Skip to content

· Public charity

Nebraska Recycling Council

Education of and assistance with waste reduction, recycling, and pollution prevention opportunities.

$226k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Environment$147kPublic Benefit$127kRecreation & Sports$47kHuman Services$45kEmployment$44kArts & Culture$21kYouth Development$20kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $220k
$16,440
Median grant
1
States reached
$227k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SMART SOILS$25,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES$25,000
CITY OF OMAHA$23,100
HEARTLAND DISPOSAL$22,679
KEEP CASS COUNTY BEAUTIFUL$21,997
MIDDLE NIOBRARA NRD$20,000
LOUP CENTRAL LANDFILL$16,440
CITY OF BENKLEMAN$15,761
CURTIS MCCABE DBA MILLIRON$14,000
CITY OF NELIGH$13,559
OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS$11,339
KEEPING CHADRON BEAUTIFUL$11,180
WESTERN RESOURCES GROUP$3,302
SOUTHWEST PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,712
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PAPIO NURSERY VALLY: $20k → 6%WEEPING WATER: $5k → 6%CITY OF HARTINGTON: $25k → 8%LOUP CENTRAL LANDFILL: $16k → 8%MIDWEST SOILOGIX: $16k → 10%WINE BEER AND SPIRITS: $7k → 11%VILLAGE OF STAPLETON: $10k → 11%WESTERN RESOURCES GROUP: $15k → 11%HEARTLAND DISPOSAL: $23k → 12%CITY OF TEKAMAH: $24k → 12%SOUTHWEST PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 12%MIDDLE NIOBRARA NRD: $20k → 12%CITY OF NELIGH: $14k → 12%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES: $25k → 12%CURTIS MCCABE DBA MILLIRON: $14k → 13%SMART SOILS: $25k → 13%CITY OF BENKLEMAN: $16k → 13%KEEPING CHADRON BEAUTIFUL: $11k → 16%KEEP CASS COUNTY BEAUTIFUL: $22k → 6%WESTERN RESOURCES GROUP: $3k → 11%FIRSTAR FIBER: $18k → 12%PINNANCLE BANK ARENA: $22k → 13%CITY OF BENKLEM: $16k → 13%KEEPING CHADRON BEAUTIFUL: $10k → 16%CITY OF OMAHA: $23k → 12%NEBRASKA STATE FAIR 1868 FOUNDATION: $21k → 13%UNDER THE SINK- CITY OF OMAHA: $6k → 12%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LINCOLN: $6k → 13%OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $11k → 12%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN NEBRASKA: $25k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$100k · 4 repeat orgs$391k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
13

Total granted

$100k
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+89%

Still filing today

50%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $173k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
EmploymentEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CITY OF BENKLEMAN
    2× · 2024–2025 · $31k
  • CO
    CITY OF OMAHA - DEPARTMENT OF PARKS RECREATION AND PUBLIC PROPERTY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $29k
  • KC
    KEEP CHADRON BEAUTIFUL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $22k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CS
    CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -13%
  • CO
    CITY OF HARTINGTON
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • CO
    CITY OF TEKAMAH
    one grant, 2024 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
2
Goodwill Industries Foundation of Greater Nebraska Inc

To raise the funds necessary to support the services provided by goodwill industries of greater nebraska, inc.

—
3
Goodwill Industries of Central Iowa

To improve the quality of life for all individuals by providing skills training and helping people find jobs.

Employment
4
Goodwill Retail Services Inc

Goodwill retail services, inc. ("goodwill retail") is a nonstock, not-for-profit wisconsin corporation, whose sole member is goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill"), a wisconsin nonstock, not-for-profit corporation…

Employment
5
Goodwill Industries of Northeast Indiana Inc

Goodwill industries of northeast indiana, inc. empowers and prepares people for independence through training, personal growth and work.

Employment
6
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
—
7
Goodwill Industries of Nc Pa Inc

Goodwill industries of n.c. pa, inc. provides social and vocational rehabilitation, training, and educational programs for people with disabilities and other disadvantaging conditions through the operation of retail stores, job centers,…

—
8
Mindful Waste
—
9
Goodwill Industries of Northern Wisconsin & Upper Michigan Inc

To provide opportunities for vocational training, job placement assistance, and the developement of independent living skills for people with disabilities or other barriers to employment.

Employment
10
Nebraska Grazing Lands Coalition

Protect and restore ecological balance to nebraska grasslands.

Community Improvement
11
Goodwill Industries Inc Serving Southeast Nebraska Inc

Willing workers employed and community resources maximized.

Employment
12
First West Thrift Store

To provide the community with a low cost place to shop for everyday needs, such as clothing, household goods & furniture in a loving christian environment to help people who are in difficult situations start over again, place for people to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goodwill Industries of Greater Nebraska Inc; the most unlike its peers is Western Resources Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF BENKLEMAN: $31,319 · OtherCITY OF BENKLEMANCITY OF OMAHA - DEPARTMENT OF PARKS RECREATION AND PUBLIC PROPERTY: $29,099 · OtherCITY OF OMAHA - DEPARTMENT OF PARKS RECREATION AND PUBLIC PROPERTYCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $25,000 · OtherCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICESCITY OF HARTINGTON: $25,000 · OtherCITY OF HARTINGTONSMART SOILS: $25,000 · OtherSMART SOILSCITY OF TEKAMAH: $23,910 · OtherCITY OF TEKAMAHHEARTLAND DISPOSAL: $22,679 · OtherHEARTLAND DISPOSALCITY OF LINCOLN NEBRASKA: $21,857 · OtherCITY OF LINCOLN NEBRASKAKEEP CHADRON BEAUTIFUL: $21,580 · OtherKEEP CHADRON BEAUTIFULPAPIO NURSERY VALLY: $20,000 · OtherMIDDLE NIOBRARA NRD: $20,000 · OtherFIRSTAR FIBER INC: $18,375 · OtherLOUP CENTRAL LANDFILL: $16,440 · OtherMIDWEST SOILOGIX: $15,960 · OtherCURTIS MCCABE DBA MILLIRON: $14,000 · OtherCITY OF NELIGH: $13,559 · Other+5 more: $36,086 · Other+5 moreGOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC: $25,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL I…GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INC: $18,680 · EmploymentGOODWILL I…KEEP CASS COUNTY BEAUTIFUL: $21,997 · EnvironmentKEEP CASS…WESTERN RESOURCES GROUP INC: $18,198 · EnvironmentWESTERN R…NEBRASKA STATE FAIR 1868 FOUNDATION: $21,360 · Recreation & SportsLINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,773 · Housing & Shelter
Other$379,864Employment$43,680Environment$40,195Recreation & Sports$21,360Housing & Shelter$5,773

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKEEP CASS COUNTY BEAUTIFUL: $21,997 over 1y, 12% of budgetKEEP CHADRON BEAUTIFUL: $21,580 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetNEBRASKA STATE FAIR 1868 FOUNDATION: $21,360 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INC: $18,680 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWESTERN RESOURCES GROUP INC: $18,198 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetLINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,773 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds KEEP CASS COUNTY BEAUTIFUL ↗
  • Who funds KEEP CHADRON BEAUTIFUL ↗
  • Who funds NEBRASKA STATE FAIR 1868 FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN RESOURCES GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Nebraska Recycling Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Nebraska Recycling Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nebraska Recycling Council?

    Find your warmest path to Nebraska Recycling Council through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Nebraska Recycling Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph