Skip to content

· Private foundation

NCMA Education Research Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$634kHousing & Shelter$351kMembership Benefit$225kArts & Culture$182kCommunity Improvement$144kScience & Tech$90kEmployment$73kPublic Safety & Disaster$46kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $38k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association$12,500
Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association$12,430
Arizona Masonry Council$7,500
Bowling Green State University$5,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 52% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%Arizona Masonry Council: $21k → 11%ECE ERDOGMUS SKOURUP: $90k → 12%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $15k → 16%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $67k → 14%University of Houston Cullen College of Engineering: $20k → 16%Clemson University School of Architecture: $15k → 16%FLORIDA CONCRETE MASONRY EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL: $60k → 13%3DIQ INC: $86k → 5%MISSOURI UNIVERSITY S&T: $110k → 16%SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $20k → 21%TENNESSEE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY: $44k → 19%North Carolina State University School of Architecture: $17k → 8%THE MASONRY SOCIETY: $19k → 12%THE MASONRY SOCIETY: $15k → 6%JASON YANA STUDIOS: $10k → 8%NATIONAL CONCRETE MASONRY ASSOCIATION: $30k → 6%WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $40k → 18%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $13k → 14%CONCRETE COALITION OF FLORIDA: $20k → 13%3DIQ INC: $86k → 5%UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI: $15k → 16%THE MASONRY SOCIETY: $10k → 6%NATIONAL CONCRETE MASONRY ASSOCIATION: $25k → 6%MASONRY ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA: $16k → 13%NATIONAL CONCRETE MASONRY ASSOCIATION: $25k → 6%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association fka ICPI-NCMA: $23k → 6%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%NCMA UNIT DESIGN COMPETITION: $20k → 6%PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 16%NCMA - UNIT DESIGN COMPETITION 2019: $20k → 6%Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association fka ICPI-NCMA: $20k → 6%NATIONAL CONCRETE MASONRY ASSOCIATION: $20k → 6%NCMA - FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADIMISTRATION: $18k → 6%NATIONAL CONCRETE MASONRY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 6%Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association: $13k → 6%National Concrete Masonry Association: $13k → 6%NCMA - DEVELOPMENT & DELIVERY OF CONCRETE MASONRY: $13k → 6%Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association fka ICPI-NCMA: $13k → 6%Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association: $13k → 6%Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association: $13k → 6%Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association: $12k → 6%NATIONAL CONCRETE MASONRY ASSOCIATION: $12k → 6%Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association: $11k → 6%Concrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association: $10k → 6%NCMA - ENERGY MODELING RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 6%National Concrete Masonry Association: $9k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
IL
NY
WY
SD
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of NCMA Education Research Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

NCMA Education Research Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.5% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$868k · 19 repeat orgs$945k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
52

Total granted

$868k
$920k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
0%

Still filing today

21%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2018–2019 · $80k · revenue +40%
  • CM
    Concrete Masonry and Hardscape Association
    3× · 2023–2025 · $76k · revenue +21%
  • AM
    ARIZONA MASONRY COUNCIL
    2× · 2023–2025 · $29k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • MU
    MISSOURI UNIVERSITY S&T
    one grant, 2017 · $110k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $90k
  • EI
    ENSOLTECH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $70k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Masonry Construction Industry Improvement Program

To improve, promote and service the masonry construction industry in hawaii.

—
2
The Minnesota Concrete & Masonry Contractors Assoc

To promote and encourage higher standards in the concrete and masonry industry and to promote the mutual advancement and welfare of the members of the industry by engaging in education and programs on an industry-wide basis as to maintain…

—
3
Mason Contractors Association of America

To advance the masonry industry through quality workmanship, education, and training to mason contractors.

—
4
Masonry Institute of Iowa

To provide service, leadership, education, and promotion in support of its members and the masonry field.

—
5
Natural Stone Institute

The natural stone institute's mission statement is: to lead, support, and promote a unified natural stone industry through authoritive information, education, standards, and advocacy. additionally, its core values include leadership,…

—
6
Masonry Institute of Michigan Inc

The masonry institute of michigan inc. is dedicated to the promotion and advancement of the masonry industry. the institute provides information to the industry and public, indiscriminately. the institute's goal is to promote quality…

—
7
Careers in Construction Sw Washington
Recreation & Sports
8
Maine School of Masonry

School based on masonry skills

—
9
American Cement Association

Improve and expand the uses of cement and concrete which, by doing so, improves the quality of construction which contributes to a better environment. in practice, this mandate means well-rounded programs of market development, education,…

—
10
Metal Building Manufacturers Association

To promote the uses of metal buildings, deal with technical and trade promotional problems pertinent to the industry, publish information of benefit to the industry, and to promote the maintenance of standard specifications.

—
11
National Maintenance Agreement Labor- Management Policy Committee

The national maintenance agreements policy committee negotiates and administers the national maintenance agreements, a series of collective bargaining agreements utilized by more than 1,700 industrial contractors who employ members of…

—
12
Rocky Mountain Mechanical Contractors Association

Rocky Mountain MCA serves the unique needs of mechanical, plumbing and HVACR trade associations and contractor companies in Colorado. The Rocky Mountain MCA team has more than 25 years of combined leadership in managing and engaging…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Concrete Masonry Association; the most unlike its peers is St Louis University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

National Concrete Masonry Association: $198,722 · OtherNational Concrete Masonry Association3DIQ INC: $172,000 · Other3DIQ INCMISSOURI UNIVERSITY S&T: $109,532 · OtherMISSOURI UNIVERSITY S&TIndividual grant recipient: $89,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · OtherConcrete Masonry and Hardscape Association: $75,935 · OtherENSOLTECH INC: $70,000 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY: $65,942 · OtherFLORIDA CONCRETE MASONRY EDUCATIONAL COUNCIL: $60,000 · OtherConcrete Masonry & Hardscapes Association fka ICPI-NCMA: $58,398 · Other+61 more: $673,431 · Other+61 moreSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $80,457 · EducationTHE MASONRY SOCIETY: $26,500 · EducationST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $19,769 · Education+1 more: $4,000 · EducationARIZONA MASONRY COUNCIL: $28,500 · Community Improvement
Other$1,653,760Education$130,726Community Improvement$28,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNational Concrete Masonry Association: $198,722 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $80,457 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetConcrete Masonry and Hardscape Association: $75,935 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetARIZONA MASONRY COUNCIL: $28,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE MASONRY SOCIETY: $26,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMASONRY ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA INC: $22,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $19,769 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST CONCRETE MASONRY ASSOCIATION: $4,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MASONRY FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA MASONRY CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION INC: $3,875 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMASONRY INSTITUTE OF ST LOUIS: $1,925 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds National Concrete Masonry Association ↗
  • Who funds SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Concrete Masonry and Hardscape Association ↗
  • Who funds ARIZONA MASONRY COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds THE MASONRY SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MASONRY ASSOCIATION OF FLORIDA INC ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

The Masonry FoundationIL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Masonry Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization NCMA Education Research Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from NCMA Education Research Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on NCMA Education Research’s filings →

    More from the funding graph