Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Vassar Brothers Hospital Foundation

The mission of Vassar Brothers Hospital Foundation is to raise funds, reinvest and administer these funds and make distriubtions to vassar brothers medical center and other not-for-profit vassar brothers medical center affiliates.

$3.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3.3M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$27M
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $185k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.6M
$86,806
Median grant
2
States reached
$53M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Vassar Brothers Medical Center$3,318,323
Nuvance Health$255,577
Vassar Health Connecticut Inc$98,536
Western Connecticut Health Network Inc$86,806
Health Quest Systems Inc$43,281
Nuvance Health Medical Practice PC$37,027
Northern Dutchess Hospital$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Northern Dutchess Hospital: $25k → 9%Vassar Health Connecticut Inc: $99k → 9%Western Connecticut Health Network Inc: $87k → 9%VASSAR BROTHERS MEDICAL CENTER: $6.6M → 9%DANBURY HOSPITAL: $19k → 9%VASSAR BROTHERS MEDICAL CENTER: $5.8M → 9%VASSAR BROTHERS MEDICAL CENTER: $5.4M → 9%Vassar Brothers Medical Center: $3.8M → 9%Vassar Brothers Medical Center: $3.3M → 9%NUVANCE HEALTH: $1.2M → 9%VASSAR BROTHERS MEDICAL CENTER: $331k → 9%Nuvance Health: $256k → 9%Nuvance Health: $105k → 9%Health Quest Systems Inc: $43k → 9%Nuvance Health Medical Practice PC: $37k → 9%Nuvance Health Medical Practice PC: $35k → 9%HEALTH QUEST SYSTEMS INC: $12k → 9%NUVANCE HEALTH MEDICAL PRACTICE PC: $6k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$27M · 4 repeat orgs$229k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +23% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
1

Total granted

$27M
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VB
    Vassar Brothers Medical Center
    6× · 2018–2024 · $25M · revenue +34%
  • NH
    Nuvance Health
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +23%
  • NH
    Nuvance Health Medical Practice PC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $78k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • TD
    The Danbury Hospital
    one grant, 2021 · $19k · revenue +13%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nuvance Health Medical Practice Ct Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

2
Putnam Hospital Center

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care

Health
3
Northern Dutchess Residential Healthcare Fac

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
4
The Norwalk Hospital Association

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

Health
5
Ndh Foundation

The mission of ndh foundation is to raise funds, reinvest and administer these funds and make distriubtions to northern dutchess hospital and other not-for-profit affiliates.

Health
6
Western Connecticut Health Network Affiliates Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

7
Western Connecticut Home Care Inc

Improve the health of every person in our community through the efficient delivery of excellent, innovative and compassionate care.

8
Vassar Brothers Hospital Foundation

The mission of vassar brothers hospital foundation is to raise funds, reinvest and administer these funds and make distriubtions to vassar brothers medical center and other not-for-profit vassar brothers medical center affiliates.

Health
9
Putnam Hospital Center Foundation Inc

The mission of putnam hospital center foundation is to raise funds, reinvest and administer these funds and make distributions to putnam hospital and other not-for-profit affiliates.

Health
10
Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc

To raise funds, reinvest and administer these funds and make distributions to danbury and new milford hospitals and other not-for profit health care affiliates.

Health
11
Norwalk Hospital Foundation

The mission of norwalk hospital foundation is to raise funds, reinvest and administer these funds and make distributions to norwalk hospital and other not-for-profit norwalk hospital affiliates.

Health
12
Presbyterian Medical Care Corp

Mission novant health exists to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time. vision we, the novant health team, will deliver the most remarkable patient experience, in every dimension, every time. values -compassion: we…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Health Quest Systems Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Danbury Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Vassar Brothers Medical Center — $25,193,064 · HealthVassar Brothers Medical CenterNuvance Health — $1,531,893 · HealthNuvance Health+4 more — $220,860 · HealthWestern Connecticut Health Network Inc — $86,806 · OtherHealth Quest Systems Inc — $55,345 · Other
Health$26,945,817Other$142,151

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVassar Brothers Medical Center — $25,193,064 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetNuvance Health — $1,531,893 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVassar Health Connecticut Inc — $98,536 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWestern Connecticut Health Network Inc — $86,806 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNuvance Health Medical Practice PC — $78,225 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHealth Quest Systems Inc — $55,345 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNorthern Dutchess Hospital — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Danbury Hospital — $19,099 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation IncCT22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Danbury Hospital & New Milford Hospital Foundation Inc · NDH Foundation · Norwalk Hospital Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Vassar Brothers Hospital Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • The Danbury Hospital1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY2024

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph