How much did NATIONAL SUMMER LEARNING grant in FY2023?

NATIONAL SUMMER LEARNING reported 6 grants totaling $60,000 in its FY2023 IRS filing.

Where is NATIONAL SUMMER LEARNING based?

NATIONAL SUMMER LEARNING is based in DC.

NATIONAL SUMMER LEARNING

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

NATIONAL SUMMER LEARNING

To connect and equip schools and community organizations to deliver quality summer learning programs to our nation's youth to help close the achievement gap.

$60k

Granted FY2023

Grants

Communities

$10k

Largest

01What you fund

0185% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.

Youth Development$70kEducation$60kArts & Culture$40kRecreation & Sports$38kInternational$8kEnvironment$8kHuman Services$8kOther$40k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2021

parksestablish innovationinnovation fellowship

2022

memphisdanceestablish innovationinnovation fellowship

2023

productive citizensexperienceschildrenestablish innovationinnovation fellowshipfree

2025

equitablefutureenrichmentengagingcreativeeverysteam

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$2.6M

Total assets

Largest grants

TEACHERS IN THE PARK$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA MONICA INC$10,000
ICAN POSITIVE PROGRAMS FOR YOUTH$10,000
FIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$10,000
FRESH AIR FUND$10,000
HORIZONS AT FORT PIERCE$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Teenworks Inc

To help teens to achieve excellence in college, career, and community. teenworks empowers teens to discover a new level of self-confidence, recognize that achieving professional success is within their reach, and build their resources to…

Employment

Chicago Learning Exchange

The Chicago Learning Exchange (CLX) is a nonprofit organization that connects and supports our city's array of out-of-school time youth-focused organizations in order to prepare youth, youth workers, and our city for the future.

Youth Development

American Youthworks

American youthworks provides young people with opportunities to buildcareers, strengthen communities and improve the environment througheducation, on-the-job training, and service to others incorporatingeducation, service to others,…

—

Youth Frontiers Inc

Provide students, educators, and communities with experiences that inspire character, civility and community.

Human Services

Youthbuild Usa Inc

To create a world where all young people are seen for their potentialwith love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild…

Employment

Science Academies of New York

The Schools seek to graduate students who can think critically and creatively.

—

Youthroots

Unleashing the power of youth to change the world.

Education

Yes Every Kid Inc

yes. every kid. is a leading advocacy team with a families-first approach to transform America's education policy landscape.

—

Out Teach

We inspire and prepare today's elementary students to explore the wonders of science and become tomorrow's innovators.

Education

San Francisco Day School

At sf day, we ignite curiosity. we cultivate a diverse, nurturing community that encourages learners to expand their perspectives and become their true selves. students develop as compassionate, creative problem-solvers, prepared to thrive…

Education

Level Up Academy

By tapping the intrinsic motivation and curiosity of every child, we deliver higher than usual growth.

Education

Throughline Learning

Throughline learning partners with communities to imagine and create more equitable, relevant, and effective schools. using research, we convene, coach, and build capacity to improve outcomes and experiences for all students.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Audiences New York Inc and the most unlike its peers is Presbyterian Mo-Ranch Assembly. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/28

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,537

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

27/28

Grantees still filing

22/28

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Youth Development$70,000Education$60,000Arts & Culture$40,000Other$40,000Recreation & Sports$37,500International$7,500Environment$7,500Human Services$7,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY14.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · New York Life Foundation · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NATIONAL SUMMER LEARNING funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

2get no government money at all

1rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: TEACHERS IN THE PARK.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.0× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 471950401 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on TEACHERS IN THE PARK, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 7% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to National Summer Learning?

Find your warmest path to National Summer Learning through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NATIONAL SUMMER LEARNING

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to National Summer Learning?

More from the funding graph

NATIONAL SUMMER LEARNING

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

28 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to National Summer Learning?

More from the funding graph