Skip to content

· Private foundation

Nelson and Belle Chan Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$14k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$160kReligion$12kFood & Nutrition$7kPhilanthropy$2kInternational$2kArts & Culture$1kAnimals$900Public Safety & Disaster$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
$1,400
Median grant
1
States reached
$57k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PUI CHING MIDDLE SCHOOL$14,193
Individual grant recipient$1,400
ALAMEDA FOOD BANK$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 15% of grant dollars ($28k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 85% that went abroad ($162k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $803) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Self Help for Elderly: $303 → 10%American Red Cross: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 85% of all-years giving ($162k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Hong Kong$162k · 10 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$180k · 8 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
11

Total granted

$180k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+138%

Still filing today

50%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionReligionArts & CultureInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK
    3× · 2017–2020 · $5k · revenue +87%
  • SO
    SHOWERS OF BLESSING EVANGELISTIC MINISTRY USA
    2× · 2019–2021 · $500 · revenue +19%
  • KI
    KQED INC
    2× · 2018–2021 · $329 · revenue +35%

Funded once

  • GG
    Greater Good
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • CB
    CHRISTIAN BROADCASTING NETWORK
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Second Harvest of Silicon Valley

To realize our vision of a hunger free community we will provide more food, healthy food and better access to food. we will leverage our own resources and also work with partners in the community.

Food & Nutrition
2
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
5
Food Bank for Monterey County

To distribute food to alleviate hunger, provide emergency food services during a natural disaster, and conduct educational awareness programs relating to hunger issues in monterey county.

Unclassified
6
Sacramento Food Bank & Family Services

Dedicated to assisting those in need by alleviating their immediate pain and problems and moving them toward self-sufficiency and financial independence.

—
7
Hawaii Foodbank Inc

Hawaii foodbank, inc. is a nonprofit organization established to collect, warehouse and distribute salvageable food to social agencies that feed the needy of hawaii. the company is a certified member of feeding america, a nonprofit…

Food & Nutrition
8
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
9
Kauai Food Bank Inc

The mission of the food bank is to educate, provide nutritious food for the hungry, and respond to emergencies.

Food & Nutrition
10
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
11
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
12
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alameda County Community Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PUI CHING MIDDLE SCHOOL: $159,573 · OtherPUI CHING MIDDLE SCHOOLWEST VALLEY CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE CHURCH: $9,370 · Other+10 more: $16,177 · Other+10 moreGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,981 · InternationalAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $1,000 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $500 · Food & NutritionAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 · Human ServicesSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $303 · Human ServicesSHOWERS OF BLESSING EVANGELISTIC MINISTRY USA: $500 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $60 · ReligionKQED INC: $329 · Arts & Culture
Other$185,120International$1,981Food & Nutrition$1,500Human Services$803Religion$560Arts & Culture$329

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $4,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $1,981 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOWERS OF BLESSING EVANGELISTIC MINISTRY USA: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $329 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY: $303 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Alameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SHOWERS OF BLESSING EVANGELISTIC MINISTRY USA ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds MAUI FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds SELF-HELP FOR THE ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nelson and Belle Chan Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nelson and Belle Chan Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nelson and Belle Chan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph