Skip to content
Ndh Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Ndh Foundation

The mission of NDH FOUNDATION is to raise funds, reinvest and administer these funds and make distributions to northern dutchess hospital and other not-for-profit affiliates.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.7M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$9.3M
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $268k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.7M
$173,164
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHERN DUTCHESS HOSPITAL$1,692,112
NUVANCE HEALTH MEDICAL PRACTICE PC$173,164
NUVANCE HEALTH$94,435
NORTHERN DUTCHESS RESIDENTIAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY INC$10,939
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Northern Dutchess Hospital: $2.9M → 9%Vassar Health Connecticut Inc: $1.4M → 9%DANBURY HOSPITAL: $27k → 9%Northern Dutchess Hospital: $2.6M → 9%VASSAR HEALTH CONNECTICUT INC: $201k → 9%Danbury Hospital: $17k → 9%NORTHERN DUTCHESS HOSPITAL: $1.7M → 9%VASSAR HEALTH CONNECTICUT INC: $11k → 9%Norwalk Hospital Association: $17k → 9%NORTHERN DUTCHESS HOSPITAL: $490k → 9%NORTHERN DUTCHESS HOSPITAL: $379k → 9%NORTHERN DUTCHESS HOSPITAL: $338k → 9%NORTHERN DUTCHESS RESIDENTIAL HEALTHCARE FACILITY: $110k → 9%Northern Dutchess Residential Healthcare Facility Inc: $110k → 9%NORTHERN DUTCHESS RESIDENTIAL HEALTH CARE FACILITY INC: $11k → 9%HEALTH QUEST SYSTEMS INC: $461k → 9%NUVANCE HEALTH MEDICAL PRACTICE PC: $173k → 9%NUVANCE HEALTH: $94k → 9%NUVANCE HEALTH MEDICAL PRACTICE PC: $84k → 9%NUVANCE HEALTH: $60k → 9%Nuvance Health: $34k → 9%Vassar Brothers Medical Center: $17k → 9%Nuvance Health Medical Practice PC: $9k → 9%Health Quest Systems Inc: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 7 repeat orgs$33k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$11M
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+2%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    Northern Dutchess Hospital
    6× · 2018–2025 · $8.5M · revenue +59%
  • VH
    Vassar Health Connecticut Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.6M · revenue +16%
  • NH
    Nuvance Health Medical Practice PC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $266k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • TN
    The Norwalk Hospital Association
    one grant, 2024 · $17k · revenue +1%
  • VB
    Vassar Brothers Medical Center
    one grant, 2024 · $17k · revenue +2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Putnam Hospital Center

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
2
Hartford Hospital

To improve the health and healing of the people and communities we serve.

Health
3
Lehigh Valley Hospital-Hazleton

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and clinical research.

Health
4
Rex Hospital Inc

To improve the health and well-being of north carolinians and others whom we serve. we accomplish this by providing leadership and excellence in the interrelated areas of patient care, education, and research.

Health
5
John Muir Health

The mission of john muir is to improve the health of the communities we serve with quality and compassion.

Health
6
Yale New Haven Hospital

The mission of ynhh is to provide innovative and excellent patient care, teaching, research, and service to the communities it serves.

Health
7
Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center

Fort Sanders Regional Medical Center provides quality healthcare, in alignment with Covenant Health's mission to serve the community by improving the quality of life through better health, regardless of a patient's ability to pay.

Health
8
Holland Community Hospital

To continuously improve the health of the communities we serve in the spirit of hope, compassion, respect and dignity.

Health
9
Holy Redeemer Health System

As a catholic health system, rooted in the tradition of the sisters of the holy redeemer, we care, comfort and heal, following the example of jesus, proclaiming the hope god offers in the midst of human struggle.

Health
10
Tidalhealth Nanticoke Inc

Improve the health of the communities we serve.

Health
11
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Western Connecticut Health Network Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Norwalk Hospital Association; the most unlike its peers is Vassar Brothers Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Northern Dutchess Hospital: $8,453,828 · HealthNorthern Dutchess HospitalVassar Health Connecticut Inc: $1,630,724 · HealthVassar Health Connecticut Inc+6 more: $762,064 · Health+6 moreHealth Quest Systems Inc: $468,383 · Other
Health$10,846,616Other$468,383

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNorthern Dutchess Hospital: $8,453,828 over 6y, 1.6% of budgetVassar Health Connecticut Inc: $1,630,724 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetHealth Quest Systems Inc: $468,383 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetNuvance Health Medical Practice PC: $266,014 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNorthern Dutchess Residential Healthcare FAC: $231,209 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetNuvance Health: $188,102 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Danbury Hospital: $43,405 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Norwalk Hospital Association: $16,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVassar Brothers Medical Center: $16,667 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Danbury Hospital & Ne…Vassar Brothers Hospi…Norwalk Hospital Foun…
Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation IncCT22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc · Vassar Brothers Hospital Foundation · Norwalk Hospital Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ndh Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ndh Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Danbury Hospital: 1% of income from government
  • The Norwalk Hospital Association: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ndh’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home