Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Nebraska Recycling Council

Education of and assistance with waste reduction, recycling, and pollution prevention opportunities.

$226k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20242025.

Environment$147kPublic Benefit$127kRecreation & Sports$47kHuman Services$45kEmployment$44kArts & Culture$21kYouth Development$20kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $220k
$16,440
Median grant
1
States reached
$227k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SMART SOILS$25,000
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES$25,000
CITY OF OMAHA$23,100
HEARTLAND DISPOSAL$22,679
KEEP CASS COUNTY BEAUTIFUL$21,997
MIDDLE NIOBRARA NRD$20,000
LOUP CENTRAL LANDFILL$16,440
CITY OF BENKLEMAN$15,761
CURTIS MCCABE DBA MILLIRON$14,000
CITY OF NELIGH$13,559
OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS$11,339
KEEPING CHADRON BEAUTIFUL$11,180
WESTERN RESOURCES GROUP$3,302
SOUTHWEST PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,712
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PAPIO NURSERY VALLY: $20k → 6%WEEPING WATER: $5k → 6%CITY OF HARTINGTON: $25k → 8%LOUP CENTRAL LANDFILL: $16k → 8%MIDWEST SOILOGIX: $16k → 10%WINE BEER AND SPIRITS: $7k → 11%VILLAGE OF STAPLETON: $10k → 11%WESTERN RESOURCES GROUP: $15k → 11%HEARTLAND DISPOSAL: $23k → 12%CITY OF TEKAMAH: $24k → 12%SOUTHWEST PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $3k → 12%MIDDLE NIOBRARA NRD: $20k → 12%CITY OF NELIGH: $14k → 12%GOODWILL INDUSTRIES: $25k → 12%CURTIS MCCABE DBA MILLIRON: $14k → 13%SMART SOILS: $25k → 13%CITY OF BENKLEMAN: $16k → 13%KEEPING CHADRON BEAUTIFUL: $11k → 16%KEEP CASS COUNTY BEAUTIFUL: $22k → 6%WESTERN RESOURCES GROUP: $3k → 11%FIRSTAR FIBER: $18k → 12%PINNANCLE BANK ARENA: $22k → 13%CITY OF BENKLEM: $16k → 13%KEEPING CHADRON BEAUTIFUL: $10k → 16%CITY OF OMAHA: $23k → 12%NEBRASKA STATE FAIR 1868 FOUNDATION: $21k → 13%UNDER THE SINK- CITY OF OMAHA: $6k → 12%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF LINCOLN: $6k → 13%OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $11k → 12%CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN NEBRASKA: $25k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$100k · 4 repeat orgs$391k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
13

Total granted

$100k
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+89%

Still filing today

50%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $173k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
EmploymentEnvironmentRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    CITY OF BENKLEMAN
    2× · 2024–2025 · $31k
  • CO
    CITY OF OMAHA - DEPARTMENT OF PARKS RECREATION AND PUBLIC PROPERTY
    2× · 2024–2025 · $29k
  • KC
    KEEP CHADRON BEAUTIFUL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $22k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF HARTINGTON
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • CS
    CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES
    one grant, 2024 · $25k · revenue -13%
  • CO
    CITY OF TEKAMAH
    one grant, 2024 · $24k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
2
Goodwill Industries Foundation of Greater Nebraska Inc

To raise the funds necessary to support the services provided by goodwill industries of greater nebraska, inc.

3
Goodwill Industries of Central Iowa

To improve the quality of life for all individuals by providing skills training and helping people find jobs.

Employment
4
Goodwill Retail Services Inc

Goodwill retail services, inc. ("goodwill retail") is a nonstock, not-for-profit wisconsin corporation, whose sole member is goodwill industries of southeastern wisconsin, inc. ("goodwill"), a wisconsin nonstock, not-for-profit corporation…

Employment
5
Goodwill Industries of Northeast Indiana Inc

Goodwill industries of northeast indiana, inc. empowers and prepares people for independence through training, personal growth and work.

Employment
6
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
7
Goodwill Industries of Nc Pa Inc

Goodwill industries of n.c. pa, inc. provides social and vocational rehabilitation, training, and educational programs for people with disabilities and other disadvantaging conditions through the operation of retail stores, job centers,…

8
Mindful Waste
9
Goodwill Industries of Northern Wisconsin & Upper Michigan Inc

To provide opportunities for vocational training, job placement assistance, and the developement of independent living skills for people with disabilities or other barriers to employment.

Employment
10
Nebraska Grazing Lands Coalition

Protect and restore ecological balance to nebraska grasslands.

Community Improvement
11
Goodwill Industries Inc Serving Southeast Nebraska Inc

Willing workers employed and community resources maximized.

Employment
12
First West Thrift Store

To provide the community with a low cost place to shop for everyday needs, such as clothing, household goods & furniture in a loving christian environment to help people who are in difficult situations start over again, place for people to…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Goodwill Industries of Greater Nebraska Inc and the most unlike its peers is Western Resources Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF BENKLEMAN — $31,319 · OtherCITY OF BENKLEMANCITY OF OMAHA - DEPARTMENT OF PARKS RECREATION AND PUBLIC PROPERTY — $29,099 · OtherCITY OF OMAHA - DEPARTMENT OF PARKS RECREATION AND PUBLIC PROPERTYCITY OF HARTINGTON — $25,000 · OtherCITY OF HARTINGTONCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES — $25,000 · OtherCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICESSMART SOILS — $25,000 · OtherSMART SOILSCITY OF TEKAMAH — $23,910 · OtherCITY OF TEKAMAHHEARTLAND DISPOSAL — $22,679 · OtherHEARTLAND DISPOSALCITY OF LINCOLN NEBRASKA — $21,857 · OtherCITY OF LINCOLN NEBRASKAKEEP CHADRON BEAUTIFUL — $21,580 · OtherKEEP CHADRON BEAUTIFULMIDDLE NIOBRARA NRD — $20,000 · OtherPAPIO NURSERY VALLY — $20,000 · OtherFIRSTAR FIBER INC — $18,375 · OtherLOUP CENTRAL LANDFILL — $16,440 · OtherMIDWEST SOILOGIX — $15,960 · OtherCURTIS MCCABE DBA MILLIRON — $14,000 · OtherCITY OF NELIGH — $13,559 · Other+5 more — $36,086 · Other+5 moreGOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC — $25,000 · EmploymentGOODWILL I…GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INC — $18,680 · EmploymentGOODWILL I…KEEP CASS COUNTY BEAUTIFUL — $21,997 · EnvironmentKEEP CASS…WESTERN RESOURCES GROUP INC — $18,198 · EnvironmentWESTERN R…NEBRASKA STATE FAIR 1868 FOUNDATION — $21,360 · Recreation & SportsLINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $5,773 · Housing & Shelter
Other$379,864Employment$43,680Environment$40,195Recreation & Sports$21,360Housing & Shelter$5,773

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKEEP CASS COUNTY BEAUTIFUL — $21,997 over 1y, 12% of budgetKEEP CHADRON BEAUTIFUL — $21,580 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetNEBRASKA STATE FAIR 1868 FOUNDATION — $21,360 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INC — $18,680 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWESTERN RESOURCES GROUP INC — $18,198 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetLINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $5,773 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATHOLIC SOCIAL SERVICES
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC
  • Who funds KEEP CASS COUNTY BEAUTIFUL
  • Who funds KEEP CHADRON BEAUTIFUL
  • Who funds NEBRASKA STATE FAIR 1868 FOUNDATION
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF GREATER NEBRASKA INC
  • Who funds WESTERN RESOURCES GROUP INC
  • Who funds LINCOLNLANCASTER COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA0.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Nebraska Recycling Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Nebraska Recycling Council?

    Find your warmest path to Nebraska Recycling Council through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph