Skip to content

· Public charity

National Minority Supplier Development Council Inc

The national minority supplier development council advances business opportunities for certified minority business enterprises and connects them to corporate members.

$173k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2023.

Community Improvement$1.5MPublic Safety & Disaster$48kHousing & Shelter$30kHuman Services$25kEmployment$10k
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $95,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $172,629 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $77,629 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$15,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTHWEST MSDC$15,000
NEW YORK - NEW JERSEY MSDC$15,000
MID-STATES MSDC$15,000
CAROLINAS-VIRGINIA MSDC$15,000
OHIO MSDC$15,000
PUERTO RICO MSDC$10,000
GEORGIA MSDC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MSDC: $15k → 14%ACCREDITED LIMOUSINE SERVICE: $8k → 9%SHIRIN & AUNALI KHALFAN GROUP LLC: $8k → 13%INTEGRITY GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC: $8k → 14%NEW YORK & NEW JERSEY MSDC: $20k → 17%SOUTHWEST MSDC: $15k → 10%BUNTY LLC: $8k → 10%CHARLESTON GOURMET BURGER COMPANY: $8k → 11%GE INVESTIGATIONS INC DBA GE PROTECTION: $8k → 13%CONTINENTAL & GLOBAL SERVICES: $8k → 15%INNOVATIVE SOLUTION PARTNERS: $10k → 8%SINGH AUTOMATION LLC: $10k → 12%THE GREEN COMPANY INC: $10k → 21%OZGLO CLEANING COMPANY LLC: $8k → 11%STATPROG INC: $8k → 8%CAROLINAS-VIRGINIA MSDC: $15k → 10%PREMIER BUILDING SERVICES LLC: $8k → 16%GEORGIA MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $35k → 13%MOUNTAIN PLAINS MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $21k → 8%MID-STATES MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $35k → 16%OHIO MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $35k → 15%DYNAMIC LANGUAGE: $10k → 9%CHICAGO MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $35k → 14%EAST WEST CONNECTION INC: $8k → 4%BKW TRANSFORMATION GROUP: $8k → 8%BTII INSTITUTE: $8k → 16%SAMITEON: $8k → 4%EQUITY SOLUTIONS GROUP: $8k → 15%JJC MAINTENANCE LLC: $8k → 15%NEW YORK - NEW JERSEY MSDC: $15k → 17%SOUTHWEST MSDC: $15k → 10%SENSUAL ME ENTERPRISES DBA IRIS GARCIA PRODUCTIONS: $8k → 15%CHIPPEWA INDUSTRIES INC: $10k → 8%MICHIGAN MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $35k → 21%ADVENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES LLC: $8k → 14%CREATIVE ALLIES: $8k → 8%CAROLINAS-VIRGINIA MSDC: $15k → 10%GEORGIA MSDC: $19k → 13%MOUNTAIN PLAINS MSDC: $14k → 8%MID-STATES MSDC: $19k → 16%OHIO MSDC: $15k → 15%CHICAGO MSDC: $19k → 14%RESET DIGITAL: $8k → 17%INTEGRATED SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS LLC: $10k → 8%MICHIGAN MSDC: $19k → 21%GEORGIA MSDC: $10k → 13%MID-STATES MSDC: $15k → 16%J&G PALLETS INC: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
IN
OH
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
TN
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 57% of National Minority Supplier Development Council Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 59% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 4%.

National Minority Supplier Development Council Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$444k · 10 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
38

Total granted

$444k
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+57%

Still filing today

100%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23
Community ImprovementPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GEORGIA BUSINESS COUNCIL INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $64k · revenue +9%
  • MM
    MICHIGAN MINORITY PURCHASING COUNCIL D/B/A MMSDC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $54k · revenue +13%
  • OM
    Ohio Minority Supplier Development Council
    2× · 2021–2023 · $50k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • NM
    NATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL BUSINESS CONSORTIUM FUND INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $905k · revenue +57% · 55% of their budget
  • SC
    SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue -11%
  • JP
    JG PALLETS AND TRUCKING
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Florida State Minority Supplier Dev Council

The Mission of Florida State Minority Supplier Development Council (FSMSDC)is to link corporate and government members with Minority Business Enterprises to foster equity in business.

—
2
Minority Contractor Collaboration
Employment
3
Dallas Fort Worth Minority Supplier Development Council Inc

The mission of the Dallas/Fort Worth Minority Supplier Development Council is to encourage and facilitate procurement and business opportunities between Buying-Entities corporations and public sector agencies and certified Minority…

—
4
National Association of Minority Contractors

To prepare and position deserving minority and female owned businesses to win contracts, increase branding visibility, and to expand their client base through relationship development opportunities.

Education
5
Metro Equity Collabotrative

To provide education and resources to minority operated businesses

Education
6
National Minority Supplier Development Council Inc

The national minority supplier development council advances business opportunities for certified minority business enterprises and connects them to corporate members.

Arts & Culture
7
Capital Region Minority Supplier Development Council

Capital region minority supplier development councils (the council) mission is to provide a direct link between corporate america and minority-owned businesses for the purpose of increasing procurement opportunities.

—
8
North Central Minority Supplier Development Council

Ncmsdc's mission is to provide business development services to corporate members and certified mbes to enhance relationships and maximize business opportunities.

—
9
Eastern Minority Supplier Development Council

Emsdc certifies and connects businesses throughout the eastern region of nmsdc (pennsylvania, new jersey and delaware) with domestic and global business opportunities in conjunction with our member corporations. we are committed to…

—
10
Houston Business Council Inc

The mission of HMSDC is to actively involve its members in efforts that will increase and expand business opportunities and business growth for Minority Business Enterprises and to drive excellence in supplier diversity and supplier…

Civil Rights
11
Western Regional Minority Supplier Development Council

To promote increased procurement and business opportunities for small and emerging businesses, and to develop mutually beneficial business relationships between public and private sectors.

Community Improvement
12
Northwest Minority Supplier Development Council

Identify and develop educational and business opportunities for minority business enterprises (mbes), corporations, and public agencies that result in stakeholder revenue growth.

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mid-States Minority Supplier Development Council Inc; the most unlike its peers is Business Consortium Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL BUSINESS CONSORTIUM FUND INC: $905,000 · OtherNATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL BUSINESS CONSORTIUM FUND INCMID-STATES MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $68,500 · OtherGEORGIA BUSINESS COUNCIL INC: $63,500 · Other+38 more: $345,000 · Other+38 moreCHICAGO MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $53,500 · Community ImprovementCHICAGO MINORITY…MICHIGAN MINORITY PURCHASING COUNCIL D/B/A MMSDC: $53,500 · Community ImprovementMICHIGAN MINORIT…Ohio Minority Supplier Development Council: $50,000 · Community ImprovementOhio Minority Su…ROCKY MOUNTAIN MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $35,000 · Community ImprovementROCKY MOUNTAIN M…CAROLINAS VIRGINIA MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementCAROLINAS VIRGIN…SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $15,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHERN CALIFOR…Southwest Minority Supplier Development Council: $30,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,382,000Community Improvement$237,000Philanthropy$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL BUSINESS CONSORTIUM FUND INC: $905,000 over 1y, 55% of budgetMID-STATES MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $68,500 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetGEORGIA BUSINESS COUNCIL INC: $63,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCHICAGO MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL: $53,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMICHIGAN MINORITY PURCHASING COUNCIL D/B/A MMSDC: $53,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetOhio Minority Supplier Development Council: $50,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetNEW YORK & NEW JERSEY MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $35,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $35,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetCAROLINAS VIRGINIA MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS INC: $30,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetSouthwest Minority Supplier Development Council: $30,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetPR MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $25,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL BUSINESS CONSORTIUM FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MID-STATES MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA BUSINESS COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN MINORITY PURCHASING COUNCIL D/B/A MMSDC ↗
  • Who funds Ohio Minority Supplier Development Council ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK & NEW JERSEY MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CAROLINAS VIRGINIA MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCILS INC ↗
  • Who funds Southwest Minority Supplier Development Council ↗
  • Who funds PR MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA MINORITY SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Local Initiatives Support CorporationNY6.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Local Initiatives Support Corporation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Minority Supplier Development Council Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Minority Supplier Development Council Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $266k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on National Minority Supplier Development Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph