DAM SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $101k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARKS EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • RO
    REACH OUT AND READ - CHILDREN'S HEALTH ALLIANCE WI
    one grant, 2022 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Help of Door County Inc

The mission of help of door county, inc. is to eliminate domestic abuse through prevention and intervention services and to advocate for social change.

Health
2
Tall Oaks Academy Inc

Tall oaks academy seeks to partner with christian parents to raise up children in the nurture and admonition of the lord and to set them free from the enslavements of fallen humanity, by god's grace. the three pillars of freedom that we…

Education
3
Child Evangelism Fellowship of Wisconsin

Child evangelism fellowship is an evangelical, bible-centered mission whose purpose is to evangelize boys and girls with the gospel of the lord jesus christ and to establish (disciple) them in the word of god and in a local church for…

Youth Development
4
Wisconsin Independent Christian School Inc

Valley christian school pursues educational excellence through christ centered programs to produce servant leaders.

Education
5
A Door of Hope Pregnancy Center

A door of hope pregnancy center is a christ-centered organization that empowers people to make life-affirming and healthy decisions, particularly about sex, pregnancy and relationships.

Health
6
Dove Schools Inc

Operation of three charter school districts located at twelve sites in the tulsa and oklahoma city areas

Education
7
Pathways of Wisconsin Inc

Pathways of wisconsin provides supported employment opportunities and empowerment through quality, person-centered programming for individuals of all abilities.

Human Services
8
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of St Cloud

At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…

Human Services
9
Catholic Charities North Dakota

Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.

10
Wichita Adore Ministries

Bringing souls face to face with the Eucharistic Heart of Jesus Christ and forming missionaries of the New Evangelization. The organization has realized this mission by providing music and production services for worship events.

Religion
11
Dodge County Humane Society Inc

Humane society providing animal stray service and animal care including adoptions, redemptions, and surrenders for residents located in dodge county, wi and surrounding areas.

Animals
12
Our Lady of Hope Clinic Inc

Our lady of hope clinic is a direct primary care clinic that gives at least 55% of its services to the uninsured at no cost, consistent with the catholic health care tradition.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ymca of Dodge County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Pregnancy Support Center of Dodge County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%40%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr15%20%35–55yr16%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr18%30%10–20yr17%40%20–35yr15%13%35–55yr16%17%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/22
the rest of the field
15%
5,376/36,103

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MORAINE PARK TECHNICAL COLLEGE — $106,000 · OtherMORAINE PARK TECHNICAL COLLEGEBEAVER DAM AREA COMMUNITY THEATRE BUILDING PROJECT — $105,000 · OtherBEAVER DAM AREA COMMUNITY THEATRE BUILDING PROJECTIndividual grant recipient — $105,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE — $96,000 · OtherMADISON AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGEGREEN VALLEY ENTERPRISES & ALZHEIMER UNIT — $92,000 · OtherGREEN VALLEY ENTERPRISES & ALZHEIMER UNITST VINCENT DEPAUL BEAVER DAM — $90,000 · OtherST VINCENT DEPAUL BEAVER DAMRAWHIDE INC — $80,000 · Other+40 more — $968,000 · Other+40 moreSAINT AMBROSE ACADEMY INC — $150,000 · EducationSAINT AMBRO…CENTRAL WISCONSIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $45,000 · EducationCENTRAL WIS…CHARIS CLASSICAL ACADEMY INCORPORATED — $30,000 · EducationCHARIS CLAS…PEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT IN — $74,000 · Human ServicesThe World Orphan Fund Inc — $55,000 · Human ServicesYMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC — $29,000 · Human ServicesCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC — $135,000 · ReligionBEAVER DAM SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $100,500 · PhilanthropyThe Gathering Source Inc — $25,000 · Food & NutritionPREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER OF DODGE COUNTY INC — $20,000 · Membership Benefit
Other$1,642,000Education$225,000Human Services$158,000Religion$135,000Philanthropy$100,500Food & Nutrition$25,000Membership Benefit$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSAINT AMBROSE ACADEMY INC — $150,000 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetCHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC — $135,000 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetBEAVER DAM SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $100,500 over 9y, 5.0% of budgetRAWHIDE INC — $80,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT IN — $74,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetThe World Orphan Fund Inc — $55,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetCENTRAL WISCONSIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $45,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHARIS CLASSICAL ACADEMY INCORPORATED — $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetYMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC — $29,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Gathering Source Inc — $25,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetPREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER OF DODGE COUNTY INC — $20,000 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US — $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Dodge County and Watertown Community Inc — $18,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetArts for All Wisconsin Inc — $18,000 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetBridges of Dodge County Inc — $8,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetTHE ARC OF DODGE COUNTY INC — $4,500 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetBEAVER DAM COMMUNITY HOSPITALS FOUNDATION INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAINT AMBROSE ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds CHURCH HEALTH SERVICES INC
  • Who funds BEAVER DAM SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds RAWHIDE INC
  • Who funds PEOPLE AGAINST A VIOLENT ENVIRONMENT IN
  • Who funds The World Orphan Fund Inc
  • Who funds CENTRAL WISCONSIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds CHARIS CLASSICAL ACADEMY INCORPORATED
  • Who funds YMCA OF DODGE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds The Gathering Source Inc
  • Who funds PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER OF DODGE COUNTY INC
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Peter J Seippel Foundation IncWI22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Peter J Seippel Foundation Inc · Duane and Kathleen Foulkes Foundation Inc · United Way of Dodge County Inc · Keller Family Charitable Trust · Beaver Dam Community Hospitals Foundation Inc · The Jack and Arlene Schumann Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nelson & Vera Hicks Charitable Fdn funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nelson & Vera Hicks Charitable Fdn?

    Find your warmest path to Nelson & Vera Hicks Charitable Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph