Skip to content

· Public charity

Naturebridge

To connect young people to the wonder and science of the natural world, igniting self-discovery and inspiring stewardship of our planet.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
84
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$44k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$5.7MRecreation & Sports$517kEnvironment$217kYouth Development$7k
02FY2025 · 84 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 84 grants below total $832,310, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,181,680 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $349,370 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k53 grants · $378k
  • $10k–50k31 grants · $454k
$8,432
Median grant
5
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WOODS PROJECT GROUP$44,367
GRAHAM MIDDLE SCHOOL (MVWSD)$24,990
JOHN BARRETT MIDDLE SCHOOL$23,955
ENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL - GARDENA$19,814
INGENUITY PREP$19,480
ENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL - LAWNDALE$18,824
BRIGHTWOOD EDUCATION CAMPUS$16,970
MLK ELEMENTARY$14,548
CALISTOGA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$14,477
CAROLINE WENZEL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (SCUSD)$14,400
SCHURR HIGH SCHOOL$14,377
TWO RIVERS PCS - YOUNG ELEMENTARY$13,680
WSU GEAR UP - EARLY OUTREACH PROGRAM$12,903
MARIPOSA AND EL PORTAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS (MCUSD)$12,690
MISSION PREPARATORY SCHOOL$12,671
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%B F DAY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $5k → 9%EAST PALO ALTO FAMILY YMCA: $6k → 8%EAST PALO ALTO FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 8%PARA LOS NINOS MIDDLE SCHOOL: $9k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $11k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $9k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
OR
NV
WY
CA
VA
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 90 repeat orgs$596k to everyone else

90 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2025, 47 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

90
50

Total granted

$5.7M
$472k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+35%

Still filing today

36%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOLS
    7× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +124%
  • TW
    THE WOODS PROJECT
    7× · 2017–2025 · $186k · revenue +45%
  • TR
    TWO RIVERS PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $134k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • LU
    Lompoc Unified School Dist
    one grant, 2023 · $58k
  • MULTIPLIERgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +266%
  • LD
    LEONARDO DA VINCI PARENT TEACHER COUNCIL
    one grant, 2020 · $23k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pacific View Charter School

To focus on the success of each student & involve parents in the education of their children. the school is comitted to providing appropriate physical space, materials, qualified personnel, and staff development in order to guide the…

Education
2
Ararat Charter School

Ararat charter is committed to educating students to their full potential in an environment that actively engages students in relevant programs and expected school wide learning results and standards.

Education
3
Elite Public Schools

To ensure students reach their fullest potential through access to learning spaces that honor and celebrate students' rich cultural heritage and challenge them with rigorous and relevant learning experiences designed to make them active…

Education
4
Pacific Coast Academy

Provide a high standard of education to students through comprehensive curriculum supported by energetic, dynamic, and caring teachers.

Education
5
Cesar Chavez Public Charter School for Public Policy

To prepare students to succeed in competitive colleges and to empower them to use public policy to create a more just, free, and equal world.

Education
6
Ingenuity Prep

Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.

Education
7
Bridges Charter School

Our mission is to educate the whole child using a combination of innovative curriculum and instruction along with social/emotional education embedded in the program. students will be enabled to reach their innate intellectual, creative,…

Education
8
Mark Day School

Innovative and full of heart, mark day school nurtures each child to pursue their curiosity, think critically, embrace challenge with courage and joy, and work in partnership with others to build more caring and inclusive communities.

—
9
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
10
Larchmont Schools

The mission of larchmont charter school is to provide a socio-economically, culturally and racially diverse community of students with an exceptional public education. we foster creativity and academic excellence; our students learn with…

Education
11
Pacific Community Charter School

To provide a rigorous interdisciplinary curriculum which prepares students to enter higher education and occupations in their communities with an understanding of their geographic and historical roots and the goals toward which they can…

Education
12
Bullis-Purissima Elementary School

The full mission statement is presented on schedule o.bullis charter school (bcs) offers a collaborative, experiential learning environment that emphasizes individual student growth. as a model of educational innovation, bcs inspires…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connect Community Charter School; the most unlike its peers is Paso Verde School Pta. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

71 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 71 of the 155 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/71
Grantees still filing
45/71
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL MALL AND MEMORIAL PARKS: $603,204 · OtherNATIONAL MALL AND MEMORIAL PARKSDC PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $546,351 · OtherDC PUBLIC SCHOOLSMountain View Whisman School: $224,201 · OtherMARIPOSA AND EL PORTAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS: $165,984 · OtherPORT ANGELES SCHOOL DISTRICT: $165,843 · Other+95 more: $2,801,718 · Other+95 moreENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOLS: $199,660 · EducationENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOLSTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $192,310 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE …TWO RIVERS PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $134,301 · EducationTWO RIVERS PUBLIC CHARTER SCH…BDC A PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $131,090 · EducationBDC A PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL I…KIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS: $91,260 · EducationKIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLSJOHN F KENNEDY MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPEDITIONARY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $79,366 · EducationDC BILINGUAL PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $76,851 · EducationSpokane International Academy: $66,936 · EducationKIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS: $65,320 · EducationWASHINGTON YU YING PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $63,795 · Education+35 more: $557,678 · Education+35 moreTHE WOODS PROJECT: $186,006 · Recreation & SportsNEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $28,331 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $11,434 · Human ServicesPARA LOS NINOS: $8,790 · Human ServicesBF DAY PTSA KING COUNTY 61585: $5,473 · Human ServicesMULTIPLIER: $25,085 · EnvironmentNATIONAL PARKS FRIENDS ALLIANCE: $6,000 · EnvironmentROSIE THE RIVETER TRUST: $18,537 · Arts & CultureTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA: $6,828 · Youth DevelopmentWEST FRESNO HEALTH CARE COALITION DBA WEST FRESNO FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $5,894 · Health
Other$4,507,301Education$1,658,567Recreation & Sports$186,006Human Services$54,028Environment$31,085Arts & Culture$18,537Youth Development$6,828Health$5,894

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOLS: $199,660 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $192,310 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOODS PROJECT: $186,006 over 7y, 4.2% of budgetTWO RIVERS PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $134,301 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBDC A PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $131,090 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetKIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS: $91,260 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJOHN F KENNEDY MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPEDITIONARY EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $79,366 over 6y, 15% of budgetDC BILINGUAL PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $76,851 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSpokane International Academy: $66,936 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetKIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS: $65,320 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON YU YING PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $63,795 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPACOIMA CHARTER SCHOOL: $51,121 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $49,020 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCALIBER PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $39,152 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetACHIEVEMENT PREPARATORY ACADEMY PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $33,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEXTERA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $28,566 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $28,331 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetDemocracy Prep Congress Heights Public Charter School: $27,640 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMULTIPLIER: $25,085 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILLOW PARENTS AND FACULTY ASSOCIATION: $22,968 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetLEONARDO DA VINCI PARENT TEACHER COUNCIL: $22,860 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetEXCEL ACADEMY PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $21,875 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAlliance for Education: $21,839 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND: $20,733 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE JUDY IVIE BURTON TECHNOLOGY ACADEMY HIGH SCHOOL: $20,418 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF LACES: $20,306 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetROSIE THE RIVETER TRUST: $18,537 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetPTA CA CONGRESS OF PARENTS-SIERRA OAKS SCHOOL PTA: $18,514 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetBRIDGES PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $18,315 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF REED INC: $17,024 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetLOUISA BOREN STEM K-8 PTA 615183: $15,389 over 2y, 15% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE IHP: $13,585 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetHOPE COMMUNITY PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL: $13,540 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDC PREPARATORY ACADEMY: $12,825 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION PREPARATORY INC: $12,671 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL: $12,614 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGATEWAY COMMUNITY CHARTERS: $12,556 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $12,303 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF SILICON VALLEY: $11,434 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENDEAVOR COLLEGE PREPARATORY CHARTER SCHOOL: $8,837 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS: $8,790 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRIGHT STAR SCHOOLS: $8,210 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCREDO HIGH SCHOOL: $7,962 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LANGUAGE ACADEMY OF SACRAMENTO: $7,524 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALLIANCE JACK H SKIRBALL MIDDLE SCHOOL: $7,264 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA: $6,828 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGreen Dot Public Schools: $6,717 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBISHOPS PEAK PTA: $6,707 over 1y, 5.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE WOODS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds TWO RIVERS PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BDC A PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds KIPP BAY AREA SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds JOHN F KENNEDY MIDDLE SCHOOL EXPEDITIONARY EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DC BILINGUAL PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Spokane International Academy ↗
  • Who funds KIPP DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON YU YING PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PACOIMA CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST)NH33× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: For Inspiration and Recognition of Science and Technology (FIRST) · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Round It Up America Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · The Family Giving Tree · Intrepid Philanthropy Foundation · Silicon Schools Fund Inc · Charter Fund Inc D/B/A Charter School Growth Fund · Share Our Strength · Education Forward DC · Action for Healthy Kids

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Naturebridge funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Naturebridge. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 155 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Naturebridge’s filings →

    More from the funding graph