Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

National Tuberous Sclerosis Association

To improve quality of life for everyone affected by tuberous sclerosis complex by catalyzing new treatments, driving research toward a cure and expanding access to lifelong support.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$3.5MScience & Tech$1.6MHuman Services$150kEducation$114k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $701,695 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,040,281 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $338,586 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $644k
$56,250
Median grant
6
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS$150,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$100,579
EMORY UNIVERSITY$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS$75,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$75,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS$56,250
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$56,250
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE$56,250
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY$19,866
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA$18,750
CINCINNATI OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$18,750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $150k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $75k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $56k → 14%NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
IL
MI
NY
MA
OH
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
TN
SC
AL
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region — $333k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 2 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$249k · 75% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: RESEARCH ON TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS COMPLEX

Sub-Saharan Africa$83k · 25% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: RESEARCH ON TUBEROUS SCLEROSIS COMPLEX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.7M · 21 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
7

Total granted

$4.7M
$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+14%

Still filing today

48%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $936k · revenue +69%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
    4× · 2019–2025 · $219k · revenue +37%
  • NU
    NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $150k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • WS
    WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • WM
    Weill Medical College of Cornell Univers
    one grant, 2018 · $21k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI
    one grant, 2018 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
4
William Marsh Rice University

As a leading research university with a distinctive commitment to undergraduate education, Rice University aspires to path breaking research, unsurpassed teaching, and contributions to the betterment of our world. It seeks to fulfill this…

Education
5
Cornell University

Education, research, medical services and other public services.

Education
6
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
7
Case Western Reserve University

Case Western Reserve University is an independent, research-oriented university with broadly based strengths in health, including medicine, nursing and dentistry; in engineering; in the arts and sciences; and in law, management and social…

Education
8
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
9
Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary

THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…

Health
10
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
11
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
12
Trustees of Tufts College

Education and Research

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brown University and the most unlike its peers is American Thoracic Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%48%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%4%20–35yr13%52%35–55yr16%25%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,533

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC — $865,000 · OtherNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INCMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $690,916 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE — $431,250 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTEREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE — $150,000 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS CENTER FOR BRAINHEALTH — $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK — $149,884 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY — $112,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM — $107,182 · Other+10 more — $366,764 · Other+10 moreChildren's Hospital Corporation — $935,922 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corpo…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $218,750 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDIC…+1 more — $37,500 · HealthBaylor College of Medicine — $150,000 · EducationBaylor College of…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $150,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF C…President and Fellows of Harvard College — $150,000 · EducationPresident and Fel…Yale University — $148,768 · EducationYale UniversityEmory University — $93,750 · EducationEmory UniversityUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC — $93,750 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MAS…+2 more — $31,000 · EducationNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION — $150,001 · Human ServicesNorthwestern University — $93,750 · Recreation & SportsBROWN UNIVERSITY — $86,986 · Community Improvement
Other$3,023,496Health$1,192,172Education$817,268Human Services$150,001Recreation & Sports$93,750Community Improvement$86,986

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $935,922 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC — $865,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER — $218,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION — $150,001 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $150,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYale University — $148,768 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $93,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC — $93,750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNorthwestern University — $93,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $86,986 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University Medical Center — $37,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of New England — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation
  • Who funds NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR RARE DISORDERS INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER
  • Who funds NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Baylor College of Medicine
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds Yale University
  • Who funds Emory University
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • Who funds University of New England
  • Who funds AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization National Tuberous Sclerosis Association funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Yale University12% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph